Cargando…

Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials

In recent years, new radiotherapy techniques have emerged that aim to improve treatment outcome and reduce toxicity. The standard method of evaluating such techniques is to conduct large scale multicenter clinical trials, often across continents. A major challenge for such trials is quality assuranc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Amy Tien Yee, Tan, Li Tee, Duke, Simon, Ng, Wai-Tong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28993798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00221
_version_ 1783267852808093696
author Chang, Amy Tien Yee
Tan, Li Tee
Duke, Simon
Ng, Wai-Tong
author_facet Chang, Amy Tien Yee
Tan, Li Tee
Duke, Simon
Ng, Wai-Tong
author_sort Chang, Amy Tien Yee
collection PubMed
description In recent years, new radiotherapy techniques have emerged that aim to improve treatment outcome and reduce toxicity. The standard method of evaluating such techniques is to conduct large scale multicenter clinical trials, often across continents. A major challenge for such trials is quality assurance to ensure consistency of treatment across all participating centers. Analyses from previous studies have shown that poor compliance and protocol violation have a significant adverse effect on treatment outcomes. The results of the clinical trials may, therefore, be confounded by poor quality radiotherapy. Target volume delineation (TVD) is one of the most critical steps in the radiotherapy process. Many studies have shown large inter-observer variations in contouring, both within and outside of clinical trials. High precision techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided brachytherapy, and stereotactic radiotherapy have steep dose gradients, and errors in contouring may lead to inadequate dose to the tumor and consequently, reduce the chance of cure. Similarly, variation in organ at risk delineation will make it difficult to evaluate dose response for toxicity. This article reviews the literature on TVD variability and its impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes. The implications for quality assurance in clinical trials are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5622143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56221432017-10-09 Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials Chang, Amy Tien Yee Tan, Li Tee Duke, Simon Ng, Wai-Tong Front Oncol Oncology In recent years, new radiotherapy techniques have emerged that aim to improve treatment outcome and reduce toxicity. The standard method of evaluating such techniques is to conduct large scale multicenter clinical trials, often across continents. A major challenge for such trials is quality assurance to ensure consistency of treatment across all participating centers. Analyses from previous studies have shown that poor compliance and protocol violation have a significant adverse effect on treatment outcomes. The results of the clinical trials may, therefore, be confounded by poor quality radiotherapy. Target volume delineation (TVD) is one of the most critical steps in the radiotherapy process. Many studies have shown large inter-observer variations in contouring, both within and outside of clinical trials. High precision techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided brachytherapy, and stereotactic radiotherapy have steep dose gradients, and errors in contouring may lead to inadequate dose to the tumor and consequently, reduce the chance of cure. Similarly, variation in organ at risk delineation will make it difficult to evaluate dose response for toxicity. This article reviews the literature on TVD variability and its impact on dosimetry and clinical outcomes. The implications for quality assurance in clinical trials are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5622143/ /pubmed/28993798 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00221 Text en Copyright © 2017 Chang, Tan, Duke and Ng. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chang, Amy Tien Yee
Tan, Li Tee
Duke, Simon
Ng, Wai-Tong
Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials
title Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials
title_full Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials
title_short Challenges for Quality Assurance of Target Volume Delineation in Clinical Trials
title_sort challenges for quality assurance of target volume delineation in clinical trials
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28993798
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00221
work_keys_str_mv AT changamytienyee challengesforqualityassuranceoftargetvolumedelineationinclinicaltrials
AT tanlitee challengesforqualityassuranceoftargetvolumedelineationinclinicaltrials
AT dukesimon challengesforqualityassuranceoftargetvolumedelineationinclinicaltrials
AT ngwaitong challengesforqualityassuranceoftargetvolumedelineationinclinicaltrials