Cargando…

Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) in migraine treatment. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with at least 2 migration attacks each month were recruited and randomly divided into a verum PENS group and a sham PENS group in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hong, Xu, Qiao-rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28953632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008108
_version_ 1783268517999542272
author Li, Hong
Xu, Qiao-rong
author_facet Li, Hong
Xu, Qiao-rong
author_sort Li, Hong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) in migraine treatment. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with at least 2 migration attacks each month were recruited and randomly divided into a verum PENS group and a sham PENS group in a ratio of 1:1. All patients received verum or sham PENS 30 minutes daily, 5 times weekly for 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were change in monthly migraine days (MMD) and the 50% responder rate (RR). Secondary outcomes were evaluated using the monthly migraine attacks (MMA), monthly headache days (MHD), and monthly acute antimigraine drug intake (MAADI). All outcome measurements were performed at treatment initiation to establish a baseline and again after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: At the end of the 12 weeks, the group receiving verum PENS exhibited statistically significant decrease in the mean MMD compared with the group receiving sham PENS intervention (P < .05). Additionally, the 50% RR was significantly higher in the verum PENS group than that in the sham PENS group (P < .05). Furthermore, the MMA, MHD, and MAADI were also significantly lower in the verum PENS group that those in the sham PENS group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated that verum PENS is more effective and safe than Sham PENS for the treatment of migraine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5626275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56262752017-10-11 Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine Li, Hong Xu, Qiao-rong Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) in migraine treatment. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with at least 2 migration attacks each month were recruited and randomly divided into a verum PENS group and a sham PENS group in a ratio of 1:1. All patients received verum or sham PENS 30 minutes daily, 5 times weekly for 12 weeks. The primary outcomes were change in monthly migraine days (MMD) and the 50% responder rate (RR). Secondary outcomes were evaluated using the monthly migraine attacks (MMA), monthly headache days (MHD), and monthly acute antimigraine drug intake (MAADI). All outcome measurements were performed at treatment initiation to establish a baseline and again after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: At the end of the 12 weeks, the group receiving verum PENS exhibited statistically significant decrease in the mean MMD compared with the group receiving sham PENS intervention (P < .05). Additionally, the 50% RR was significantly higher in the verum PENS group than that in the sham PENS group (P < .05). Furthermore, the MMA, MHD, and MAADI were also significantly lower in the verum PENS group that those in the sham PENS group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrated that verum PENS is more effective and safe than Sham PENS for the treatment of migraine. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5626275/ /pubmed/28953632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008108 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Li, Hong
Xu, Qiao-rong
Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine
title Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine
title_full Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine
title_fullStr Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine
title_full_unstemmed Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine
title_short Effect of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine
title_sort effect of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of migraine
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28953632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008108
work_keys_str_mv AT lihong effectofpercutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthetreatmentofmigraine
AT xuqiaorong effectofpercutaneouselectricalnervestimulationforthetreatmentofmigraine