Cargando…

Evaluation of Copan FecalSwab as Specimen Type for Use in Xpert C. difficile Assay

Liquid-based microbiology (LBM) devices incorporating flocked swabs and preservation medium ease transport of specimens and improve specimen yield compared to traditional fiber wound swabs; however, the performance of LBM collection devices has not been evaluated in many molecular assays. It is uncl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mashock, Michael J., Faron, Matthew L., Buchan, Blake W., Ledeboer, Nathan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28794179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00369-17
_version_ 1783268377095045120
author Mashock, Michael J.
Faron, Matthew L.
Buchan, Blake W.
Ledeboer, Nathan A.
author_facet Mashock, Michael J.
Faron, Matthew L.
Buchan, Blake W.
Ledeboer, Nathan A.
author_sort Mashock, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description Liquid-based microbiology (LBM) devices incorporating flocked swabs and preservation medium ease transport of specimens and improve specimen yield compared to traditional fiber wound swabs; however, the performance of LBM collection devices has not been evaluated in many molecular assays. It is unclear how the differences in matrix and specimen loading with an LBM device will affect test performance compared to traditional collection devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of specimens collected in FecalSwab transport medium (Copan Diagnostics, Murrieta, CA) compared to unpreserved stool using the Cepheid Xpert C. difficile assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). Results equivalent to unpreserved stool samples were obtained when 400 μl of FecalSwab-preserved stool was employed in the Xpert assay. The positive and negative percent agreement of specimens inoculated with FecalSwab medium (n = 281) was 97.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.9 to 96.4%) and 99.4% (95% CI, 96.4 to 99.9%), respectively, compared to reference results obtained using unpreserved stool. Throughout this study, only four discrepant results occurred when comparing preserved specimens to unpreserved stool specimens in the Xpert C. difficile PCR assay. Post discrepant analysis, using the BD MAX Cdiff assay, the specificity and sensitivity both increased to 100%. The high positive and negative percent agreements observed in this study suggest that stool preserved in FecalSwab media yields equivalent results to using unpreserved stool when tested on the Xpert C. difficile assay, allowing laboratories to adopt this liquid-based microbiology collection device.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5625397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56253972017-10-04 Evaluation of Copan FecalSwab as Specimen Type for Use in Xpert C. difficile Assay Mashock, Michael J. Faron, Matthew L. Buchan, Blake W. Ledeboer, Nathan A. J Clin Microbiol Bacteriology Liquid-based microbiology (LBM) devices incorporating flocked swabs and preservation medium ease transport of specimens and improve specimen yield compared to traditional fiber wound swabs; however, the performance of LBM collection devices has not been evaluated in many molecular assays. It is unclear how the differences in matrix and specimen loading with an LBM device will affect test performance compared to traditional collection devices. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of specimens collected in FecalSwab transport medium (Copan Diagnostics, Murrieta, CA) compared to unpreserved stool using the Cepheid Xpert C. difficile assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). Results equivalent to unpreserved stool samples were obtained when 400 μl of FecalSwab-preserved stool was employed in the Xpert assay. The positive and negative percent agreement of specimens inoculated with FecalSwab medium (n = 281) was 97.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.9 to 96.4%) and 99.4% (95% CI, 96.4 to 99.9%), respectively, compared to reference results obtained using unpreserved stool. Throughout this study, only four discrepant results occurred when comparing preserved specimens to unpreserved stool specimens in the Xpert C. difficile PCR assay. Post discrepant analysis, using the BD MAX Cdiff assay, the specificity and sensitivity both increased to 100%. The high positive and negative percent agreements observed in this study suggest that stool preserved in FecalSwab media yields equivalent results to using unpreserved stool when tested on the Xpert C. difficile assay, allowing laboratories to adopt this liquid-based microbiology collection device. American Society for Microbiology 2017-09-25 2017-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5625397/ /pubmed/28794179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00369-17 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mashock et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Bacteriology
Mashock, Michael J.
Faron, Matthew L.
Buchan, Blake W.
Ledeboer, Nathan A.
Evaluation of Copan FecalSwab as Specimen Type for Use in Xpert C. difficile Assay
title Evaluation of Copan FecalSwab as Specimen Type for Use in Xpert C. difficile Assay
title_full Evaluation of Copan FecalSwab as Specimen Type for Use in Xpert C. difficile Assay
title_fullStr Evaluation of Copan FecalSwab as Specimen Type for Use in Xpert C. difficile Assay
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Copan FecalSwab as Specimen Type for Use in Xpert C. difficile Assay
title_short Evaluation of Copan FecalSwab as Specimen Type for Use in Xpert C. difficile Assay
title_sort evaluation of copan fecalswab as specimen type for use in xpert c. difficile assay
topic Bacteriology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28794179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00369-17
work_keys_str_mv AT mashockmichaelj evaluationofcopanfecalswabasspecimentypeforuseinxpertcdifficileassay
AT faronmatthewl evaluationofcopanfecalswabasspecimentypeforuseinxpertcdifficileassay
AT buchanblakew evaluationofcopanfecalswabasspecimentypeforuseinxpertcdifficileassay
AT ledeboernathana evaluationofcopanfecalswabasspecimentypeforuseinxpertcdifficileassay