Cargando…

Benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western Spain

The aim of this study was to describe the status of body condition score (BCS), hock injuries prevalence, locomotion and body hygiene score as animal welfare measures in 73 free-stall dairy cattle farms in Lugo (Spain). A benchmarking process was established across farms: (1) the animal-based indica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trillo, Yolanda, Quintela, Luis Angel, Barrio, Mónica, Becerra, Juan José, Peña, Ana Isabel, Vigo, Marcos, Garcia Herradon, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5623328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2016-000178
_version_ 1783268060792094720
author Trillo, Yolanda
Quintela, Luis Angel
Barrio, Mónica
Becerra, Juan José
Peña, Ana Isabel
Vigo, Marcos
Garcia Herradon, Pedro
author_facet Trillo, Yolanda
Quintela, Luis Angel
Barrio, Mónica
Becerra, Juan José
Peña, Ana Isabel
Vigo, Marcos
Garcia Herradon, Pedro
author_sort Trillo, Yolanda
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to describe the status of body condition score (BCS), hock injuries prevalence, locomotion and body hygiene score as animal welfare measures in 73 free-stall dairy cattle farms in Lugo (Spain). A benchmarking process was established across farms: (1) the animal-based indicators were ordered from low to high values; (2) The farms were classified into three categories based on the number of indicators within less than the 25th percentile, 25th to 75th percentile and above the 75th percentile. The median prevalence of unsuitable BCS, hock injuries and clinical lameness was (median (range)) 51.7 per cent (13.3 to 89.5 per cent), 40.0 per cent (7.0per cent to 100 per cent) and 9.0 per cent (0per cent to 60.0 per cent) respectively. The dirtiness of the cow’s coat had a high prevalence (73.0 per cent (37.5per cent to 100 per cent)). Most farms did not display consistently good or poor animal-based indicators and each farm had its own set of strong and weak points. Moreover, facilities design and management practices were described to understand source of the observations made of the cows. The incidence of overstocking was 31.5 per cent for stalls and 26.0 per cent for headlocks. The front lunge space was reduced (<90 cm) on most dairies (90.4 per cent). Signs of poor natural ventilation (cobwebs or humidity on the roof) and ammonia odour were observed on 32.8 per cent and 85.0 per cent of the barns totally closed or with a side openingless than 50 per cent of the wall height. The milking parlour was designed with two or more turns more than 90° (9.3 per cent), and failed to allow cows to see the parlour before entering (45.2 per cent). On 52.0 per cent of dairies, more than 15 per cent of the cows had to be forcefully moved into the milking parlour. In conclusion, there was a big variation in the animal welfare levels within and across farms and they could benefit from others by changing management practices related to facilities and herds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5623328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56233282017-10-10 Benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western Spain Trillo, Yolanda Quintela, Luis Angel Barrio, Mónica Becerra, Juan José Peña, Ana Isabel Vigo, Marcos Garcia Herradon, Pedro Vet Rec Open Drescriptive Study The aim of this study was to describe the status of body condition score (BCS), hock injuries prevalence, locomotion and body hygiene score as animal welfare measures in 73 free-stall dairy cattle farms in Lugo (Spain). A benchmarking process was established across farms: (1) the animal-based indicators were ordered from low to high values; (2) The farms were classified into three categories based on the number of indicators within less than the 25th percentile, 25th to 75th percentile and above the 75th percentile. The median prevalence of unsuitable BCS, hock injuries and clinical lameness was (median (range)) 51.7 per cent (13.3 to 89.5 per cent), 40.0 per cent (7.0per cent to 100 per cent) and 9.0 per cent (0per cent to 60.0 per cent) respectively. The dirtiness of the cow’s coat had a high prevalence (73.0 per cent (37.5per cent to 100 per cent)). Most farms did not display consistently good or poor animal-based indicators and each farm had its own set of strong and weak points. Moreover, facilities design and management practices were described to understand source of the observations made of the cows. The incidence of overstocking was 31.5 per cent for stalls and 26.0 per cent for headlocks. The front lunge space was reduced (<90 cm) on most dairies (90.4 per cent). Signs of poor natural ventilation (cobwebs or humidity on the roof) and ammonia odour were observed on 32.8 per cent and 85.0 per cent of the barns totally closed or with a side openingless than 50 per cent of the wall height. The milking parlour was designed with two or more turns more than 90° (9.3 per cent), and failed to allow cows to see the parlour before entering (45.2 per cent). On 52.0 per cent of dairies, more than 15 per cent of the cows had to be forcefully moved into the milking parlour. In conclusion, there was a big variation in the animal welfare levels within and across farms and they could benefit from others by changing management practices related to facilities and herds. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5623328/ /pubmed/29018530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2016-000178 Text en © British Veterinary Association (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Drescriptive Study
Trillo, Yolanda
Quintela, Luis Angel
Barrio, Mónica
Becerra, Juan José
Peña, Ana Isabel
Vigo, Marcos
Garcia Herradon, Pedro
Benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western Spain
title Benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western Spain
title_full Benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western Spain
title_fullStr Benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western Spain
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western Spain
title_short Benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western Spain
title_sort benchmarking welfare indicators in 73 free-stall dairy farms in north-western spain
topic Drescriptive Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5623328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2016-000178
work_keys_str_mv AT trilloyolanda benchmarkingwelfareindicatorsin73freestalldairyfarmsinnorthwesternspain
AT quintelaluisangel benchmarkingwelfareindicatorsin73freestalldairyfarmsinnorthwesternspain
AT barriomonica benchmarkingwelfareindicatorsin73freestalldairyfarmsinnorthwesternspain
AT becerrajuanjose benchmarkingwelfareindicatorsin73freestalldairyfarmsinnorthwesternspain
AT penaanaisabel benchmarkingwelfareindicatorsin73freestalldairyfarmsinnorthwesternspain
AT vigomarcos benchmarkingwelfareindicatorsin73freestalldairyfarmsinnorthwesternspain
AT garciaherradonpedro benchmarkingwelfareindicatorsin73freestalldairyfarmsinnorthwesternspain