Cargando…

Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review

OBJECTIVES: Family involvement is strongly recommended in clinical guidelines but suffers from poor implementation. To explore this topic at a conceptual level, a multidisciplinary review team including academics, clinicians and individuals with lived experience undertook a review to explore the the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dirik, Aysegul, Sandhu, Sima, Giacco, Domenico, Barrett, Katherine, Bennison, Gerry, Collinson, Sue, Priebe, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5623469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28963308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017680
_version_ 1783268094352818176
author Dirik, Aysegul
Sandhu, Sima
Giacco, Domenico
Barrett, Katherine
Bennison, Gerry
Collinson, Sue
Priebe, Stefan
author_facet Dirik, Aysegul
Sandhu, Sima
Giacco, Domenico
Barrett, Katherine
Bennison, Gerry
Collinson, Sue
Priebe, Stefan
author_sort Dirik, Aysegul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Family involvement is strongly recommended in clinical guidelines but suffers from poor implementation. To explore this topic at a conceptual level, a multidisciplinary review team including academics, clinicians and individuals with lived experience undertook a review to explore the theoretical background of family involvement models in acute mental health treatment and how this relates to their delivery. DESIGN: A conceptual review was undertaken, including a systematic search and narrative synthesis. Included family models were mapped onto the most commonly referenced underlying theories: the diathesis–stress model, systems theories and postmodern theories of mental health. Common components of the models were summarised and compared. Lastly, a thematic analysis was undertaken to explore the role of patients and families in the delivery of the approaches. SETTING: General adult acute mental health treatment. RESULTS: Six distinct family involvement models were identified: Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models, ERIC (Equipe Rapide d’Intervention de Crise), Family Psychoeducation Models, Family Systems Approach, Open Dialogue and the Somerset Model. Findings indicated that despite wide variation in the theoretical models underlying family involvement models, there were many commonalities in their components, such as a focus on communication, language use and joint decision-making. Thematic analysis of the role of patients and families identified several issues for implementation. This included potential harms that could emerge during delivery of the models, such as imposing linear ‘patient–carer’ relationships and the risk of perceived coercion. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that future staff training may benefit from discussing the chosen family involvement model within the context of other theories of mental health. This may help to clarify the underlying purpose of family involvement and address the diverse needs and world views of patients, families and professionals in acute settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5623469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56234692017-10-10 Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review Dirik, Aysegul Sandhu, Sima Giacco, Domenico Barrett, Katherine Bennison, Gerry Collinson, Sue Priebe, Stefan BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: Family involvement is strongly recommended in clinical guidelines but suffers from poor implementation. To explore this topic at a conceptual level, a multidisciplinary review team including academics, clinicians and individuals with lived experience undertook a review to explore the theoretical background of family involvement models in acute mental health treatment and how this relates to their delivery. DESIGN: A conceptual review was undertaken, including a systematic search and narrative synthesis. Included family models were mapped onto the most commonly referenced underlying theories: the diathesis–stress model, systems theories and postmodern theories of mental health. Common components of the models were summarised and compared. Lastly, a thematic analysis was undertaken to explore the role of patients and families in the delivery of the approaches. SETTING: General adult acute mental health treatment. RESULTS: Six distinct family involvement models were identified: Calgary Family Assessment and Intervention Models, ERIC (Equipe Rapide d’Intervention de Crise), Family Psychoeducation Models, Family Systems Approach, Open Dialogue and the Somerset Model. Findings indicated that despite wide variation in the theoretical models underlying family involvement models, there were many commonalities in their components, such as a focus on communication, language use and joint decision-making. Thematic analysis of the role of patients and families identified several issues for implementation. This included potential harms that could emerge during delivery of the models, such as imposing linear ‘patient–carer’ relationships and the risk of perceived coercion. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that future staff training may benefit from discussing the chosen family involvement model within the context of other theories of mental health. This may help to clarify the underlying purpose of family involvement and address the diverse needs and world views of patients, families and professionals in acute settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5623469/ /pubmed/28963308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017680 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Dirik, Aysegul
Sandhu, Sima
Giacco, Domenico
Barrett, Katherine
Bennison, Gerry
Collinson, Sue
Priebe, Stefan
Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review
title Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review
title_full Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review
title_fullStr Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review
title_full_unstemmed Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review
title_short Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review
title_sort why involve families in acute mental healthcare? a collaborative conceptual review
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5623469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28963308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017680
work_keys_str_mv AT dirikaysegul whyinvolvefamiliesinacutementalhealthcareacollaborativeconceptualreview
AT sandhusima whyinvolvefamiliesinacutementalhealthcareacollaborativeconceptualreview
AT giaccodomenico whyinvolvefamiliesinacutementalhealthcareacollaborativeconceptualreview
AT barrettkatherine whyinvolvefamiliesinacutementalhealthcareacollaborativeconceptualreview
AT bennisongerry whyinvolvefamiliesinacutementalhealthcareacollaborativeconceptualreview
AT collinsonsue whyinvolvefamiliesinacutementalhealthcareacollaborativeconceptualreview
AT priebestefan whyinvolvefamiliesinacutementalhealthcareacollaborativeconceptualreview