Cargando…

Trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents

BACKGROUND: The literature did not show clearly if a correlation between trunk and facial asymmetry exists. The aim of this study was to verify the association between trunk and facial asymmetries, and trunk and facial sagittal configuration in adolescents. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional screeni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arienti, Chiara, Villafañe, Jorge Hugo, Donzelli, Sabrina, Zaina, Fabio, Buraschi, Riccardo, Negrini, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0280-y
_version_ 1783267932968583168
author Arienti, Chiara
Villafañe, Jorge Hugo
Donzelli, Sabrina
Zaina, Fabio
Buraschi, Riccardo
Negrini, Stefano
author_facet Arienti, Chiara
Villafañe, Jorge Hugo
Donzelli, Sabrina
Zaina, Fabio
Buraschi, Riccardo
Negrini, Stefano
author_sort Arienti, Chiara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The literature did not show clearly if a correlation between trunk and facial asymmetry exists. The aim of this study was to verify the association between trunk and facial asymmetries, and trunk and facial sagittal configuration in adolescents. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional screening study. It was carried out in a small town in Northern Italy, from February to April 2014. Healthy children met the inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were subjects with physical and cognitive disability, genetic disease, and polymorphism. All subjects underwent a three phases for postural screening program. RESULTS: 1029 healthy children were 491 females and 538 males with mean age: 12 (range 11–16) years. The association of facial and trunk asymmetry had a point prevalence rate around 1% for the various regions of the spine, the association on the sagittal plane of almost 1.3% for hyperkyphosis and hyperlordosis. Overall, results showed a very low sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of facial anomalies for trunk asymmetry and sagittal spinal posture. CONCLUSION: While correlations between jaw position and body posture for cervical spine can exist, our study denied association with trunk and back in a general population: postural compensatory mechanism may have minimized the effects of one area on the other, if any existed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5622548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56225482017-10-11 Trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents Arienti, Chiara Villafañe, Jorge Hugo Donzelli, Sabrina Zaina, Fabio Buraschi, Riccardo Negrini, Stefano Eur J Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The literature did not show clearly if a correlation between trunk and facial asymmetry exists. The aim of this study was to verify the association between trunk and facial asymmetries, and trunk and facial sagittal configuration in adolescents. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional screening study. It was carried out in a small town in Northern Italy, from February to April 2014. Healthy children met the inclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were subjects with physical and cognitive disability, genetic disease, and polymorphism. All subjects underwent a three phases for postural screening program. RESULTS: 1029 healthy children were 491 females and 538 males with mean age: 12 (range 11–16) years. The association of facial and trunk asymmetry had a point prevalence rate around 1% for the various regions of the spine, the association on the sagittal plane of almost 1.3% for hyperkyphosis and hyperlordosis. Overall, results showed a very low sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of facial anomalies for trunk asymmetry and sagittal spinal posture. CONCLUSION: While correlations between jaw position and body posture for cervical spine can exist, our study denied association with trunk and back in a general population: postural compensatory mechanism may have minimized the effects of one area on the other, if any existed. BioMed Central 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5622548/ /pubmed/28962640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0280-y Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Arienti, Chiara
Villafañe, Jorge Hugo
Donzelli, Sabrina
Zaina, Fabio
Buraschi, Riccardo
Negrini, Stefano
Trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents
title Trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents
title_full Trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents
title_fullStr Trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents
title_short Trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents
title_sort trunk and craniofacial asymmetry are not associated in the general population: a cross-sectional study of 1029 adolescents
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28962640
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-017-0280-y
work_keys_str_mv AT arientichiara trunkandcraniofacialasymmetryarenotassociatedinthegeneralpopulationacrosssectionalstudyof1029adolescents
AT villafanejorgehugo trunkandcraniofacialasymmetryarenotassociatedinthegeneralpopulationacrosssectionalstudyof1029adolescents
AT donzellisabrina trunkandcraniofacialasymmetryarenotassociatedinthegeneralpopulationacrosssectionalstudyof1029adolescents
AT zainafabio trunkandcraniofacialasymmetryarenotassociatedinthegeneralpopulationacrosssectionalstudyof1029adolescents
AT buraschiriccardo trunkandcraniofacialasymmetryarenotassociatedinthegeneralpopulationacrosssectionalstudyof1029adolescents
AT negrinistefano trunkandcraniofacialasymmetryarenotassociatedinthegeneralpopulationacrosssectionalstudyof1029adolescents