Cargando…
Validation of a High Sampling Rate Inertial Measurement Unit for Acceleration During Running
The musculo-skeletal response of athletes to various activities during training exercises has become a critical issue in order to optimize their performance and minimize injuries. However, dynamic and kinematic measures of an athlete’s activity are generally limited by constraints in data collection...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17091958 |
_version_ | 1783267767440375808 |
---|---|
author | Provot, Thomas Chiementin, Xavier Oudin, Emeric Bolaers, Fabrice Murer, Sébastien |
author_facet | Provot, Thomas Chiementin, Xavier Oudin, Emeric Bolaers, Fabrice Murer, Sébastien |
author_sort | Provot, Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | The musculo-skeletal response of athletes to various activities during training exercises has become a critical issue in order to optimize their performance and minimize injuries. However, dynamic and kinematic measures of an athlete’s activity are generally limited by constraints in data collection and technology. Thus, the choice of reliable and accurate sensors is crucial for gathering data in indoor and outdoor conditions. The aim of this study is to validate the use of the accelerometer of a high sampling rate ([Formula: see text]) Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) in the frame of running activities. To this end, two validation protocols are imposed: a classical one on a shaker, followed by another one during running, the IMU being attached to a test subject. For each protocol, the response of the IMU Accelerometer (IMUA) is compared to a calibrated industrial accelerometer, considered as the gold standard for dynamic and kinematic data collection. The repeatability, impact of signal frequency and amplitude (on shaker) as well as the influence of speed (while running) are investigated. Results reveal that the IMUA exhibits good repeatability. Coefficient of Variation CV is [Formula: see text] on the shaker and [Formula: see text] while running. However, the shaker test shows that the IMUA is affected by the signal frequency (error exceeds [Formula: see text] beyond [Formula: see text]), an observation confirmed by the running test. Nevertheless, the IMUA provides a reliable measure in the range 0–100 Hz, i.e., the most relevant part in the energy spectrum over the range 0–150 Hz during running. In our view, these findings emphasize the validity of IMUs for the measurement of acceleration during running. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5621469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56214692017-10-03 Validation of a High Sampling Rate Inertial Measurement Unit for Acceleration During Running Provot, Thomas Chiementin, Xavier Oudin, Emeric Bolaers, Fabrice Murer, Sébastien Sensors (Basel) Article The musculo-skeletal response of athletes to various activities during training exercises has become a critical issue in order to optimize their performance and minimize injuries. However, dynamic and kinematic measures of an athlete’s activity are generally limited by constraints in data collection and technology. Thus, the choice of reliable and accurate sensors is crucial for gathering data in indoor and outdoor conditions. The aim of this study is to validate the use of the accelerometer of a high sampling rate ([Formula: see text]) Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) in the frame of running activities. To this end, two validation protocols are imposed: a classical one on a shaker, followed by another one during running, the IMU being attached to a test subject. For each protocol, the response of the IMU Accelerometer (IMUA) is compared to a calibrated industrial accelerometer, considered as the gold standard for dynamic and kinematic data collection. The repeatability, impact of signal frequency and amplitude (on shaker) as well as the influence of speed (while running) are investigated. Results reveal that the IMUA exhibits good repeatability. Coefficient of Variation CV is [Formula: see text] on the shaker and [Formula: see text] while running. However, the shaker test shows that the IMUA is affected by the signal frequency (error exceeds [Formula: see text] beyond [Formula: see text]), an observation confirmed by the running test. Nevertheless, the IMUA provides a reliable measure in the range 0–100 Hz, i.e., the most relevant part in the energy spectrum over the range 0–150 Hz during running. In our view, these findings emphasize the validity of IMUs for the measurement of acceleration during running. MDPI 2017-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5621469/ /pubmed/28841142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17091958 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Provot, Thomas Chiementin, Xavier Oudin, Emeric Bolaers, Fabrice Murer, Sébastien Validation of a High Sampling Rate Inertial Measurement Unit for Acceleration During Running |
title | Validation of a High Sampling Rate Inertial Measurement Unit for Acceleration During Running |
title_full | Validation of a High Sampling Rate Inertial Measurement Unit for Acceleration During Running |
title_fullStr | Validation of a High Sampling Rate Inertial Measurement Unit for Acceleration During Running |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a High Sampling Rate Inertial Measurement Unit for Acceleration During Running |
title_short | Validation of a High Sampling Rate Inertial Measurement Unit for Acceleration During Running |
title_sort | validation of a high sampling rate inertial measurement unit for acceleration during running |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28841142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17091958 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT provotthomas validationofahighsamplingrateinertialmeasurementunitforaccelerationduringrunning AT chiementinxavier validationofahighsamplingrateinertialmeasurementunitforaccelerationduringrunning AT oudinemeric validationofahighsamplingrateinertialmeasurementunitforaccelerationduringrunning AT bolaersfabrice validationofahighsamplingrateinertialmeasurementunitforaccelerationduringrunning AT murersebastien validationofahighsamplingrateinertialmeasurementunitforaccelerationduringrunning |