Cargando…

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer

BACKGROUND: One-third of new early breast cancer diagnoses occur in women over 70 years old. However, older women are less likely to receive radical curative treatments. This study prospectively evaluated a cohort of older women using a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to determine whether f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okonji, D O, Sinha, R, Phillips, I, Fatz, D, Ring, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28797032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.257
_version_ 1783268426787061760
author Okonji, D O
Sinha, R
Phillips, I
Fatz, D
Ring, A
author_facet Okonji, D O
Sinha, R
Phillips, I
Fatz, D
Ring, A
author_sort Okonji, D O
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One-third of new early breast cancer diagnoses occur in women over 70 years old. However, older women are less likely to receive radical curative treatments. This study prospectively evaluated a cohort of older women using a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to determine whether fitness explained the apparent under-treatment in this patient group. METHODS: In this multi-centre prospective study, patients aged ⩾70 years with Stages I–III breast cancer underwent a pretreatment baseline CGA consisting of eight assessment tools. Patients were defined as ‘fit’ if they had normal score in seven out of eight of the assessment tools. ‘High risk’ patients were defined as those with grade 3, ER negative, HER2 positive, or node positive breast cancer. RESULTS: Data on 326 patients were available for full analysis. The median age was 77 years. In all, 182 (56%) of the total population were defined as high risk, with 49%, 61% and 53% of those in the 70–74, 75–84 and ⩾85 years age groups respectively having high risk tumours. A total of 301 patients had sufficient CGA records of whom 131 (44%) were reported as fit, with 34%, 54% and 12% of them in the 70–74, 75–84 and ⩾85 years age groups respectively. More fit than unfit patients underwent primary breast surgery (100% vs 91%, P=0.0002), axillary surgery (92% vs 84%, P=0.0340), and adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk disease (51% vs 20%, P=0.0001). Rates of adjuvant radiotherapy after wide local excision were not significantly different (88% vs 90% respectively, P=0.8195). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, all women ⩾70 years deemed fit by CGA underwent primary surgery. Nearly 50% of fit women with high-risk disease did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy suggesting under treatment in this group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5625670
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56256702018-09-26 Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer Okonji, D O Sinha, R Phillips, I Fatz, D Ring, A Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: One-third of new early breast cancer diagnoses occur in women over 70 years old. However, older women are less likely to receive radical curative treatments. This study prospectively evaluated a cohort of older women using a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) to determine whether fitness explained the apparent under-treatment in this patient group. METHODS: In this multi-centre prospective study, patients aged ⩾70 years with Stages I–III breast cancer underwent a pretreatment baseline CGA consisting of eight assessment tools. Patients were defined as ‘fit’ if they had normal score in seven out of eight of the assessment tools. ‘High risk’ patients were defined as those with grade 3, ER negative, HER2 positive, or node positive breast cancer. RESULTS: Data on 326 patients were available for full analysis. The median age was 77 years. In all, 182 (56%) of the total population were defined as high risk, with 49%, 61% and 53% of those in the 70–74, 75–84 and ⩾85 years age groups respectively having high risk tumours. A total of 301 patients had sufficient CGA records of whom 131 (44%) were reported as fit, with 34%, 54% and 12% of them in the 70–74, 75–84 and ⩾85 years age groups respectively. More fit than unfit patients underwent primary breast surgery (100% vs 91%, P=0.0002), axillary surgery (92% vs 84%, P=0.0340), and adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk disease (51% vs 20%, P=0.0001). Rates of adjuvant radiotherapy after wide local excision were not significantly different (88% vs 90% respectively, P=0.8195). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, all women ⩾70 years deemed fit by CGA underwent primary surgery. Nearly 50% of fit women with high-risk disease did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy suggesting under treatment in this group. Nature Publishing Group 2017-09-26 2017-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5625670/ /pubmed/28797032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.257 Text en Copyright © 2017 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Okonji, D O
Sinha, R
Phillips, I
Fatz, D
Ring, A
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer
title Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer
title_full Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer
title_fullStr Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer
title_short Comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer
title_sort comprehensive geriatric assessment in 326 older women with early breast cancer
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28797032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.257
work_keys_str_mv AT okonjido comprehensivegeriatricassessmentin326olderwomenwithearlybreastcancer
AT sinhar comprehensivegeriatricassessmentin326olderwomenwithearlybreastcancer
AT phillipsi comprehensivegeriatricassessmentin326olderwomenwithearlybreastcancer
AT fatzd comprehensivegeriatricassessmentin326olderwomenwithearlybreastcancer
AT ringa comprehensivegeriatricassessmentin326olderwomenwithearlybreastcancer