Cargando…

Evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress

BACKGROUND: Chronic work-related stress is quite prevalent in the working population and is in some cases accompanied by long-term sick leave. These stress complaints highly impact employees and are costly due to lost productivity and medical expenses. A new treatment platform with light therapy plu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen, Schoutens, Antonius M.C., Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W., Sluiter, Judith K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4720-y
_version_ 1783268435383287808
author Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
Schoutens, Antonius M.C.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W.
Sluiter, Judith K.
author_facet Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
Schoutens, Antonius M.C.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W.
Sluiter, Judith K.
author_sort Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic work-related stress is quite prevalent in the working population and is in some cases accompanied by long-term sick leave. These stress complaints highly impact employees and are costly due to lost productivity and medical expenses. A new treatment platform with light therapy plus Pulsed Electro Magnetic Fields (PEMF) in combination with coaching was used to assess whether more positive effects on return to work, stress, work-related fatigue, and quality of life could be induced compared to coaching alone. METHODS: A placebo-controlled trial was executed after inclusion of 96 workers, aged 18–65 with work-related chronic stress complaints and who were on sick leave (either part-time or full-time). Participants were divided into three arms at random. Group 1 (n = 28) received the treatment and coaching (Intervention group), group 2 (n = 28) received the treatment with the device turned off and coaching (Placebo group) and group 3 (n = 28) received coaching only (Control group). The data were collected at baseline, and after 6, 12 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome was % return to work, and secondary outcomes were work-related fatigue (emotional exhaustion and need for recovery after work), stress (distress and hair cortisol), and quality of life (SF-36 dimensions: vitality, emotional role limitation, and social functioning). RESULTS: Eighty-four workers completed all measurements, 28 in each group. All groups improved significantly over time in the level of return to work, as well as on all secondary outcomes. No statistical differences between the three groups were found either on the primary outcome or on any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Light therapy with Pulsed Electro Magnetic Fields PEMF therapy has no additional effect on return to work, stress, fatigue, and quality of live compared to coaching alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR4794, registration date: 18-sep-2014
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5625706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56257062017-10-12 Evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen Schoutens, Antonius M.C. Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W. Sluiter, Judith K. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic work-related stress is quite prevalent in the working population and is in some cases accompanied by long-term sick leave. These stress complaints highly impact employees and are costly due to lost productivity and medical expenses. A new treatment platform with light therapy plus Pulsed Electro Magnetic Fields (PEMF) in combination with coaching was used to assess whether more positive effects on return to work, stress, work-related fatigue, and quality of life could be induced compared to coaching alone. METHODS: A placebo-controlled trial was executed after inclusion of 96 workers, aged 18–65 with work-related chronic stress complaints and who were on sick leave (either part-time or full-time). Participants were divided into three arms at random. Group 1 (n = 28) received the treatment and coaching (Intervention group), group 2 (n = 28) received the treatment with the device turned off and coaching (Placebo group) and group 3 (n = 28) received coaching only (Control group). The data were collected at baseline, and after 6, 12 and 24 weeks. The primary outcome was % return to work, and secondary outcomes were work-related fatigue (emotional exhaustion and need for recovery after work), stress (distress and hair cortisol), and quality of life (SF-36 dimensions: vitality, emotional role limitation, and social functioning). RESULTS: Eighty-four workers completed all measurements, 28 in each group. All groups improved significantly over time in the level of return to work, as well as on all secondary outcomes. No statistical differences between the three groups were found either on the primary outcome or on any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Light therapy with Pulsed Electro Magnetic Fields PEMF therapy has no additional effect on return to work, stress, fatigue, and quality of live compared to coaching alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR4794, registration date: 18-sep-2014 BioMed Central 2017-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5625706/ /pubmed/28969697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4720-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen
Schoutens, Antonius M.C.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H.W.
Sluiter, Judith K.
Evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress
title Evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress
title_full Evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress
title_fullStr Evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress
title_short Evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress
title_sort evaluation of a randomized controlled trial on the effect on return to work with coaching combined with light therapy and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for workers with work-related chronic stress
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4720-y
work_keys_str_mv AT nieuwenhuijsenkaren evaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontheeffectonreturntoworkwithcoachingcombinedwithlighttherapyandpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyforworkerswithworkrelatedchronicstress
AT schoutensantoniusmc evaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontheeffectonreturntoworkwithcoachingcombinedwithlighttherapyandpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyforworkerswithworkrelatedchronicstress
AT fringsdresenmoniquehw evaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontheeffectonreturntoworkwithcoachingcombinedwithlighttherapyandpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyforworkerswithworkrelatedchronicstress
AT sluiterjudithk evaluationofarandomizedcontrolledtrialontheeffectonreturntoworkwithcoachingcombinedwithlighttherapyandpulsedelectromagneticfieldtherapyforworkerswithworkrelatedchronicstress