Cargando…
Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials
In recent years, new radiotherapy techniques have emerged that aim to improve treatment outcome and reduce toxicity. The standard method of evaluating such techniques is to conduct large scale multicenter clinical trials, often across continents. A major challenge for such trials is quality assuranc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28993798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00221 |
_version_ | 1783267852808093696 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Amy Tien Yee Tan, Li Tee Duke, Simon Ng, Wai-Tong |
author_facet | Chang, Amy Tien Yee Tan, Li Tee Duke, Simon Ng, Wai-Tong |
author_sort | Chang, Amy Tien Yee |
collection | PubMed |
description | In recent years, new radiotherapy techniques have emerged that aim to improve treatment outcome and reduce toxicity. The standard method of evaluating such techniques is to conduct large scale multicenter clinical trials, often across continents. A major challenge for such trials is quality assurance to ensure consistency of treatment across all participating centers. Analyses from previous studies have shown that poor compliance and protocol violation have a significant adverse effect on treatment outcomes. The results of the clinical trials may, therefore, be confounded by poor quality radiotherapy. Target volume delineation (TVD) is one of the most critical steps in the radiotherapy process. Many studies have shown large inter-observer variations in contouring, both within and outside of clinical trials. High precision techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided brachytherapy, and stereotactic radiotherapy have steep dose gradients, and errors in contouring may lead to inadequate dose to the tumor and consequently, reduce the chance of cure. Similarly, variation in organ at risk delineation will make it difficult to evaluate dose response for toxicity. This article reviews the literature on TVD variability and its impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes. The implications for quality assurance in clinical trials are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5622143 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56221432017-10-09 Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials Chang, Amy Tien Yee Tan, Li Tee Duke, Simon Ng, Wai-Tong Front Oncol Oncology In recent years, new radiotherapy techniques have emerged that aim to improve treatment outcome and reduce toxicity. The standard method of evaluating such techniques is to conduct large scale multicenter clinical trials, often across continents. A major challenge for such trials is quality assurance to ensure consistency of treatment across all participating centers. Analyses from previous studies have shown that poor compliance and protocol violation have a significant adverse effect on treatment outcomes. The results of the clinical trials may, therefore, be confounded by poor quality radiotherapy. Target volume delineation (TVD) is one of the most critical steps in the radiotherapy process. Many studies have shown large inter-observer variations in contouring, both within and outside of clinical trials. High precision techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided brachytherapy, and stereotactic radiotherapy have steep dose gradients, and errors in contouring may lead to inadequate dose to the tumor and consequently, reduce the chance of cure. Similarly, variation in organ at risk delineation will make it difficult to evaluate dose response for toxicity. This article reviews the literature on TVD variability and its impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes. The implications for quality assurance in clinical trials are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5622143/ /pubmed/28993798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00221 Text en Copyright © 2017 Chang, Tan, Duke and Ng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Chang, Amy Tien Yee Tan, Li Tee Duke, Simon Ng, Wai-Tong Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials |
title | Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials |
title_full | Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials |
title_fullStr | Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials |
title_short | Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials |
title_sort | challenges for quality assurance of target volume delineation in clinical trials |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622143/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28993798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changamytienyee challengesforqualityassuranceoftargetvolumedelineationinclinicaltrials AT tanlitee challengesforqualityassuranceoftargetvolumedelineationinclinicaltrials AT dukesimon challengesforqualityassuranceoftargetvolumedelineationinclinicaltrials AT ngwaitong challengesforqualityassuranceoftargetvolumedelineationinclinicaltrials |