Cargando…

The reversible P2Y(12) antagonist ACT‐246475 causes significantly less blood loss than ticagrelor at equivalent antithrombotic efficacy in rat

The P2Y(12) receptor is a validated target for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare two direct‐acting, reversible P2Y(12) antagonists, ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor, in a rat thrombosis model by simultaneous quan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rey, Markus, Kramberg, Markus, Hess, Patrick, Morrison, Keith, Ernst, Roland, Haag, Franck, Weber, Edgar, Clozel, Martine, Baumann, Martine, Caroff, Eva, Hubler, Francis, Riederer, Markus A., Steiner, Beat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28805949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.338
Descripción
Sumario:The P2Y(12) receptor is a validated target for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare two direct‐acting, reversible P2Y(12) antagonists, ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor, in a rat thrombosis model by simultaneous quantification of their antithrombotic efficacy and surgery‐induced blood loss. Blood flow velocity was assessed in the carotid artery after FeCl(3)‐induced thrombus formation using a Doppler flow probe. At the same time, blood loss after surgical wounding of the spleen was quantified. Continuous infusions of ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor prevented the injury‐induced reduction of blood flow in a dose‐dependent manner. High doses of both antagonists normalized blood flow and completely abolished thrombus formation as confirmed by histology. Intermediate doses restored baseline blood flow to ≥65%. However, ACT‐246475 caused significantly less increase of blood loss than ticagrelor; the difference in blood loss was 2.6‐fold (P < 0.01) at high doses and 2.7‐fold (P < 0.05) at intermediate doses. Potential reasons for this unexpected difference were explored by measuring the effects of ACT‐246475 and ticagrelor on vascular tone. At concentrations needed to achieve maximal antithrombotic efficacy, ticagrelor compared with ACT‐246475 significantly increased carotid blood flow velocity in vivo (P = 0.003), induced vasorelaxation of precontracted rat femoral arteries, and inhibited contraction of femoral artery induced by electrical field stimulation or by phenylephrine. Overall, ACT‐246475 showed a significantly wider therapeutic window than ticagrelor. The absence of vasodilatory effects due to high selectivity of ACT‐246475 for P2Y(12) provides potential arguments for the observed safety advantage of ACT‐246475 over ticagrelor.