Cargando…

Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Behaviour change interventions that promote physical activity have major implications for health and well-being. Measuring intervention fidelity is crucial in determining the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended, therefore increasing scientific confidence about effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambert, Jeffrey D., Greaves, Colin J., Farrand, Paul, Cross, Rosina, Haase, Anne M., Taylor, Adrian H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6
_version_ 1783268462832910336
author Lambert, Jeffrey D.
Greaves, Colin J.
Farrand, Paul
Cross, Rosina
Haase, Anne M.
Taylor, Adrian H.
author_facet Lambert, Jeffrey D.
Greaves, Colin J.
Farrand, Paul
Cross, Rosina
Haase, Anne M.
Taylor, Adrian H.
author_sort Lambert, Jeffrey D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Behaviour change interventions that promote physical activity have major implications for health and well-being. Measuring intervention fidelity is crucial in determining the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended, therefore increasing scientific confidence about effectiveness. However, we lack a clear overview of how well intervention fidelity is typically assessed in physical activity trials. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify peer - reviewed physical activity promotion trials that explicitly measured intervention fidelity. Methods used to assess intervention fidelity were categorised, narratively synthesised and critiqued using assessment criteria from NIH Behaviour Change Consortium (BCC) Treatment Fidelity Framework (design, training, delivery, receipt and enactment). RESULTS: Twenty eight articles reporting of twenty one studies used a wide variety of approaches to measure intervention fidelity. Delivery was the most common domain of intervention fidelity measured. Approaches used to measure fidelity across all domains varied from researcher coding of observational data (using checklists or scales) to participant self-report measures. There was considerable heterogeneity of methodological approaches to data collection with respect to instruments used, attention to psychometric properties, rater-selection, observational method and sampling strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In the field of physical activity interventions, fidelity measurement is highly heterogeneous both conceptually and methodologically. Clearer articulation of the core domains of intervention fidelity, along with appropriate measurement approaches for each domain are needed to improve the methodological quality of fidelity assessment in physical activity interventions. Recommendations are provided on how this situation can be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5625828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56258282017-10-12 Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review Lambert, Jeffrey D. Greaves, Colin J. Farrand, Paul Cross, Rosina Haase, Anne M. Taylor, Adrian H. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Behaviour change interventions that promote physical activity have major implications for health and well-being. Measuring intervention fidelity is crucial in determining the extent to which an intervention is delivered as intended, therefore increasing scientific confidence about effectiveness. However, we lack a clear overview of how well intervention fidelity is typically assessed in physical activity trials. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify peer - reviewed physical activity promotion trials that explicitly measured intervention fidelity. Methods used to assess intervention fidelity were categorised, narratively synthesised and critiqued using assessment criteria from NIH Behaviour Change Consortium (BCC) Treatment Fidelity Framework (design, training, delivery, receipt and enactment). RESULTS: Twenty eight articles reporting of twenty one studies used a wide variety of approaches to measure intervention fidelity. Delivery was the most common domain of intervention fidelity measured. Approaches used to measure fidelity across all domains varied from researcher coding of observational data (using checklists or scales) to participant self-report measures. There was considerable heterogeneity of methodological approaches to data collection with respect to instruments used, attention to psychometric properties, rater-selection, observational method and sampling strategies. CONCLUSIONS: In the field of physical activity interventions, fidelity measurement is highly heterogeneous both conceptually and methodologically. Clearer articulation of the core domains of intervention fidelity, along with appropriate measurement approaches for each domain are needed to improve the methodological quality of fidelity assessment in physical activity interventions. Recommendations are provided on how this situation can be improved. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5625828/ /pubmed/28969669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lambert, Jeffrey D.
Greaves, Colin J.
Farrand, Paul
Cross, Rosina
Haase, Anne M.
Taylor, Adrian H.
Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review
title Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review
title_full Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review
title_fullStr Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review
title_short Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review
title_sort assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5625828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28969669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4778-6
work_keys_str_mv AT lambertjeffreyd assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview
AT greavescolinj assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview
AT farrandpaul assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview
AT crossrosina assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview
AT haaseannem assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview
AT tayloradrianh assessmentoffidelityinindividuallevelbehaviourchangeinterventionspromotingphysicalactivityamongadultsasystematicreview