Cargando…
Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common cancer with high mortality because of its rapid progression and poor prognosis. Radiotherapy is one of the most effective treatments for EC. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are 2 recently dev...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28767597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007685 |
_version_ | 1783268501612396544 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Dandan Li, Guowen Li, Hongfei Jia, Fei |
author_facet | Xu, Dandan Li, Guowen Li, Hongfei Jia, Fei |
author_sort | Xu, Dandan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common cancer with high mortality because of its rapid progression and poor prognosis. Radiotherapy is one of the most effective treatments for EC. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are 2 recently developed radiotherapy techniques. IMRT is believed to be more effective than 3D-CRT in target coverage, dose homogeneity, and reducing toxicity to normal organs. However, these advantages have not been demonstrated in the treatment of EC. This meta-analysis was performed to compare IMRT and 3D-CRT in the treatment of EC in terms of dose–volume histograms and outcomes including survival and toxicity. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases from their inceptions to Dec 30, 2016. Two authors independently assessed the included studies and extracted data. The average percent irradiated volumes of adjacent noncancerous organs were calculated and compared between IMRT and 3D-CRT. The odds ratio of overall survival (OS), and radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis was also evaluated. RESULTS: Totally 7 studies were included. Of them, 5 studies (80 patients) were included in the dosimetric comparison, 3 studies (871 patients) were included in the OS analysis, and 2 studies (205 patients) were included in the irradiation toxicity analysis. For lung in patients receiving doses ≥20 Gy and heart in patients receiving dose = 50 Gy, the average irradiated volumes of IMRT were less than those from 3D-CRT. IMRT resulted in a higher OS than 3D-CRT. However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis between 2 radiotherapy techniques. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that IMRT-delivered high radiation dose produces significantly less average percent volumes of irradiated lung and heart than 3D-CRT. IMRT is superior to 3D-CRT in the OS of EC while shows no benefit on radiation toxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5626151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56261512017-10-11 Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Xu, Dandan Li, Guowen Li, Hongfei Jia, Fei Medicine (Baltimore) 6800 BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a common cancer with high mortality because of its rapid progression and poor prognosis. Radiotherapy is one of the most effective treatments for EC. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are 2 recently developed radiotherapy techniques. IMRT is believed to be more effective than 3D-CRT in target coverage, dose homogeneity, and reducing toxicity to normal organs. However, these advantages have not been demonstrated in the treatment of EC. This meta-analysis was performed to compare IMRT and 3D-CRT in the treatment of EC in terms of dose–volume histograms and outcomes including survival and toxicity. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library databases from their inceptions to Dec 30, 2016. Two authors independently assessed the included studies and extracted data. The average percent irradiated volumes of adjacent noncancerous organs were calculated and compared between IMRT and 3D-CRT. The odds ratio of overall survival (OS), and radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis was also evaluated. RESULTS: Totally 7 studies were included. Of them, 5 studies (80 patients) were included in the dosimetric comparison, 3 studies (871 patients) were included in the OS analysis, and 2 studies (205 patients) were included in the irradiation toxicity analysis. For lung in patients receiving doses ≥20 Gy and heart in patients receiving dose = 50 Gy, the average irradiated volumes of IMRT were less than those from 3D-CRT. IMRT resulted in a higher OS than 3D-CRT. However, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis between 2 radiotherapy techniques. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that IMRT-delivered high radiation dose produces significantly less average percent volumes of irradiated lung and heart than 3D-CRT. IMRT is superior to 3D-CRT in the OS of EC while shows no benefit on radiation toxicity. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5626151/ /pubmed/28767597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007685 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 6800 Xu, Dandan Li, Guowen Li, Hongfei Jia, Fei Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison of imrt versus 3d-crt in the treatment of esophagus cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 6800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28767597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007685 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xudandan comparisonofimrtversus3dcrtinthetreatmentofesophaguscancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liguowen comparisonofimrtversus3dcrtinthetreatmentofesophaguscancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lihongfei comparisonofimrtversus3dcrtinthetreatmentofesophaguscancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiafei comparisonofimrtversus3dcrtinthetreatmentofesophaguscancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |