Cargando…

A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple fixed-combination bimatoprost 0.01%/brimonidine 0.15%/timolol 0.5% (TFC) versus dual fixed-combination brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% (DFC) in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. METHODS: Patients with intraocular pressure (IOP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartleben, Curt, Parra, Juan Camilo, Batoosingh, Amy, Bernstein, Paula, Goodkin, Margot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4586763
_version_ 1783268460018532352
author Hartleben, Curt
Parra, Juan Camilo
Batoosingh, Amy
Bernstein, Paula
Goodkin, Margot
author_facet Hartleben, Curt
Parra, Juan Camilo
Batoosingh, Amy
Bernstein, Paula
Goodkin, Margot
author_sort Hartleben, Curt
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple fixed-combination bimatoprost 0.01%/brimonidine 0.15%/timolol 0.5% (TFC) versus dual fixed-combination brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% (DFC) in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. METHODS: Patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥23 and ≤34 mmHg were randomized to twice-daily TFC or DFC. The primary variable is the change in worse eye mean IOP from baseline at week 12 (modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population). Secondary endpoints are mean IOP and mean change from baseline at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 (mITT population). TFC superiority was demonstrated if the primary variable favored TFC (p ≤ 0.05). Sensitivity analyses were conducted, and safety was assessed at all visits. RESULTS: TFC (n = 93) provided greater IOP reductions from baseline than DFC (n = 97) at week 12 (treatment difference, 0.85 mmHg; p = 0.028) and all other visits. TFC was also superior to DFC in patients with high baseline IOP (i.e., IOP ≥ 25 mmHg; p ≤ 0.011). Conjunctival hyperemia, ocular irritation, and dry eye were reported more often with TFC (p ≤ 0.016); however, discontinuations for ocular adverse events were similar between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: TFC demonstrated IOP-lowering benefits that outweigh the risk of predominantly mild ocular side effects, which may be particularly relevant in patients who require greater IOP lowering to prevent/delay disease progression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov registry number: NCT01241240.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5625812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56258122017-10-22 A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure Hartleben, Curt Parra, Juan Camilo Batoosingh, Amy Bernstein, Paula Goodkin, Margot J Ophthalmol Clinical Study OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple fixed-combination bimatoprost 0.01%/brimonidine 0.15%/timolol 0.5% (TFC) versus dual fixed-combination brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% (DFC) in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. METHODS: Patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥23 and ≤34 mmHg were randomized to twice-daily TFC or DFC. The primary variable is the change in worse eye mean IOP from baseline at week 12 (modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population). Secondary endpoints are mean IOP and mean change from baseline at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 (mITT population). TFC superiority was demonstrated if the primary variable favored TFC (p ≤ 0.05). Sensitivity analyses were conducted, and safety was assessed at all visits. RESULTS: TFC (n = 93) provided greater IOP reductions from baseline than DFC (n = 97) at week 12 (treatment difference, 0.85 mmHg; p = 0.028) and all other visits. TFC was also superior to DFC in patients with high baseline IOP (i.e., IOP ≥ 25 mmHg; p ≤ 0.011). Conjunctival hyperemia, ocular irritation, and dry eye were reported more often with TFC (p ≤ 0.016); however, discontinuations for ocular adverse events were similar between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: TFC demonstrated IOP-lowering benefits that outweigh the risk of predominantly mild ocular side effects, which may be particularly relevant in patients who require greater IOP lowering to prevent/delay disease progression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov registry number: NCT01241240. Hindawi 2017 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5625812/ /pubmed/29057117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4586763 Text en Copyright © 2017 Curt Hartleben et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Hartleben, Curt
Parra, Juan Camilo
Batoosingh, Amy
Bernstein, Paula
Goodkin, Margot
A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure
title A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure
title_full A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure
title_fullStr A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure
title_full_unstemmed A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure
title_short A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure
title_sort masked, randomized, phase 3 comparison of triple fixed-combination bimatoprost/brimonidine/timolol versus fixed-combination brimonidine/timolol for lowering intraocular pressure
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057117
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4586763
work_keys_str_mv AT hartlebencurt amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure
AT parrajuancamilo amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure
AT batoosinghamy amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure
AT bernsteinpaula amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure
AT goodkinmargot amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure
AT hartlebencurt maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure
AT parrajuancamilo maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure
AT batoosinghamy maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure
AT bernsteinpaula maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure
AT goodkinmargot maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure