Cargando…
A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple fixed-combination bimatoprost 0.01%/brimonidine 0.15%/timolol 0.5% (TFC) versus dual fixed-combination brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% (DFC) in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. METHODS: Patients with intraocular pressure (IOP...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4586763 |
_version_ | 1783268460018532352 |
---|---|
author | Hartleben, Curt Parra, Juan Camilo Batoosingh, Amy Bernstein, Paula Goodkin, Margot |
author_facet | Hartleben, Curt Parra, Juan Camilo Batoosingh, Amy Bernstein, Paula Goodkin, Margot |
author_sort | Hartleben, Curt |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple fixed-combination bimatoprost 0.01%/brimonidine 0.15%/timolol 0.5% (TFC) versus dual fixed-combination brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% (DFC) in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. METHODS: Patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥23 and ≤34 mmHg were randomized to twice-daily TFC or DFC. The primary variable is the change in worse eye mean IOP from baseline at week 12 (modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population). Secondary endpoints are mean IOP and mean change from baseline at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 (mITT population). TFC superiority was demonstrated if the primary variable favored TFC (p ≤ 0.05). Sensitivity analyses were conducted, and safety was assessed at all visits. RESULTS: TFC (n = 93) provided greater IOP reductions from baseline than DFC (n = 97) at week 12 (treatment difference, 0.85 mmHg; p = 0.028) and all other visits. TFC was also superior to DFC in patients with high baseline IOP (i.e., IOP ≥ 25 mmHg; p ≤ 0.011). Conjunctival hyperemia, ocular irritation, and dry eye were reported more often with TFC (p ≤ 0.016); however, discontinuations for ocular adverse events were similar between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: TFC demonstrated IOP-lowering benefits that outweigh the risk of predominantly mild ocular side effects, which may be particularly relevant in patients who require greater IOP lowering to prevent/delay disease progression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov registry number: NCT01241240. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5625812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56258122017-10-22 A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure Hartleben, Curt Parra, Juan Camilo Batoosingh, Amy Bernstein, Paula Goodkin, Margot J Ophthalmol Clinical Study OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of triple fixed-combination bimatoprost 0.01%/brimonidine 0.15%/timolol 0.5% (TFC) versus dual fixed-combination brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5% (DFC) in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. METHODS: Patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥23 and ≤34 mmHg were randomized to twice-daily TFC or DFC. The primary variable is the change in worse eye mean IOP from baseline at week 12 (modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population). Secondary endpoints are mean IOP and mean change from baseline at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 (mITT population). TFC superiority was demonstrated if the primary variable favored TFC (p ≤ 0.05). Sensitivity analyses were conducted, and safety was assessed at all visits. RESULTS: TFC (n = 93) provided greater IOP reductions from baseline than DFC (n = 97) at week 12 (treatment difference, 0.85 mmHg; p = 0.028) and all other visits. TFC was also superior to DFC in patients with high baseline IOP (i.e., IOP ≥ 25 mmHg; p ≤ 0.011). Conjunctival hyperemia, ocular irritation, and dry eye were reported more often with TFC (p ≤ 0.016); however, discontinuations for ocular adverse events were similar between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: TFC demonstrated IOP-lowering benefits that outweigh the risk of predominantly mild ocular side effects, which may be particularly relevant in patients who require greater IOP lowering to prevent/delay disease progression. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov registry number: NCT01241240. Hindawi 2017 2017-09-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5625812/ /pubmed/29057117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4586763 Text en Copyright © 2017 Curt Hartleben et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Hartleben, Curt Parra, Juan Camilo Batoosingh, Amy Bernstein, Paula Goodkin, Margot A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure |
title | A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure |
title_full | A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure |
title_fullStr | A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure |
title_full_unstemmed | A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure |
title_short | A Masked, Randomized, Phase 3 Comparison of Triple Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol versus Fixed-Combination Brimonidine/Timolol for Lowering Intraocular Pressure |
title_sort | masked, randomized, phase 3 comparison of triple fixed-combination bimatoprost/brimonidine/timolol versus fixed-combination brimonidine/timolol for lowering intraocular pressure |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4586763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hartlebencurt amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure AT parrajuancamilo amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure AT batoosinghamy amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure AT bernsteinpaula amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure AT goodkinmargot amaskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure AT hartlebencurt maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure AT parrajuancamilo maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure AT batoosinghamy maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure AT bernsteinpaula maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure AT goodkinmargot maskedrandomizedphase3comparisonoftriplefixedcombinationbimatoprostbrimonidinetimololversusfixedcombinationbrimonidinetimololforloweringintraocularpressure |