Cargando…
Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S.
Dietary recommendations regarding consumption of muscle foods, such as red meat, processed meat, poultry or fish, largely rely on current dietary intake assessment methods. This narrative review summarizes how U.S. intake values for various types of muscle foods are grouped and estimated via methods...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28926963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9091027 |
_version_ | 1783267987161088000 |
---|---|
author | Gifford, Cody L. O’Connor, Lauren E. Campbell, Wayne W. Woerner, Dale R. Belk, Keith E. |
author_facet | Gifford, Cody L. O’Connor, Lauren E. Campbell, Wayne W. Woerner, Dale R. Belk, Keith E. |
author_sort | Gifford, Cody L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dietary recommendations regarding consumption of muscle foods, such as red meat, processed meat, poultry or fish, largely rely on current dietary intake assessment methods. This narrative review summarizes how U.S. intake values for various types of muscle foods are grouped and estimated via methods that include: (1) food frequency questionnaires; (2) food disappearance data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service; and (3) dietary recall information from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. These reported methods inconsistently classify muscle foods into groups, such as those previously listed, which creates discrepancies in estimated intakes. Researchers who classify muscle foods into these groups do not consistently considered nutrient content, in turn leading to implications of scientific conclusions and dietary recommendations. Consequentially, these factors demonstrate a need for a more universal muscle food classification system. Further specification to this system would improve accuracy and precision in which researchers can classify muscle foods in nutrition research. Future multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to develop a new classification system via systematic review protocol of current literature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5622787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56227872017-10-05 Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S. Gifford, Cody L. O’Connor, Lauren E. Campbell, Wayne W. Woerner, Dale R. Belk, Keith E. Nutrients Review Dietary recommendations regarding consumption of muscle foods, such as red meat, processed meat, poultry or fish, largely rely on current dietary intake assessment methods. This narrative review summarizes how U.S. intake values for various types of muscle foods are grouped and estimated via methods that include: (1) food frequency questionnaires; (2) food disappearance data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service; and (3) dietary recall information from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. These reported methods inconsistently classify muscle foods into groups, such as those previously listed, which creates discrepancies in estimated intakes. Researchers who classify muscle foods into these groups do not consistently considered nutrient content, in turn leading to implications of scientific conclusions and dietary recommendations. Consequentially, these factors demonstrate a need for a more universal muscle food classification system. Further specification to this system would improve accuracy and precision in which researchers can classify muscle foods in nutrition research. Future multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to develop a new classification system via systematic review protocol of current literature. MDPI 2017-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5622787/ /pubmed/28926963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9091027 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Gifford, Cody L. O’Connor, Lauren E. Campbell, Wayne W. Woerner, Dale R. Belk, Keith E. Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S. |
title | Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S. |
title_full | Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S. |
title_fullStr | Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S. |
title_full_unstemmed | Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S. |
title_short | Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S. |
title_sort | broad and inconsistent muscle food classification is problematic for dietary guidance in the u.s. |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28926963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9091027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giffordcodyl broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus AT oconnorlaurene broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus AT campbellwaynew broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus AT woernerdaler broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus AT belkkeithe broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus |