Cargando…

Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group

Increased homogeneity of agricultural landscapes in the last century has led to a loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, management practices such as wildflower borders offer supplementary resources to many beneficial arthropods. There is evidence that these borders can increase benef...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCabe, Ellie, Loeb, Gregory, Grab, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects8030073
_version_ 1783267639517249536
author McCabe, Ellie
Loeb, Gregory
Grab, Heather
author_facet McCabe, Ellie
Loeb, Gregory
Grab, Heather
author_sort McCabe, Ellie
collection PubMed
description Increased homogeneity of agricultural landscapes in the last century has led to a loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, management practices such as wildflower borders offer supplementary resources to many beneficial arthropods. There is evidence that these borders can increase beneficial arthropod abundance, including natural enemies of many pests. However, this increase in local habitat diversity can also have effects on pest populations, and these effects are not well-studied. In this study, we investigated how wildflower borders affect both natural enemies and pests within an adjacent strawberry crop. Significantly more predators were captured in strawberry plantings with wildflower borders versus plantings without wildflowers, but this effect depended on sampling method. Overall, herbivore populations were lower in plots with a wildflower border; however, responses to wildflower borders varied across specific pest groups. Densities of Lygus lineolaris (Tarnished Plant Bug), a generalist pest, increased significantly in plots that had a border, while Stelidota geminata (Strawberry Sap Beetle) decreased in strawberry fields with a wildflower border. These results suggest that wildflower borders may support the control of some pest insects; however, if the pest is a generalist and can utilize the resources of the wildflower patch, their populations may increase within the crop.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5620693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56206932017-10-03 Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group McCabe, Ellie Loeb, Gregory Grab, Heather Insects Article Increased homogeneity of agricultural landscapes in the last century has led to a loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, management practices such as wildflower borders offer supplementary resources to many beneficial arthropods. There is evidence that these borders can increase beneficial arthropod abundance, including natural enemies of many pests. However, this increase in local habitat diversity can also have effects on pest populations, and these effects are not well-studied. In this study, we investigated how wildflower borders affect both natural enemies and pests within an adjacent strawberry crop. Significantly more predators were captured in strawberry plantings with wildflower borders versus plantings without wildflowers, but this effect depended on sampling method. Overall, herbivore populations were lower in plots with a wildflower border; however, responses to wildflower borders varied across specific pest groups. Densities of Lygus lineolaris (Tarnished Plant Bug), a generalist pest, increased significantly in plots that had a border, while Stelidota geminata (Strawberry Sap Beetle) decreased in strawberry fields with a wildflower border. These results suggest that wildflower borders may support the control of some pest insects; however, if the pest is a generalist and can utilize the resources of the wildflower patch, their populations may increase within the crop. MDPI 2017-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5620693/ /pubmed/28757543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects8030073 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
McCabe, Ellie
Loeb, Gregory
Grab, Heather
Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group
title Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group
title_full Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group
title_fullStr Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group
title_full_unstemmed Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group
title_short Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group
title_sort responses of crop pests and natural enemies to wildflower borders depends on functional group
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5620693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects8030073
work_keys_str_mv AT mccabeellie responsesofcroppestsandnaturalenemiestowildflowerbordersdependsonfunctionalgroup
AT loebgregory responsesofcroppestsandnaturalenemiestowildflowerbordersdependsonfunctionalgroup
AT grabheather responsesofcroppestsandnaturalenemiestowildflowerbordersdependsonfunctionalgroup