Cargando…

Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S.

Dietary recommendations regarding consumption of muscle foods, such as red meat, processed meat, poultry or fish, largely rely on current dietary intake assessment methods. This narrative review summarizes how U.S. intake values for various types of muscle foods are grouped and estimated via methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gifford, Cody L., O’Connor, Lauren E., Campbell, Wayne W., Woerner, Dale R., Belk, Keith E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28926963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9091027
_version_ 1783267987161088000
author Gifford, Cody L.
O’Connor, Lauren E.
Campbell, Wayne W.
Woerner, Dale R.
Belk, Keith E.
author_facet Gifford, Cody L.
O’Connor, Lauren E.
Campbell, Wayne W.
Woerner, Dale R.
Belk, Keith E.
author_sort Gifford, Cody L.
collection PubMed
description Dietary recommendations regarding consumption of muscle foods, such as red meat, processed meat, poultry or fish, largely rely on current dietary intake assessment methods. This narrative review summarizes how U.S. intake values for various types of muscle foods are grouped and estimated via methods that include: (1) food frequency questionnaires; (2) food disappearance data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service; and (3) dietary recall information from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. These reported methods inconsistently classify muscle foods into groups, such as those previously listed, which creates discrepancies in estimated intakes. Researchers who classify muscle foods into these groups do not consistently considered nutrient content, in turn leading to implications of scientific conclusions and dietary recommendations. Consequentially, these factors demonstrate a need for a more universal muscle food classification system. Further specification to this system would improve accuracy and precision in which researchers can classify muscle foods in nutrition research. Future multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to develop a new classification system via systematic review protocol of current literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5622787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56227872017-10-05 Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S. Gifford, Cody L. O’Connor, Lauren E. Campbell, Wayne W. Woerner, Dale R. Belk, Keith E. Nutrients Review Dietary recommendations regarding consumption of muscle foods, such as red meat, processed meat, poultry or fish, largely rely on current dietary intake assessment methods. This narrative review summarizes how U.S. intake values for various types of muscle foods are grouped and estimated via methods that include: (1) food frequency questionnaires; (2) food disappearance data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service; and (3) dietary recall information from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. These reported methods inconsistently classify muscle foods into groups, such as those previously listed, which creates discrepancies in estimated intakes. Researchers who classify muscle foods into these groups do not consistently considered nutrient content, in turn leading to implications of scientific conclusions and dietary recommendations. Consequentially, these factors demonstrate a need for a more universal muscle food classification system. Further specification to this system would improve accuracy and precision in which researchers can classify muscle foods in nutrition research. Future multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to develop a new classification system via systematic review protocol of current literature. MDPI 2017-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5622787/ /pubmed/28926963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9091027 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gifford, Cody L.
O’Connor, Lauren E.
Campbell, Wayne W.
Woerner, Dale R.
Belk, Keith E.
Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S.
title Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S.
title_full Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S.
title_fullStr Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S.
title_full_unstemmed Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S.
title_short Broad and Inconsistent Muscle Food Classification Is Problematic for Dietary Guidance in the U.S.
title_sort broad and inconsistent muscle food classification is problematic for dietary guidance in the u.s.
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5622787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28926963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu9091027
work_keys_str_mv AT giffordcodyl broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus
AT oconnorlaurene broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus
AT campbellwaynew broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus
AT woernerdaler broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus
AT belkkeithe broadandinconsistentmusclefoodclassificationisproblematicfordietaryguidanceintheus