Cargando…

Validation of the imperial college surgical assessment device for spinal anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, technical proficiency for spinal anesthesia has been assessed using observational scales such as global rating scales or task specific checklists. However more objective metrics are required in order to improve novice’s training programs. The aim of this study is to valida...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corvetto, Marcia A., Fuentes, Carlos, Araneda, Andrea, Achurra, Pablo, Miranda, Pablo, Viviani, Paola, Altermatt, Fernando R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0422-3
_version_ 1783267917035470848
author Corvetto, Marcia A.
Fuentes, Carlos
Araneda, Andrea
Achurra, Pablo
Miranda, Pablo
Viviani, Paola
Altermatt, Fernando R.
author_facet Corvetto, Marcia A.
Fuentes, Carlos
Araneda, Andrea
Achurra, Pablo
Miranda, Pablo
Viviani, Paola
Altermatt, Fernando R.
author_sort Corvetto, Marcia A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditionally, technical proficiency for spinal anesthesia has been assessed using observational scales such as global rating scales or task specific checklists. However more objective metrics are required in order to improve novice’s training programs. The aim of this study is to validate the hand motion analysis of the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) in a simulated model of spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Three groups of physicians with different levels of experience were video recorded performing a spinal anesthesia in a simulated lumbar puncture torso. Participants’ technical performance was assessed with ICSAD, a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a specific Checklist. Differences between the 3 groups were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons. Spearman correlation coefficient between ICSAD variables and the scores of the observational scales were calculated to establish concurrent validity. RESULTS: Thirty subjects participated in the study: ten novice (first year residents), 10 intermediate (third year residents) and 10 experts (attending anesthesiologists). GRS scores were significantly higher in experts, than intermediates and novices. Regarding total path length, number of movements and procedural time measured with ICSAD, all groups had significant differences between them (p = 0.026, p = 0.045 and p = 0.005 respectively). Spearman correlation coefficient was −0,46 (p = 0.012) between total path length measured with ICSAD and GRS scores. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first validation study of ICSAD as an assessment tool for spinal anesthesia in a simulated model. Using ICSAD can discriminate proficiency between expert and novices and correlates with previously validated GRS. Its use in the assessment of spinal anesthesia proficiency provides complementary data to existing tools. Our results could be used to design future training programs with reliable goals to accomplish. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-017-0422-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5622479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56224792017-10-11 Validation of the imperial college surgical assessment device for spinal anesthesia Corvetto, Marcia A. Fuentes, Carlos Araneda, Andrea Achurra, Pablo Miranda, Pablo Viviani, Paola Altermatt, Fernando R. BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Traditionally, technical proficiency for spinal anesthesia has been assessed using observational scales such as global rating scales or task specific checklists. However more objective metrics are required in order to improve novice’s training programs. The aim of this study is to validate the hand motion analysis of the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device (ICSAD) in a simulated model of spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Three groups of physicians with different levels of experience were video recorded performing a spinal anesthesia in a simulated lumbar puncture torso. Participants’ technical performance was assessed with ICSAD, a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a specific Checklist. Differences between the 3 groups were determined by Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons. Spearman correlation coefficient between ICSAD variables and the scores of the observational scales were calculated to establish concurrent validity. RESULTS: Thirty subjects participated in the study: ten novice (first year residents), 10 intermediate (third year residents) and 10 experts (attending anesthesiologists). GRS scores were significantly higher in experts, than intermediates and novices. Regarding total path length, number of movements and procedural time measured with ICSAD, all groups had significant differences between them (p = 0.026, p = 0.045 and p = 0.005 respectively). Spearman correlation coefficient was −0,46 (p = 0.012) between total path length measured with ICSAD and GRS scores. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first validation study of ICSAD as an assessment tool for spinal anesthesia in a simulated model. Using ICSAD can discriminate proficiency between expert and novices and correlates with previously validated GRS. Its use in the assessment of spinal anesthesia proficiency provides complementary data to existing tools. Our results could be used to design future training programs with reliable goals to accomplish. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12871-017-0422-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5622479/ /pubmed/28962548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0422-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Corvetto, Marcia A.
Fuentes, Carlos
Araneda, Andrea
Achurra, Pablo
Miranda, Pablo
Viviani, Paola
Altermatt, Fernando R.
Validation of the imperial college surgical assessment device for spinal anesthesia
title Validation of the imperial college surgical assessment device for spinal anesthesia
title_full Validation of the imperial college surgical assessment device for spinal anesthesia
title_fullStr Validation of the imperial college surgical assessment device for spinal anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the imperial college surgical assessment device for spinal anesthesia
title_short Validation of the imperial college surgical assessment device for spinal anesthesia
title_sort validation of the imperial college surgical assessment device for spinal anesthesia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962548
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0422-3
work_keys_str_mv AT corvettomarciaa validationoftheimperialcollegesurgicalassessmentdeviceforspinalanesthesia
AT fuentescarlos validationoftheimperialcollegesurgicalassessmentdeviceforspinalanesthesia
AT aranedaandrea validationoftheimperialcollegesurgicalassessmentdeviceforspinalanesthesia
AT achurrapablo validationoftheimperialcollegesurgicalassessmentdeviceforspinalanesthesia
AT mirandapablo validationoftheimperialcollegesurgicalassessmentdeviceforspinalanesthesia
AT vivianipaola validationoftheimperialcollegesurgicalassessmentdeviceforspinalanesthesia
AT altermattfernandor validationoftheimperialcollegesurgicalassessmentdeviceforspinalanesthesia