Cargando…
Quality of perinatal care services from the user’s perspective: a Dutch study applies the World Health Organization’s responsiveness concept
BACKGROUND: The concept of responsiveness was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) to address non-clinical aspects of service quality in an internationally comparable way. Responsiveness is defined as aspects of the way individuals are treated and the environment in which they are treat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1464-8 |
_version_ | 1783267903176441856 |
---|---|
author | van der Kooy, Jacoba Birnie, Erwin Valentine, Nicole B. de Graaf, Johanna P. Denktas, Semiha Steegers, Eric A. P. Bonsel, Gouke J. |
author_facet | van der Kooy, Jacoba Birnie, Erwin Valentine, Nicole B. de Graaf, Johanna P. Denktas, Semiha Steegers, Eric A. P. Bonsel, Gouke J. |
author_sort | van der Kooy, Jacoba |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The concept of responsiveness was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) to address non-clinical aspects of service quality in an internationally comparable way. Responsiveness is defined as aspects of the way individuals are treated and the environment in which they are treated during health system interactions. The aim of this study is to assess responsiveness outcomes, their importance and factors influencing responsiveness outcomes during the antenatal and delivery phases of perinatal care. METHOD: The Responsiveness in Perinatal and Obstetric Health Care Questionnaire was developed in 2009/10 based on the eight-domain WHO concept and the World Health Survey questionnaire. After ethical approval, a total of 171 women, who were 2 weeks postpartum, were recruited from three primary care midwifery practices in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, using face-to-face interviews. We dichotomized the original five ordinal response categories for responsiveness attainment as ‘poor’ and good responsiveness and analyzed the ranking of the domain performance and importance according to frequency scores. We used a series of independent variables related to health services and users’ personal background characteristics in multiple logistic regression analyses to explain responsiveness. RESULTS: Poor responsiveness outcomes ranged from 5.9% to 31.7% for the antenatal phase and from 9.7% to 27.1% for the delivery phase. Overall for both phases, ‘respect for persons’ (Autonomy, Dignity, Communication and Confidentiality) domains performed better and were judged to be more important than ‘client orientation’ domains (Choice and Continuity, Prompt Attention, Quality of Basic Amenities, Social Consideration). On the whole, responsiveness was explained more by health-care and health related issues than personal characteristics. CONCLUSION: To improve responsiveness outcomes caregivers should focus on domains in the category ‘client orientation’. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1464-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5622418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56224182017-10-11 Quality of perinatal care services from the user’s perspective: a Dutch study applies the World Health Organization’s responsiveness concept van der Kooy, Jacoba Birnie, Erwin Valentine, Nicole B. de Graaf, Johanna P. Denktas, Semiha Steegers, Eric A. P. Bonsel, Gouke J. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The concept of responsiveness was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) to address non-clinical aspects of service quality in an internationally comparable way. Responsiveness is defined as aspects of the way individuals are treated and the environment in which they are treated during health system interactions. The aim of this study is to assess responsiveness outcomes, their importance and factors influencing responsiveness outcomes during the antenatal and delivery phases of perinatal care. METHOD: The Responsiveness in Perinatal and Obstetric Health Care Questionnaire was developed in 2009/10 based on the eight-domain WHO concept and the World Health Survey questionnaire. After ethical approval, a total of 171 women, who were 2 weeks postpartum, were recruited from three primary care midwifery practices in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, using face-to-face interviews. We dichotomized the original five ordinal response categories for responsiveness attainment as ‘poor’ and good responsiveness and analyzed the ranking of the domain performance and importance according to frequency scores. We used a series of independent variables related to health services and users’ personal background characteristics in multiple logistic regression analyses to explain responsiveness. RESULTS: Poor responsiveness outcomes ranged from 5.9% to 31.7% for the antenatal phase and from 9.7% to 27.1% for the delivery phase. Overall for both phases, ‘respect for persons’ (Autonomy, Dignity, Communication and Confidentiality) domains performed better and were judged to be more important than ‘client orientation’ domains (Choice and Continuity, Prompt Attention, Quality of Basic Amenities, Social Consideration). On the whole, responsiveness was explained more by health-care and health related issues than personal characteristics. CONCLUSION: To improve responsiveness outcomes caregivers should focus on domains in the category ‘client orientation’. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1464-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5622418/ /pubmed/28962611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1464-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Kooy, Jacoba Birnie, Erwin Valentine, Nicole B. de Graaf, Johanna P. Denktas, Semiha Steegers, Eric A. P. Bonsel, Gouke J. Quality of perinatal care services from the user’s perspective: a Dutch study applies the World Health Organization’s responsiveness concept |
title | Quality of perinatal care services from the user’s perspective: a Dutch study applies the World Health Organization’s responsiveness concept |
title_full | Quality of perinatal care services from the user’s perspective: a Dutch study applies the World Health Organization’s responsiveness concept |
title_fullStr | Quality of perinatal care services from the user’s perspective: a Dutch study applies the World Health Organization’s responsiveness concept |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of perinatal care services from the user’s perspective: a Dutch study applies the World Health Organization’s responsiveness concept |
title_short | Quality of perinatal care services from the user’s perspective: a Dutch study applies the World Health Organization’s responsiveness concept |
title_sort | quality of perinatal care services from the user’s perspective: a dutch study applies the world health organization’s responsiveness concept |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1464-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderkooyjacoba qualityofperinatalcareservicesfromtheusersperspectiveadutchstudyappliestheworldhealthorganizationsresponsivenessconcept AT birnieerwin qualityofperinatalcareservicesfromtheusersperspectiveadutchstudyappliestheworldhealthorganizationsresponsivenessconcept AT valentinenicoleb qualityofperinatalcareservicesfromtheusersperspectiveadutchstudyappliestheworldhealthorganizationsresponsivenessconcept AT degraafjohannap qualityofperinatalcareservicesfromtheusersperspectiveadutchstudyappliestheworldhealthorganizationsresponsivenessconcept AT denktassemiha qualityofperinatalcareservicesfromtheusersperspectiveadutchstudyappliestheworldhealthorganizationsresponsivenessconcept AT steegersericap qualityofperinatalcareservicesfromtheusersperspectiveadutchstudyappliestheworldhealthorganizationsresponsivenessconcept AT bonselgoukej qualityofperinatalcareservicesfromtheusersperspectiveadutchstudyappliestheworldhealthorganizationsresponsivenessconcept |