Cargando…

Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA

OBJECTIVE: To develop a simplified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (sFNAS) that will highly correlate with scores ≥8 and ≥12 in infants being assessed with the FNAS. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective analysis involving 367 patients admitted to two level IV neonata...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomez Pomar, Enrique, Finnegan, Loretta P, Devlin, Lori, Bada, Henrietta, Concina, Vanessa A, Ibonia, Katrina T, Westgate, Philip M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5623549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28963285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016176
_version_ 1783268114222284800
author Gomez Pomar, Enrique
Finnegan, Loretta P
Devlin, Lori
Bada, Henrietta
Concina, Vanessa A
Ibonia, Katrina T
Westgate, Philip M
author_facet Gomez Pomar, Enrique
Finnegan, Loretta P
Devlin, Lori
Bada, Henrietta
Concina, Vanessa A
Ibonia, Katrina T
Westgate, Philip M
author_sort Gomez Pomar, Enrique
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop a simplified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (sFNAS) that will highly correlate with scores ≥8 and ≥12 in infants being assessed with the FNAS. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective analysis involving 367 patients admitted to two level IV neonatal intensive care units with a total of 40 294 observations. Inclusion criteria included neonates with gestational age ≥37 0/7 weeks, who are being assessed for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) using the FNAS. Infants with a gestational age <37 weeks were excluded. METHODS: A linear regression model based on the original FNAS data from one institution was developed to determine optimal values for each item in the sFNAS. A backward elimination approach was used, removing the items that contributed least to the Pearson’s correlation. The sFNAS was then cross-validated with data from a second institution. RESULTS: Pearson’s correlation between the proposed sFNAS and the FNAS was 0.914. The optimal treatment cut-off values for the sFNAS were 6 and 10 to predict FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of these cut-off values to detect FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12 were 0.888 and 0.883 for a cut-off of 6, and 0.637 and 0.992 for a cut-off of 10, respectively. The sFNAS cross-validation resulted in a Pearson’s correlation of 0.908, sensitivity and specificity of 0.860 and 0.873 for a cut-off of 6, and 0.525 and 0.986 for a cut-off of 10, respectively. CONCLUSION: The sFNAS has a high statistical correlation with the FNAS, and it is cross-validated for the assessment of infants with NAS. It has excellent specificity and negative predictive value for identifying infants with FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5623549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56235492017-10-10 Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA Gomez Pomar, Enrique Finnegan, Loretta P Devlin, Lori Bada, Henrietta Concina, Vanessa A Ibonia, Katrina T Westgate, Philip M BMJ Open Paediatrics OBJECTIVE: To develop a simplified Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System (sFNAS) that will highly correlate with scores ≥8 and ≥12 in infants being assessed with the FNAS. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a retrospective analysis involving 367 patients admitted to two level IV neonatal intensive care units with a total of 40 294 observations. Inclusion criteria included neonates with gestational age ≥37 0/7 weeks, who are being assessed for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) using the FNAS. Infants with a gestational age <37 weeks were excluded. METHODS: A linear regression model based on the original FNAS data from one institution was developed to determine optimal values for each item in the sFNAS. A backward elimination approach was used, removing the items that contributed least to the Pearson’s correlation. The sFNAS was then cross-validated with data from a second institution. RESULTS: Pearson’s correlation between the proposed sFNAS and the FNAS was 0.914. The optimal treatment cut-off values for the sFNAS were 6 and 10 to predict FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of these cut-off values to detect FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12 were 0.888 and 0.883 for a cut-off of 6, and 0.637 and 0.992 for a cut-off of 10, respectively. The sFNAS cross-validation resulted in a Pearson’s correlation of 0.908, sensitivity and specificity of 0.860 and 0.873 for a cut-off of 6, and 0.525 and 0.986 for a cut-off of 10, respectively. CONCLUSION: The sFNAS has a high statistical correlation with the FNAS, and it is cross-validated for the assessment of infants with NAS. It has excellent specificity and negative predictive value for identifying infants with FNAS scores ≥8 and ≥12. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5623549/ /pubmed/28963285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016176 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Paediatrics
Gomez Pomar, Enrique
Finnegan, Loretta P
Devlin, Lori
Bada, Henrietta
Concina, Vanessa A
Ibonia, Katrina T
Westgate, Philip M
Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA
title Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA
title_full Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA
title_fullStr Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA
title_full_unstemmed Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA
title_short Simplification of the Finnegan Neonatal Abstinence Scoring System: retrospective study of two institutions in the USA
title_sort simplification of the finnegan neonatal abstinence scoring system: retrospective study of two institutions in the usa
topic Paediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5623549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28963285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016176
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezpomarenrique simplificationofthefinneganneonatalabstinencescoringsystemretrospectivestudyoftwoinstitutionsintheusa
AT finneganlorettap simplificationofthefinneganneonatalabstinencescoringsystemretrospectivestudyoftwoinstitutionsintheusa
AT devlinlori simplificationofthefinneganneonatalabstinencescoringsystemretrospectivestudyoftwoinstitutionsintheusa
AT badahenrietta simplificationofthefinneganneonatalabstinencescoringsystemretrospectivestudyoftwoinstitutionsintheusa
AT concinavanessaa simplificationofthefinneganneonatalabstinencescoringsystemretrospectivestudyoftwoinstitutionsintheusa
AT iboniakatrinat simplificationofthefinneganneonatalabstinencescoringsystemretrospectivestudyoftwoinstitutionsintheusa
AT westgatephilipm simplificationofthefinneganneonatalabstinencescoringsystemretrospectivestudyoftwoinstitutionsintheusa