Cargando…
Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing
Surface damage on honeycomb aircraft panels is often measured manually, and is therefore subject to variation based on inspection personnel. Eddy current testing (ECT) is sensitive to variations in probe-to-specimen spacing, or lift-off, and is thus promising for high-resolution profiling of surface...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28906434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092114 |
_version_ | 1783267635883933696 |
---|---|
author | Reyno, Tyler Underhill, P. Ross Krause, Thomas W. Marsden, Catharine Wowk, Diane |
author_facet | Reyno, Tyler Underhill, P. Ross Krause, Thomas W. Marsden, Catharine Wowk, Diane |
author_sort | Reyno, Tyler |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surface damage on honeycomb aircraft panels is often measured manually, and is therefore subject to variation based on inspection personnel. Eddy current testing (ECT) is sensitive to variations in probe-to-specimen spacing, or lift-off, and is thus promising for high-resolution profiling of surface damage on aluminum panels. Lower frequency testing also allows inspection through the face sheet, an advantage over optical 3D scanning methods. This paper presents results from the ECT inspection of surface damage on an approximately flat aluminum honeycomb aircraft panel, and compares the measurements to those taken using optical 3D scanning technology. An ECT C-Scan of the dented panel surface was obtained by attaching the probe to a robotic scanning apparatus. Data was taken simultaneously at four frequencies of 25, 100, 400 and 1600 kHz. A reference surface was then defined that approximated the original, undamaged panel surface, which also compensated for the effects of specimen tilt and thermal drift within the ECT instrument. Data was converted to lift-off using height calibration curves developed for each probe frequency. A damage region of 22,550 mm(2) area with dents ranging in depth from 0.13–1.01 mm was analyzed. The method was accurate at 1600 kHz to within 0.05 mm (2σ) when compared with 231 measurements taken via optical 3D scanning. Testing at 25 kHz revealed a 3.2 mm cell size within the honeycomb core, which was confirmed via destructive evaluation. As a result, ECT demonstrates potential for implementation as a method for rapid in-field aircraft panel surface damage assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5620663 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56206632017-10-03 Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing Reyno, Tyler Underhill, P. Ross Krause, Thomas W. Marsden, Catharine Wowk, Diane Sensors (Basel) Article Surface damage on honeycomb aircraft panels is often measured manually, and is therefore subject to variation based on inspection personnel. Eddy current testing (ECT) is sensitive to variations in probe-to-specimen spacing, or lift-off, and is thus promising for high-resolution profiling of surface damage on aluminum panels. Lower frequency testing also allows inspection through the face sheet, an advantage over optical 3D scanning methods. This paper presents results from the ECT inspection of surface damage on an approximately flat aluminum honeycomb aircraft panel, and compares the measurements to those taken using optical 3D scanning technology. An ECT C-Scan of the dented panel surface was obtained by attaching the probe to a robotic scanning apparatus. Data was taken simultaneously at four frequencies of 25, 100, 400 and 1600 kHz. A reference surface was then defined that approximated the original, undamaged panel surface, which also compensated for the effects of specimen tilt and thermal drift within the ECT instrument. Data was converted to lift-off using height calibration curves developed for each probe frequency. A damage region of 22,550 mm(2) area with dents ranging in depth from 0.13–1.01 mm was analyzed. The method was accurate at 1600 kHz to within 0.05 mm (2σ) when compared with 231 measurements taken via optical 3D scanning. Testing at 25 kHz revealed a 3.2 mm cell size within the honeycomb core, which was confirmed via destructive evaluation. As a result, ECT demonstrates potential for implementation as a method for rapid in-field aircraft panel surface damage assessment. MDPI 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5620663/ /pubmed/28906434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092114 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Reyno, Tyler Underhill, P. Ross Krause, Thomas W. Marsden, Catharine Wowk, Diane Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing |
title | Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing |
title_full | Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing |
title_fullStr | Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing |
title_short | Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing |
title_sort | surface profiling and core evaluation of aluminum honeycomb sandwich aircraft panels using multi-frequency eddy current testing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620663/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28906434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reynotyler surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting AT underhillpross surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting AT krausethomasw surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting AT marsdencatharine surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting AT wowkdiane surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting |