Cargando…
Perspective on the dynamics of cancer
BACKGROUND: The genetic diversity of cancer and the dynamic interactions between heterogeneous tumor cells, the stroma and immune cells present daunting challenges to the development of effective cancer therapies. Although cancer biology is more understood than ever, this has not translated into the...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12976-017-0066-5 |
_version_ | 1783268451367780352 |
---|---|
author | Derbal, Youcef |
author_facet | Derbal, Youcef |
author_sort | Derbal, Youcef |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The genetic diversity of cancer and the dynamic interactions between heterogeneous tumor cells, the stroma and immune cells present daunting challenges to the development of effective cancer therapies. Although cancer biology is more understood than ever, this has not translated into therapies that overcome drug resistance, cancer recurrence and metastasis. The future development of effective therapies will require more understanding of the dynamics of homeostatic dysregulation that drives cancer growth and progression. RESULTS: Cancer dynamics are explored using a model involving genes mediating the regulatory interactions between the signaling and metabolic pathways. The exploration is informed by a proposed genetic dysregulation measure of cellular processes. The analysis of the interaction dynamics between cancer cells, cancer associated fibroblasts, and tumor associate macrophages suggests that the mutual dependence of these cells promotes cancer growth and proliferation. In particular, MTOR and AMPK are hypothesized to be concurrently activated in cancer cells by amino acids recycled from the stroma. This leads to a proliferative growth supported by an upregulated glycolysis and a tricarboxylic acid cycle driven by glutamine sourced from the stroma. In other words, while genetic aberrations ignite carcinogenesis and lead to the dysregulation of key cellular processes, it is postulated that the dysregulation of metabolism locks cancer cells in a state of mutual dependence with the tumor microenvironment and deepens the tumor’s inflammation and immunosuppressive state which perpetuates as a result the growth and proliferation dynamics of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer therapies should aim for a progressive disruption of the dynamics of interactions between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment by targeting metabolic dysregulation and inflammation to partially restore tissue homeostasis and turn on the immune cancer kill switch. One potentially effective cancer therapeutic strategy is to induce the reduction of lactate and steer the tumor microenvironment to a state of reduced inflammation so as to enable an effective intervention of the immune system. The translation of this therapeutic approach into treatment regimens would however require more understanding of the adaptive complexity of cancer resulting from the interactions of cancer cells with the tumor microenvironment and the immune system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12976-017-0066-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5625776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56257762017-10-12 Perspective on the dynamics of cancer Derbal, Youcef Theor Biol Med Model Review BACKGROUND: The genetic diversity of cancer and the dynamic interactions between heterogeneous tumor cells, the stroma and immune cells present daunting challenges to the development of effective cancer therapies. Although cancer biology is more understood than ever, this has not translated into therapies that overcome drug resistance, cancer recurrence and metastasis. The future development of effective therapies will require more understanding of the dynamics of homeostatic dysregulation that drives cancer growth and progression. RESULTS: Cancer dynamics are explored using a model involving genes mediating the regulatory interactions between the signaling and metabolic pathways. The exploration is informed by a proposed genetic dysregulation measure of cellular processes. The analysis of the interaction dynamics between cancer cells, cancer associated fibroblasts, and tumor associate macrophages suggests that the mutual dependence of these cells promotes cancer growth and proliferation. In particular, MTOR and AMPK are hypothesized to be concurrently activated in cancer cells by amino acids recycled from the stroma. This leads to a proliferative growth supported by an upregulated glycolysis and a tricarboxylic acid cycle driven by glutamine sourced from the stroma. In other words, while genetic aberrations ignite carcinogenesis and lead to the dysregulation of key cellular processes, it is postulated that the dysregulation of metabolism locks cancer cells in a state of mutual dependence with the tumor microenvironment and deepens the tumor’s inflammation and immunosuppressive state which perpetuates as a result the growth and proliferation dynamics of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer therapies should aim for a progressive disruption of the dynamics of interactions between cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment by targeting metabolic dysregulation and inflammation to partially restore tissue homeostasis and turn on the immune cancer kill switch. One potentially effective cancer therapeutic strategy is to induce the reduction of lactate and steer the tumor microenvironment to a state of reduced inflammation so as to enable an effective intervention of the immune system. The translation of this therapeutic approach into treatment regimens would however require more understanding of the adaptive complexity of cancer resulting from the interactions of cancer cells with the tumor microenvironment and the immune system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12976-017-0066-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5625776/ /pubmed/28969664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12976-017-0066-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Derbal, Youcef Perspective on the dynamics of cancer |
title | Perspective on the dynamics of cancer |
title_full | Perspective on the dynamics of cancer |
title_fullStr | Perspective on the dynamics of cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Perspective on the dynamics of cancer |
title_short | Perspective on the dynamics of cancer |
title_sort | perspective on the dynamics of cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12976-017-0066-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derbalyoucef perspectiveonthedynamicsofcancer |