Cargando…

Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation

BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (iMR) predisposes to right ventricular (RV) pressure and volume overload, providing a nidus for RV dysfunction (RV(DYS)) and non-ischemic fibrosis (NIF). Echocardiography (echo) is widely used to assess iMR, but performance of different indices as markers of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Franco, Antonino, Kim, Jiwon, Rodriguez-Diego, Sara, Khalique, Omar, Siden, Jonathan Y., Goldburg, Samantha R., Mehta, Neil K., Srinivasan, Aparna, Ratcliffe, Mark B., Levine, Robert A., Crea, Filippo, Devereux, Richard B., Weinsaft, Jonathan W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28961271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185657
_version_ 1783267797554429952
author Di Franco, Antonino
Kim, Jiwon
Rodriguez-Diego, Sara
Khalique, Omar
Siden, Jonathan Y.
Goldburg, Samantha R.
Mehta, Neil K.
Srinivasan, Aparna
Ratcliffe, Mark B.
Levine, Robert A.
Crea, Filippo
Devereux, Richard B.
Weinsaft, Jonathan W.
author_facet Di Franco, Antonino
Kim, Jiwon
Rodriguez-Diego, Sara
Khalique, Omar
Siden, Jonathan Y.
Goldburg, Samantha R.
Mehta, Neil K.
Srinivasan, Aparna
Ratcliffe, Mark B.
Levine, Robert A.
Crea, Filippo
Devereux, Richard B.
Weinsaft, Jonathan W.
author_sort Di Franco, Antonino
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (iMR) predisposes to right ventricular (RV) pressure and volume overload, providing a nidus for RV dysfunction (RV(DYS)) and non-ischemic fibrosis (NIF). Echocardiography (echo) is widely used to assess iMR, but performance of different indices as markers of RV(DYS) and NIF is unknown. METHODS: iMR patients prospectively underwent echo and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 72 hours. Echo quantified iMR, assessed conventional RV indices (TAPSE, RV-S’, fractional area change [FAC]), and strain via speckle tracking in apical 4-chamber (global longitudinal strain [RV-GLS]) and parasternal long axis orientation (transverse strain). CMR volumetrically quantified RVEF, and assessed ischemic pattern myocardial infarction (MI) and septal NIF. RESULTS: 73 iMR patients were studied; 36% had RV(DYS) (EF<50%) on CMR among whom LVEF was lower, PA systolic pressure higher, and MI size larger (all p<0.05). CMR RVEF was paralleled by echo results; correlations were highest for RV-GLS (r = 0.73) and lowest for RV-S’ (r = 0.43; all p<0.001). RV(DYS) patients more often had CMR-evidenced NIF (54% vs. 7%; p<0.001). Whereas all RV indices were lower among NIF-affected patients (all p≤0.006), percent change was largest for transverse strain (48.3%). CMR RVEF was independently associated with RV-GLS (partial r = 0.57, p<0.001) and transverse strain (r = 0.38, p = 0.002) (R = 0.78, p<0.001). Overall diagnostic performance of RV-GLS and transverse strain were similar (AUC = 0.93[0.87–0.99]|0.91[0.84–0.99], both p<0.001), and yielded near equivalent sensitivity and specificity (85%|83% and 80%|79% respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional echo indices, RV strain parameters yield stronger correlation with CMR-defined RVEF and potentially constitute better markers of CMR-evidenced NIF in iMR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5621708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56217082017-10-17 Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation Di Franco, Antonino Kim, Jiwon Rodriguez-Diego, Sara Khalique, Omar Siden, Jonathan Y. Goldburg, Samantha R. Mehta, Neil K. Srinivasan, Aparna Ratcliffe, Mark B. Levine, Robert A. Crea, Filippo Devereux, Richard B. Weinsaft, Jonathan W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (iMR) predisposes to right ventricular (RV) pressure and volume overload, providing a nidus for RV dysfunction (RV(DYS)) and non-ischemic fibrosis (NIF). Echocardiography (echo) is widely used to assess iMR, but performance of different indices as markers of RV(DYS) and NIF is unknown. METHODS: iMR patients prospectively underwent echo and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 72 hours. Echo quantified iMR, assessed conventional RV indices (TAPSE, RV-S’, fractional area change [FAC]), and strain via speckle tracking in apical 4-chamber (global longitudinal strain [RV-GLS]) and parasternal long axis orientation (transverse strain). CMR volumetrically quantified RVEF, and assessed ischemic pattern myocardial infarction (MI) and septal NIF. RESULTS: 73 iMR patients were studied; 36% had RV(DYS) (EF<50%) on CMR among whom LVEF was lower, PA systolic pressure higher, and MI size larger (all p<0.05). CMR RVEF was paralleled by echo results; correlations were highest for RV-GLS (r = 0.73) and lowest for RV-S’ (r = 0.43; all p<0.001). RV(DYS) patients more often had CMR-evidenced NIF (54% vs. 7%; p<0.001). Whereas all RV indices were lower among NIF-affected patients (all p≤0.006), percent change was largest for transverse strain (48.3%). CMR RVEF was independently associated with RV-GLS (partial r = 0.57, p<0.001) and transverse strain (r = 0.38, p = 0.002) (R = 0.78, p<0.001). Overall diagnostic performance of RV-GLS and transverse strain were similar (AUC = 0.93[0.87–0.99]|0.91[0.84–0.99], both p<0.001), and yielded near equivalent sensitivity and specificity (85%|83% and 80%|79% respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared to conventional echo indices, RV strain parameters yield stronger correlation with CMR-defined RVEF and potentially constitute better markers of CMR-evidenced NIF in iMR. Public Library of Science 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5621708/ /pubmed/28961271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185657 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Di Franco, Antonino
Kim, Jiwon
Rodriguez-Diego, Sara
Khalique, Omar
Siden, Jonathan Y.
Goldburg, Samantha R.
Mehta, Neil K.
Srinivasan, Aparna
Ratcliffe, Mark B.
Levine, Robert A.
Crea, Filippo
Devereux, Richard B.
Weinsaft, Jonathan W.
Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation
title Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation
title_full Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation
title_fullStr Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation
title_full_unstemmed Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation
title_short Multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation
title_sort multiplanar strain quantification for assessment of right ventricular dysfunction and non-ischemic fibrosis among patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5621708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28961271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185657
work_keys_str_mv AT difrancoantonino multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT kimjiwon multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT rodriguezdiegosara multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT khaliqueomar multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT sidenjonathany multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT goldburgsamanthar multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT mehtaneilk multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT srinivasanaparna multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT ratcliffemarkb multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT levineroberta multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT creafilippo multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT devereuxrichardb multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation
AT weinsaftjonathanw multiplanarstrainquantificationforassessmentofrightventriculardysfunctionandnonischemicfibrosisamongpatientswithischemicmitralregurgitation