Cargando…

Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing

Surface damage on honeycomb aircraft panels is often measured manually, and is therefore subject to variation based on inspection personnel. Eddy current testing (ECT) is sensitive to variations in probe-to-specimen spacing, or lift-off, and is thus promising for high-resolution profiling of surface...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reyno, Tyler, Underhill, P. Ross, Krause, Thomas W., Marsden, Catharine, Wowk, Diane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28906434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092114
_version_ 1783267635883933696
author Reyno, Tyler
Underhill, P. Ross
Krause, Thomas W.
Marsden, Catharine
Wowk, Diane
author_facet Reyno, Tyler
Underhill, P. Ross
Krause, Thomas W.
Marsden, Catharine
Wowk, Diane
author_sort Reyno, Tyler
collection PubMed
description Surface damage on honeycomb aircraft panels is often measured manually, and is therefore subject to variation based on inspection personnel. Eddy current testing (ECT) is sensitive to variations in probe-to-specimen spacing, or lift-off, and is thus promising for high-resolution profiling of surface damage on aluminum panels. Lower frequency testing also allows inspection through the face sheet, an advantage over optical 3D scanning methods. This paper presents results from the ECT inspection of surface damage on an approximately flat aluminum honeycomb aircraft panel, and compares the measurements to those taken using optical 3D scanning technology. An ECT C-Scan of the dented panel surface was obtained by attaching the probe to a robotic scanning apparatus. Data was taken simultaneously at four frequencies of 25, 100, 400 and 1600 kHz. A reference surface was then defined that approximated the original, undamaged panel surface, which also compensated for the effects of specimen tilt and thermal drift within the ECT instrument. Data was converted to lift-off using height calibration curves developed for each probe frequency. A damage region of 22,550 mm(2) area with dents ranging in depth from 0.13–1.01 mm was analyzed. The method was accurate at 1600 kHz to within 0.05 mm (2σ) when compared with 231 measurements taken via optical 3D scanning. Testing at 25 kHz revealed a 3.2 mm cell size within the honeycomb core, which was confirmed via destructive evaluation. As a result, ECT demonstrates potential for implementation as a method for rapid in-field aircraft panel surface damage assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5620663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56206632017-10-03 Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing Reyno, Tyler Underhill, P. Ross Krause, Thomas W. Marsden, Catharine Wowk, Diane Sensors (Basel) Article Surface damage on honeycomb aircraft panels is often measured manually, and is therefore subject to variation based on inspection personnel. Eddy current testing (ECT) is sensitive to variations in probe-to-specimen spacing, or lift-off, and is thus promising for high-resolution profiling of surface damage on aluminum panels. Lower frequency testing also allows inspection through the face sheet, an advantage over optical 3D scanning methods. This paper presents results from the ECT inspection of surface damage on an approximately flat aluminum honeycomb aircraft panel, and compares the measurements to those taken using optical 3D scanning technology. An ECT C-Scan of the dented panel surface was obtained by attaching the probe to a robotic scanning apparatus. Data was taken simultaneously at four frequencies of 25, 100, 400 and 1600 kHz. A reference surface was then defined that approximated the original, undamaged panel surface, which also compensated for the effects of specimen tilt and thermal drift within the ECT instrument. Data was converted to lift-off using height calibration curves developed for each probe frequency. A damage region of 22,550 mm(2) area with dents ranging in depth from 0.13–1.01 mm was analyzed. The method was accurate at 1600 kHz to within 0.05 mm (2σ) when compared with 231 measurements taken via optical 3D scanning. Testing at 25 kHz revealed a 3.2 mm cell size within the honeycomb core, which was confirmed via destructive evaluation. As a result, ECT demonstrates potential for implementation as a method for rapid in-field aircraft panel surface damage assessment. MDPI 2017-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5620663/ /pubmed/28906434 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092114 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Reyno, Tyler
Underhill, P. Ross
Krause, Thomas W.
Marsden, Catharine
Wowk, Diane
Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing
title Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing
title_full Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing
title_fullStr Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing
title_full_unstemmed Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing
title_short Surface Profiling and Core Evaluation of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Aircraft Panels Using Multi-Frequency Eddy Current Testing
title_sort surface profiling and core evaluation of aluminum honeycomb sandwich aircraft panels using multi-frequency eddy current testing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28906434
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17092114
work_keys_str_mv AT reynotyler surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting
AT underhillpross surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting
AT krausethomasw surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting
AT marsdencatharine surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting
AT wowkdiane surfaceprofilingandcoreevaluationofaluminumhoneycombsandwichaircraftpanelsusingmultifrequencyeddycurrenttesting