Cargando…
Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Behaviour change interventions that promote physical activity have major implications for health and well-being. Measuring intervention fidelity is crucial in determining the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended, therefore increasing scientific confidence about effect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6 |
_version_ | 1783268462832910336 |
---|---|
author | Lambert, Jeffrey D. Greaves, Colin J. Farrand, Paul Cross, Rosina Haase, Anne M. Taylor, Adrian H. |
author_facet | Lambert, Jeffrey D. Greaves, Colin J. Farrand, Paul Cross, Rosina Haase, Anne M. Taylor, Adrian H. |
author_sort | Lambert, Jeffrey D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Behaviour change interventions that promote physical activity have major implications for health and well-being. Measuring intervention fidelity is crucial in determining the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended, therefore increasing scientific confidence about effectiveness. However, we lack a clear overview of how well intervention fidelity is typically assessed in physical activity trials. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify peer - reviewed physical activity promotion trials that explicitly measured intervention fidelity. Methods used to assess intervention fidelity were categorised, narratively synthesised and critiqued using assessment criteria from NIH Behaviour Change Consortium (BCC) Treatment Fidelity Framework (design, training, delivery, receipt and enactment). RESULTS: Twenty eight articles reporting of twenty one studies used a wide variety of approaches to measure intervention fidelity. Delivery was the most common domain of intervention fidelity measured. Approaches used to measure fidelity across all domains varied from researcher coding of observational data (using checklists or scales) to participant self-report measures. There was considerable heterogeneity of methodological approaches to data collection with respect to instruments used, attention to psychometric properties, rater-selection, observational method and sampling strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In the field of physical activity interventions, fidelity measurement is highly heterogeneous both conceptually and methodologically. Clearer articulation of the core domains of intervention fidelity, along with appropriate measurement approaches for each domain are needed to improve the methodological quality of fidelity assessment in physical activity interventions. Recommendations are provided on how this situation can be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5625828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56258282017-10-12 Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review Lambert, Jeffrey D. Greaves, Colin J. Farrand, Paul Cross, Rosina Haase, Anne M. Taylor, Adrian H. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Behaviour change interventions that promote physical activity have major implications for health and well-being. Measuring intervention fidelity is crucial in determining the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended, therefore increasing scientific confidence about effectiveness. However, we lack a clear overview of how well intervention fidelity is typically assessed in physical activity trials. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify peer - reviewed physical activity promotion trials that explicitly measured intervention fidelity. Methods used to assess intervention fidelity were categorised, narratively synthesised and critiqued using assessment criteria from NIH Behaviour Change Consortium (BCC) Treatment Fidelity Framework (design, training, delivery, receipt and enactment). RESULTS: Twenty eight articles reporting of twenty one studies used a wide variety of approaches to measure intervention fidelity. Delivery was the most common domain of intervention fidelity measured. Approaches used to measure fidelity across all domains varied from researcher coding of observational data (using checklists or scales) to participant self-report measures. There was considerable heterogeneity of methodological approaches to data collection with respect to instruments used, attention to psychometric properties, rater-selection, observational method and sampling strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In the field of physical activity interventions, fidelity measurement is highly heterogeneous both conceptually and methodologically. Clearer articulation of the core domains of intervention fidelity, along with appropriate measurement approaches for each domain are needed to improve the methodological quality of fidelity assessment in physical activity interventions. Recommendations are provided on how this situation can be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5625828/ /pubmed/28969669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lambert, Jeffrey D. Greaves, Colin J. Farrand, Paul Cross, Rosina Haase, Anne M. Taylor, Adrian H. Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review |
title | Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review |
title_full | Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review |
title_short | Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review |
title_sort | assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lambertjeffreyd assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview AT greavescolinj assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview AT farrandpaul assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview AT crossrosina assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview AT haaseannem assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview AT tayloradrianh assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview |