Cargando…

Diagnostic value of CA19.9, circulating tumour DNA and circulating tumour cells in patients with solid pancreatic tumours

BACKGROUND: The direct comparison of CA19.9, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has never been performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumours (SPTs). METHODS: We included 68 patients with a S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sefrioui, David, Blanchard, France, Toure, Emmanuel, Basile, Paul, Beaussire, Ludivine, Dolfus, Claire, Perdrix, Anne, Paresy, Marianne, Antonietti, Michel, Iwanicki-Caron, Isabelle, Alhameedi, Raied, Lecleire, Stephane, Gangloff, Alice, Schwarz, Lilian, Clatot, Florian, Tuech, Jean-Jacques, Frébourg, Thierry, Jardin, Fabrice, Sabourin, Jean-Christophe, Sarafan-Vasseur, Nasrin, Michel, Pierre, Di Fiore, Frédéric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28772284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.250
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The direct comparison of CA19.9, circulating tumour cells (CTCs) and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has never been performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic tumours (SPTs). METHODS: We included 68 patients with a SPT referred for EUS-FNA. CTCs were analysed using size-based platform and ctDNA using digital PCR. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were evaluated for each marker and their combination. RESULTS: SPTs corresponded to 58 malignant tumours (52 pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) and 6 others) and 10 benign lesions. The sensitivity and specificity for PA diagnosis were 73% and 88% for EUS-FNA, 67% and 80% for CTC, 65% and 75% for ctDNA and 79% and 93% for CA19.9, respectively. The positivity of at least 2 markers was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 78% and 91%, respectively. CtDNA was the only marker associated with overall survival (median 5.2 months for ctDNA+ vs 11.0 months for ctDNA−, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CA19.9 alone and in combination with ctDNA and/or CTC analysis may represent an efficient method for diagnosing PA in patients with SPTs. Further studies including a larger cohort of patients with both malignant and benign lesions will be necessary to confirm these promising results.