Cargando…
Comparison of perceptual eye positions among patients with different degrees of anisometropia
The aim of this study is to compare the perceptual eye positions (PEPs) among patients with different degrees of anisometropia. A total of 157 patients were recruited into this retrospective study. A detailed ophthalmic examination was conducted on each patient. The degree of refractive errors in th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28953639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008119 |
_version_ | 1783268519623786496 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Cheng Li, Xue Zhang, Guanrong Lan, Jianqing Zhang, Yan Chu, Hang Li, Juan Xie, Wenjuan Wang, Shujun Yan, Li Zeng, Jin |
author_facet | Yang, Cheng Li, Xue Zhang, Guanrong Lan, Jianqing Zhang, Yan Chu, Hang Li, Juan Xie, Wenjuan Wang, Shujun Yan, Li Zeng, Jin |
author_sort | Yang, Cheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study is to compare the perceptual eye positions (PEPs) among patients with different degrees of anisometropia. A total of 157 patients were recruited into this retrospective study. A detailed ophthalmic examination was conducted on each patient. The degree of refractive errors in the presence of astigmatism was converted into the degree of spherical equivalent (SE). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the interocular SE difference: severe anisometropia group with interocular SE difference ≥2.50D, mild anisometropia group with interocular SE difference ≥1.00D and <2.50D, and non-anisometropia group with interocular SE difference <1.00D. The vertical and horizontal PEP were measured by a computer-controlled perceptual examination evaluation system. The results obtained from the 3 groups were compared and analyzed. A total of 157 patients were enrolled including 32 patients in the severe anisometropia group, 37 patients in the mild anisometropia group, and 88 patients in the non-anisometropia group. The quartiles of vertical PEP pixels were as follows: 7.50 (5.00, 16.75) in the severe anisometropia group, 5.00 (2.00, 7.50) in the mild anisometropia group, and 5.00 (3.00, 9.00) in the non-anisometropia group, respectively. The vertical PEP pixel was much higher in the severe anisometropia group than that in the other two groups (P < .05). The quartiles of horizontal PEP pixels were as follows: 27.50 (10.75, 67.50) in the severe anisometropia group, 17.00 (7.00, 54.50) in the mild anisometropia group, and 21.50 (11.00, 60.75) in the non-anisometropia group. There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (P > .05). There was an obvious deviation of vertical PEP in patients with anisometropia ≥2.50D, indicating that the instability of vertical PEP might be associated with the development of severe anisometropia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5626282 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56262822017-10-11 Comparison of perceptual eye positions among patients with different degrees of anisometropia Yang, Cheng Li, Xue Zhang, Guanrong Lan, Jianqing Zhang, Yan Chu, Hang Li, Juan Xie, Wenjuan Wang, Shujun Yan, Li Zeng, Jin Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 The aim of this study is to compare the perceptual eye positions (PEPs) among patients with different degrees of anisometropia. A total of 157 patients were recruited into this retrospective study. A detailed ophthalmic examination was conducted on each patient. The degree of refractive errors in the presence of astigmatism was converted into the degree of spherical equivalent (SE). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the interocular SE difference: severe anisometropia group with interocular SE difference ≥2.50D, mild anisometropia group with interocular SE difference ≥1.00D and <2.50D, and non-anisometropia group with interocular SE difference <1.00D. The vertical and horizontal PEP were measured by a computer-controlled perceptual examination evaluation system. The results obtained from the 3 groups were compared and analyzed. A total of 157 patients were enrolled including 32 patients in the severe anisometropia group, 37 patients in the mild anisometropia group, and 88 patients in the non-anisometropia group. The quartiles of vertical PEP pixels were as follows: 7.50 (5.00, 16.75) in the severe anisometropia group, 5.00 (2.00, 7.50) in the mild anisometropia group, and 5.00 (3.00, 9.00) in the non-anisometropia group, respectively. The vertical PEP pixel was much higher in the severe anisometropia group than that in the other two groups (P < .05). The quartiles of horizontal PEP pixels were as follows: 27.50 (10.75, 67.50) in the severe anisometropia group, 17.00 (7.00, 54.50) in the mild anisometropia group, and 21.50 (11.00, 60.75) in the non-anisometropia group. There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups (P > .05). There was an obvious deviation of vertical PEP in patients with anisometropia ≥2.50D, indicating that the instability of vertical PEP might be associated with the development of severe anisometropia. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5626282/ /pubmed/28953639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008119 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5800 Yang, Cheng Li, Xue Zhang, Guanrong Lan, Jianqing Zhang, Yan Chu, Hang Li, Juan Xie, Wenjuan Wang, Shujun Yan, Li Zeng, Jin Comparison of perceptual eye positions among patients with different degrees of anisometropia |
title | Comparison of perceptual eye positions among patients with different degrees of anisometropia |
title_full | Comparison of perceptual eye positions among patients with different degrees of anisometropia |
title_fullStr | Comparison of perceptual eye positions among patients with different degrees of anisometropia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of perceptual eye positions among patients with different degrees of anisometropia |
title_short | Comparison of perceptual eye positions among patients with different degrees of anisometropia |
title_sort | comparison of perceptual eye positions among patients with different degrees of anisometropia |
topic | 5800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626282/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28953639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangcheng comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT lixue comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT zhangguanrong comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT lanjianqing comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT zhangyan comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT chuhang comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT lijuan comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT xiewenjuan comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT wangshujun comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT yanli comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia AT zengjin comparisonofperceptualeyepositionsamongpatientswithdifferentdegreesofanisometropia |