Cargando…

Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre

BACKGROUND: Positive surgical margins are a strong prognostic marker of disease outcome following radical prostatectomy, though prior evidence is largely from a PSA-screened population. We therefore aim to evaluate the biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins (PSM) after minimall...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sachdeva, Ashwin, Veeratterapillay, Rajan, Voysey, Antonia, Kelly, Katherine, Johnson, Mark I., Aning, Jonathan, Soomro, Naeem A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0262-y
_version_ 1783268410521550848
author Sachdeva, Ashwin
Veeratterapillay, Rajan
Voysey, Antonia
Kelly, Katherine
Johnson, Mark I.
Aning, Jonathan
Soomro, Naeem A.
author_facet Sachdeva, Ashwin
Veeratterapillay, Rajan
Voysey, Antonia
Kelly, Katherine
Johnson, Mark I.
Aning, Jonathan
Soomro, Naeem A.
author_sort Sachdeva, Ashwin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Positive surgical margins are a strong prognostic marker of disease outcome following radical prostatectomy, though prior evidence is largely from a PSA-screened population. We therefore aim to evaluate the biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins (PSM) after minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) in a UK tertiary centre. METHODS: Retrospective study of men undergoing laparoscopic or robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy between 2002 and 2014. Men with positive surgical margins (PSM) were identified and their biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate compared with men without PSM. The primary outcome measures were BCR rates and time to BCR. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios for biochemical recurrence rate (BCR), accounting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-two men were included for analysis. Pre-operative D’Amico risk stratification showed 37.5%, 53.3% and 9.3% of patients in the low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. On final pathological analysis, the proportion of patients with local staging pT2, pT3a and pT3b was 68.8%, 25.2% and 6.1% respectively. Overall positive margin rate was 30.6%. On multivariate analysis, the only pre-operative factor associated with PSM was age >65years. Patients with PSM were more likely to have higher tumour volume and more advanced pathological local stage. The BCR rate was 10.7% in margin-positive patients and 5.1% in margin-negative patients, at median 4.4-year follow-up. Upon multivariate analysis, high pre-operative PSA and high Gleason group were the only significant predictors of BCR (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to patients with negative surgical margins, those with PSM do not translate into worse medium-term oncological outcomes in the majority of cases amongst our cohort. We found that high pre-operative PSA and high Gleason group were the only significant predictors of BCR. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-017-0262-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5625596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56255962017-10-12 Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre Sachdeva, Ashwin Veeratterapillay, Rajan Voysey, Antonia Kelly, Katherine Johnson, Mark I. Aning, Jonathan Soomro, Naeem A. BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: Positive surgical margins are a strong prognostic marker of disease outcome following radical prostatectomy, though prior evidence is largely from a PSA-screened population. We therefore aim to evaluate the biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins (PSM) after minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) in a UK tertiary centre. METHODS: Retrospective study of men undergoing laparoscopic or robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy between 2002 and 2014. Men with positive surgical margins (PSM) were identified and their biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate compared with men without PSM. The primary outcome measures were BCR rates and time to BCR. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios for biochemical recurrence rate (BCR), accounting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Five hundred ninety-two men were included for analysis. Pre-operative D’Amico risk stratification showed 37.5%, 53.3% and 9.3% of patients in the low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. On final pathological analysis, the proportion of patients with local staging pT2, pT3a and pT3b was 68.8%, 25.2% and 6.1% respectively. Overall positive margin rate was 30.6%. On multivariate analysis, the only pre-operative factor associated with PSM was age >65years. Patients with PSM were more likely to have higher tumour volume and more advanced pathological local stage. The BCR rate was 10.7% in margin-positive patients and 5.1% in margin-negative patients, at median 4.4-year follow-up. Upon multivariate analysis, high pre-operative PSA and high Gleason group were the only significant predictors of BCR (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to patients with negative surgical margins, those with PSM do not translate into worse medium-term oncological outcomes in the majority of cases amongst our cohort. We found that high pre-operative PSA and high Gleason group were the only significant predictors of BCR. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12894-017-0262-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5625596/ /pubmed/28969608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0262-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sachdeva, Ashwin
Veeratterapillay, Rajan
Voysey, Antonia
Kelly, Katherine
Johnson, Mark I.
Aning, Jonathan
Soomro, Naeem A.
Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre
title Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre
title_full Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre
title_fullStr Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre
title_full_unstemmed Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre
title_short Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre
title_sort positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy – an analysis of outcomes from a uk tertiary referral centre
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0262-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sachdevaashwin positivesurgicalmarginsandbiochemicalrecurrencefollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomyananalysisofoutcomesfromauktertiaryreferralcentre
AT veeratterapillayrajan positivesurgicalmarginsandbiochemicalrecurrencefollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomyananalysisofoutcomesfromauktertiaryreferralcentre
AT voyseyantonia positivesurgicalmarginsandbiochemicalrecurrencefollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomyananalysisofoutcomesfromauktertiaryreferralcentre
AT kellykatherine positivesurgicalmarginsandbiochemicalrecurrencefollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomyananalysisofoutcomesfromauktertiaryreferralcentre
AT johnsonmarki positivesurgicalmarginsandbiochemicalrecurrencefollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomyananalysisofoutcomesfromauktertiaryreferralcentre
AT aningjonathan positivesurgicalmarginsandbiochemicalrecurrencefollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomyananalysisofoutcomesfromauktertiaryreferralcentre
AT soomronaeema positivesurgicalmarginsandbiochemicalrecurrencefollowingminimallyinvasiveradicalprostatectomyananalysisofoutcomesfromauktertiaryreferralcentre