Cargando…
Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide
The drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential between the fixed‐dose combinations of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir 90/400 mg for hepatitis C virus and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 200/25/25 mg for HIV was evaluated in a randomized, open‐label, single‐center, multiple‐dose, 3‐way, 6‐sequ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.353 |
_version_ | 1783268347562950656 |
---|---|
author | Custodio, Joseph M. Chuck, Susan K. Chu, Hoa Cao, Huyen Ma, Grace Flaherty, John Ling, John Kearney, Brian P. |
author_facet | Custodio, Joseph M. Chuck, Susan K. Chu, Hoa Cao, Huyen Ma, Grace Flaherty, John Ling, John Kearney, Brian P. |
author_sort | Custodio, Joseph M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential between the fixed‐dose combinations of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir 90/400 mg for hepatitis C virus and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 200/25/25 mg for HIV was evaluated in a randomized, open‐label, single‐center, multiple‐dose, 3‐way, 6‐sequence, crossover Phase 1 study in 42 healthy subjects. Emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF had no relevant effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of maximum concentration [C (max)] and area under the concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval [AUC (tau)] for ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and the metabolites GS‐566500 and GS‐331007. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had no effect on the C (max) and AUC (tau) for rilpivirine and emtricitabine. The C (max) and AUC (tau) of tenofovir, the major metabolite of TAF, were increased by 62% and 75%, respectively. However, the resulting absolute tenofovir exposures were markedly lower than the historical tenofovir exposures following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and, as such, were not considered to be clinically relevant. In contrast, additional adverse effect monitoring is recommended upon coadministration of ledipasvir and TDF due to elevated tenofovir exposures resulting from the DDI. This difference is explained by the fact that TAF 25 mg results in markedly lower (~90%) plasma tenofovir exposure compared to TDF 300 mg. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF were generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination. HIV/hepatitis C virus‐coinfected patients can coadminister ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF without dosage adjustments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5625157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56251572017-10-04 Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide Custodio, Joseph M. Chuck, Susan K. Chu, Hoa Cao, Huyen Ma, Grace Flaherty, John Ling, John Kearney, Brian P. Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles The drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential between the fixed‐dose combinations of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir 90/400 mg for hepatitis C virus and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 200/25/25 mg for HIV was evaluated in a randomized, open‐label, single‐center, multiple‐dose, 3‐way, 6‐sequence, crossover Phase 1 study in 42 healthy subjects. Emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF had no relevant effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of maximum concentration [C (max)] and area under the concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval [AUC (tau)] for ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and the metabolites GS‐566500 and GS‐331007. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had no effect on the C (max) and AUC (tau) for rilpivirine and emtricitabine. The C (max) and AUC (tau) of tenofovir, the major metabolite of TAF, were increased by 62% and 75%, respectively. However, the resulting absolute tenofovir exposures were markedly lower than the historical tenofovir exposures following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and, as such, were not considered to be clinically relevant. In contrast, additional adverse effect monitoring is recommended upon coadministration of ledipasvir and TDF due to elevated tenofovir exposures resulting from the DDI. This difference is explained by the fact that TAF 25 mg results in markedly lower (~90%) plasma tenofovir exposure compared to TDF 300 mg. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF were generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination. HIV/hepatitis C virus‐coinfected patients can coadminister ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF without dosage adjustments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5625157/ /pubmed/28971607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.353 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Custodio, Joseph M. Chuck, Susan K. Chu, Hoa Cao, Huyen Ma, Grace Flaherty, John Ling, John Kearney, Brian P. Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide |
title | Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide |
title_full | Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide |
title_fullStr | Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide |
title_full_unstemmed | Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide |
title_short | Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide |
title_sort | lack of clinically important pk interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.353 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT custodiojosephm lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide AT chucksusank lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide AT chuhoa lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide AT caohuyen lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide AT magrace lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide AT flahertyjohn lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide AT lingjohn lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide AT kearneybrianp lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide |