Cargando…
Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation
BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (iMR) predisposes to right ventricular (RV) pressure and volume overload, providing a nidus for RV dysfunction (RV(DYS)) and non-ischemic fibrosis (NIF). Echocardiography (echo) is widely used to assess iMR, but performance of different indices as markers of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28961271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185657 |
_version_ | 1783267797554429952 |
---|---|
author | Di Franco, Antonino Kim, Jiwon Rodriguez-Diego, Sara Khalique, Omar Siden, Jonathan Y. Goldburg, Samantha R. Mehta, Neil K. Srinivasan, Aparna Ratcliffe, Mark B. Levine, Robert A. Crea, Filippo Devereux, Richard B. Weinsaft, Jonathan W. |
author_facet | Di Franco, Antonino Kim, Jiwon Rodriguez-Diego, Sara Khalique, Omar Siden, Jonathan Y. Goldburg, Samantha R. Mehta, Neil K. Srinivasan, Aparna Ratcliffe, Mark B. Levine, Robert A. Crea, Filippo Devereux, Richard B. Weinsaft, Jonathan W. |
author_sort | Di Franco, Antonino |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (iMR) predisposes to right ventricular (RV) pressure and volume overload, providing a nidus for RV dysfunction (RV(DYS)) and non-ischemic fibrosis (NIF). Echocardiography (echo) is widely used to assess iMR, but performance of different indices as markers of RV(DYS) and NIF is unknown. METHODS: iMR patients prospectively underwent echo and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 72 hours. Echo quantified iMR, assessed conventional RV indices (TAPSE, RV-S’, fractional area change [FAC]), and strain via speckle tracking in apical 4-chamber (global longitudinal strain [RV-GLS]) and parasternal long axis orientation (transverse strain). CMR volumetrically quantified RVEF, and assessed ischemic pattern myocardial infarction (MI) and septal NIF. RESULTS: 73 iMR patients were studied; 36% had RV(DYS) (EF<50%) on CMR among whom LVEF was lower, PA systolic pressure higher, and MI size larger (all p<0.05). CMR RVEF was paralleled by echo results; correlations were highest for RV-GLS (r = 0.73) and lowest for RV-S’ (r = 0.43; all p<0.001). RV(DYS) patients more often had CMR-evidenced NIF (54% vs. 7%; p<0.001). Whereas all RV indices were lower among NIF-affected patients (all p≤0.006), percent change was largest for transverse strain (48.3%). CMR RVEF was independently associated with RV-GLS (partial r = 0.57, p<0.001) and transverse strain (r = 0.38, p = 0.002) (R = 0.78, p<0.001). Overall diagnostic performance of RV-GLS and transverse strain were similar (AUC = 0.93[0.87–0.99]|0.91[0.84–0.99], both p<0.001), and yielded near equivalent sensitivity and specificity (85%|83% and 80%|79% respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional echo indices, RV strain parameters yield stronger correlation with CMR-defined RVEF and potentially constitute better markers of CMR-evidenced NIF in iMR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5621708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56217082017-10-17 Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation Di Franco, Antonino Kim, Jiwon Rodriguez-Diego, Sara Khalique, Omar Siden, Jonathan Y. Goldburg, Samantha R. Mehta, Neil K. Srinivasan, Aparna Ratcliffe, Mark B. Levine, Robert A. Crea, Filippo Devereux, Richard B. Weinsaft, Jonathan W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (iMR) predisposes to right ventricular (RV) pressure and volume overload, providing a nidus for RV dysfunction (RV(DYS)) and non-ischemic fibrosis (NIF). Echocardiography (echo) is widely used to assess iMR, but performance of different indices as markers of RV(DYS) and NIF is unknown. METHODS: iMR patients prospectively underwent echo and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 72 hours. Echo quantified iMR, assessed conventional RV indices (TAPSE, RV-S’, fractional area change [FAC]), and strain via speckle tracking in apical 4-chamber (global longitudinal strain [RV-GLS]) and parasternal long axis orientation (transverse strain). CMR volumetrically quantified RVEF, and assessed ischemic pattern myocardial infarction (MI) and septal NIF. RESULTS: 73 iMR patients were studied; 36% had RV(DYS) (EF<50%) on CMR among whom LVEF was lower, PA systolic pressure higher, and MI size larger (all p<0.05). CMR RVEF was paralleled by echo results; correlations were highest for RV-GLS (r = 0.73) and lowest for RV-S’ (r = 0.43; all p<0.001). RV(DYS) patients more often had CMR-evidenced NIF (54% vs. 7%; p<0.001). Whereas all RV indices were lower among NIF-affected patients (all p≤0.006), percent change was largest for transverse strain (48.3%). CMR RVEF was independently associated with RV-GLS (partial r = 0.57, p<0.001) and transverse strain (r = 0.38, p = 0.002) (R = 0.78, p<0.001). Overall diagnostic performance of RV-GLS and transverse strain were similar (AUC = 0.93[0.87–0.99]|0.91[0.84–0.99], both p<0.001), and yielded near equivalent sensitivity and specificity (85%|83% and 80%|79% respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional echo indices, RV strain parameters yield stronger correlation with CMR-defined RVEF and potentially constitute better markers of CMR-evidenced NIF in iMR. Public Library of Science 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5621708/ /pubmed/28961271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185657 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Di Franco, Antonino Kim, Jiwon Rodriguez-Diego, Sara Khalique, Omar Siden, Jonathan Y. Goldburg, Samantha R. Mehta, Neil K. Srinivasan, Aparna Ratcliffe, Mark B. Levine, Robert A. Crea, Filippo Devereux, Richard B. Weinsaft, Jonathan W. Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation |
title | Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation |
title_full | Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation |
title_fullStr | Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation |
title_full_unstemmed | Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation |
title_short | Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation |
title_sort | multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28961271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185657 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT difrancoantonino multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT kimjiwon multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT rodriguezdiegosara multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT khaliqueomar multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT sidenjonathany multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT goldburgsamanthar multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT mehtaneilk multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT srinivasanaparna multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT ratcliffemarkb multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT levineroberta multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT creafilippo multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT devereuxrichardb multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation AT weinsaftjonathanw multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation |