Cargando…
Sample Size Calculations for Population Size Estimation Studies Using Multiplier Methods With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys
BACKGROUND: While guidance exists for obtaining population size estimates using multiplier methods with respondent-driven sampling surveys, we lack specific guidance for making sample size decisions. OBJECTIVE: To guide the design of multiplier method population size estimation studies using respond...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912117 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.7909 |
_version_ | 1783267590439698432 |
---|---|
author | Fearon, Elizabeth Chabata, Sungai T Thompson, Jennifer A Cowan, Frances M Hargreaves, James R |
author_facet | Fearon, Elizabeth Chabata, Sungai T Thompson, Jennifer A Cowan, Frances M Hargreaves, James R |
author_sort | Fearon, Elizabeth |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: While guidance exists for obtaining population size estimates using multiplier methods with respondent-driven sampling surveys, we lack specific guidance for making sample size decisions. OBJECTIVE: To guide the design of multiplier method population size estimation studies using respondent-driven sampling surveys to reduce the random error around the estimate obtained. METHODS: The population size estimate is obtained by dividing the number of individuals receiving a service or the number of unique objects distributed (M) by the proportion of individuals in a representative survey who report receipt of the service or object (P). We have developed an approach to sample size calculation, interpreting methods to estimate the variance around estimates obtained using multiplier methods in conjunction with research into design effects and respondent-driven sampling. We describe an application to estimate the number of female sex workers in Harare, Zimbabwe. RESULTS: There is high variance in estimates. Random error around the size estimate reflects uncertainty from M and P, particularly when the estimate of P in the respondent-driven sampling survey is low. As expected, sample size requirements are higher when the design effect of the survey is assumed to be greater. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a method for investigating the effects of sample size on the precision of a population size estimate obtained using multipler methods and respondent-driven sampling. Uncertainty in the size estimate is high, particularly when P is small, so balancing against other potential sources of bias, we advise researchers to consider longer service attendance reference periods and to distribute more unique objects, which is likely to result in a higher estimate of P in the respondent-driven sampling survey. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5620454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56204542017-10-05 Sample Size Calculations for Population Size Estimation Studies Using Multiplier Methods With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys Fearon, Elizabeth Chabata, Sungai T Thompson, Jennifer A Cowan, Frances M Hargreaves, James R JMIR Public Health Surveill Short Paper BACKGROUND: While guidance exists for obtaining population size estimates using multiplier methods with respondent-driven sampling surveys, we lack specific guidance for making sample size decisions. OBJECTIVE: To guide the design of multiplier method population size estimation studies using respondent-driven sampling surveys to reduce the random error around the estimate obtained. METHODS: The population size estimate is obtained by dividing the number of individuals receiving a service or the number of unique objects distributed (M) by the proportion of individuals in a representative survey who report receipt of the service or object (P). We have developed an approach to sample size calculation, interpreting methods to estimate the variance around estimates obtained using multiplier methods in conjunction with research into design effects and respondent-driven sampling. We describe an application to estimate the number of female sex workers in Harare, Zimbabwe. RESULTS: There is high variance in estimates. Random error around the size estimate reflects uncertainty from M and P, particularly when the estimate of P in the respondent-driven sampling survey is low. As expected, sample size requirements are higher when the design effect of the survey is assumed to be greater. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a method for investigating the effects of sample size on the precision of a population size estimate obtained using multipler methods and respondent-driven sampling. Uncertainty in the size estimate is high, particularly when P is small, so balancing against other potential sources of bias, we advise researchers to consider longer service attendance reference periods and to distribute more unique objects, which is likely to result in a higher estimate of P in the respondent-driven sampling survey. JMIR Publications 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5620454/ /pubmed/28912117 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.7909 Text en ©Elizabeth Fearon, Sungai T Chabata, Jennifer A Thompson, Frances M Cowan, James R Hargreaves. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (http://publichealth.jmir.org), 14.09.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Short Paper Fearon, Elizabeth Chabata, Sungai T Thompson, Jennifer A Cowan, Frances M Hargreaves, James R Sample Size Calculations for Population Size Estimation Studies Using Multiplier Methods With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys |
title | Sample Size Calculations for Population Size Estimation Studies Using Multiplier Methods With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys |
title_full | Sample Size Calculations for Population Size Estimation Studies Using Multiplier Methods With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys |
title_fullStr | Sample Size Calculations for Population Size Estimation Studies Using Multiplier Methods With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys |
title_full_unstemmed | Sample Size Calculations for Population Size Estimation Studies Using Multiplier Methods With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys |
title_short | Sample Size Calculations for Population Size Estimation Studies Using Multiplier Methods With Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys |
title_sort | sample size calculations for population size estimation studies using multiplier methods with respondent-driven sampling surveys |
topic | Short Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28912117 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.7909 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fearonelizabeth samplesizecalculationsforpopulationsizeestimationstudiesusingmultipliermethodswithrespondentdrivensamplingsurveys AT chabatasungait samplesizecalculationsforpopulationsizeestimationstudiesusingmultipliermethodswithrespondentdrivensamplingsurveys AT thompsonjennifera samplesizecalculationsforpopulationsizeestimationstudiesusingmultipliermethodswithrespondentdrivensamplingsurveys AT cowanfrancesm samplesizecalculationsforpopulationsizeestimationstudiesusingmultipliermethodswithrespondentdrivensamplingsurveys AT hargreavesjamesr samplesizecalculationsforpopulationsizeestimationstudiesusingmultipliermethodswithrespondentdrivensamplingsurveys |