Cargando…

Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide

The drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential between the fixed‐dose combinations of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir 90/400 mg for hepatitis C virus and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 200/25/25 mg for HIV was evaluated in a randomized, open‐label, single‐center, multiple‐dose, 3‐way, 6‐sequ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Custodio, Joseph M., Chuck, Susan K., Chu, Hoa, Cao, Huyen, Ma, Grace, Flaherty, John, Ling, John, Kearney, Brian P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.353
_version_ 1783268347562950656
author Custodio, Joseph M.
Chuck, Susan K.
Chu, Hoa
Cao, Huyen
Ma, Grace
Flaherty, John
Ling, John
Kearney, Brian P.
author_facet Custodio, Joseph M.
Chuck, Susan K.
Chu, Hoa
Cao, Huyen
Ma, Grace
Flaherty, John
Ling, John
Kearney, Brian P.
author_sort Custodio, Joseph M.
collection PubMed
description The drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential between the fixed‐dose combinations of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir 90/400 mg for hepatitis C virus and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 200/25/25 mg for HIV was evaluated in a randomized, open‐label, single‐center, multiple‐dose, 3‐way, 6‐sequence, crossover Phase 1 study in 42 healthy subjects. Emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF had no relevant effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of maximum concentration [C (max)] and area under the concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval [AUC (tau)] for ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and the metabolites GS‐566500 and GS‐331007. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had no effect on the C (max) and AUC (tau) for rilpivirine and emtricitabine. The C (max) and AUC (tau) of tenofovir, the major metabolite of TAF, were increased by 62% and 75%, respectively. However, the resulting absolute tenofovir exposures were markedly lower than the historical tenofovir exposures following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and, as such, were not considered to be clinically relevant. In contrast, additional adverse effect monitoring is recommended upon coadministration of ledipasvir and TDF due to elevated tenofovir exposures resulting from the DDI. This difference is explained by the fact that TAF 25 mg results in markedly lower (~90%) plasma tenofovir exposure compared to TDF 300 mg. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF were generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination. HIV/hepatitis C virus‐coinfected patients can coadminister ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF without dosage adjustments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5625157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56251572017-10-04 Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide Custodio, Joseph M. Chuck, Susan K. Chu, Hoa Cao, Huyen Ma, Grace Flaherty, John Ling, John Kearney, Brian P. Pharmacol Res Perspect Original Articles The drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential between the fixed‐dose combinations of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir 90/400 mg for hepatitis C virus and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 200/25/25 mg for HIV was evaluated in a randomized, open‐label, single‐center, multiple‐dose, 3‐way, 6‐sequence, crossover Phase 1 study in 42 healthy subjects. Emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF had no relevant effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of maximum concentration [C (max)] and area under the concentration versus time curve over the dosing interval [AUC (tau)] for ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and the metabolites GS‐566500 and GS‐331007. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had no effect on the C (max) and AUC (tau) for rilpivirine and emtricitabine. The C (max) and AUC (tau) of tenofovir, the major metabolite of TAF, were increased by 62% and 75%, respectively. However, the resulting absolute tenofovir exposures were markedly lower than the historical tenofovir exposures following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and, as such, were not considered to be clinically relevant. In contrast, additional adverse effect monitoring is recommended upon coadministration of ledipasvir and TDF due to elevated tenofovir exposures resulting from the DDI. This difference is explained by the fact that TAF 25 mg results in markedly lower (~90%) plasma tenofovir exposure compared to TDF 300 mg. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF were generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination. HIV/hepatitis C virus‐coinfected patients can coadminister ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and emtricitabine/rilpivirine/TAF without dosage adjustments. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5625157/ /pubmed/28971607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.353 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Custodio, Joseph M.
Chuck, Susan K.
Chu, Hoa
Cao, Huyen
Ma, Grace
Flaherty, John
Ling, John
Kearney, Brian P.
Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide
title Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide
title_full Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide
title_fullStr Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide
title_full_unstemmed Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide
title_short Lack of clinically important PK interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide
title_sort lack of clinically important pk interaction between coformulated ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28971607
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.353
work_keys_str_mv AT custodiojosephm lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide
AT chucksusank lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide
AT chuhoa lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide
AT caohuyen lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide
AT magrace lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide
AT flahertyjohn lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide
AT lingjohn lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide
AT kearneybrianp lackofclinicallyimportantpkinteractionbetweencoformulatedledipasvirsofosbuvirandrilpivirineemtricitabinetenofoviralafenamide