Cargando…

Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Huangqi injection (HI) in treating chronic heart failure (CHF) systematically. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for retrieving randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CHF treated by HI in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Kaihuan, Wu, Jiarui, Duan, Xiaojiao, Wu, Jiatao, Zhang, Dan, Zhang, Xiaomeng, Zhang, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28953668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008167
_version_ 1783268526478327808
author Wang, Kaihuan
Wu, Jiarui
Duan, Xiaojiao
Wu, Jiatao
Zhang, Dan
Zhang, Xiaomeng
Zhang, Bing
author_facet Wang, Kaihuan
Wu, Jiarui
Duan, Xiaojiao
Wu, Jiatao
Zhang, Dan
Zhang, Xiaomeng
Zhang, Bing
author_sort Wang, Kaihuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Huangqi injection (HI) in treating chronic heart failure (CHF) systematically. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for retrieving randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CHF treated by HI in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Database up to June, 6, 2017, and then the included RCTs were assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The clinical total effective rate, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and others outcomes were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 in random-effect model, the funnel plot were depicted as well. Meanwhile, the sensitivity analysis was carried out by STATA 12.0. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs involved 1864 patients were included. The result of HI group was more efficient in the clinical total effective rate (RR = 1.19, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) [1.14–1.26], P < .00001). In addition, HI plus western medicine (WM) could improve LVEF (MD = 4.64, 95% CI [3.52–5.75], P < .00001), and others cardiac indexes. Meanwhile, a combination of HI and WM also can perfect 6 minutes walk test (6MWT). Three RCTs reported no serious adverse drug events/adverse drug reactions occurred. CONCLUSION: Compared with WM, a combination of HI and WM was more efficacious in improving the clinical total effective rate, and perfect patients’ condition, but more evidence-based medicine researches needed to support this study further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5626311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56263112017-10-11 Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Kaihuan Wu, Jiarui Duan, Xiaojiao Wu, Jiatao Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Bing Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Huangqi injection (HI) in treating chronic heart failure (CHF) systematically. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for retrieving randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CHF treated by HI in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Database up to June, 6, 2017, and then the included RCTs were assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The clinical total effective rate, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and others outcomes were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 in random-effect model, the funnel plot were depicted as well. Meanwhile, the sensitivity analysis was carried out by STATA 12.0. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs involved 1864 patients were included. The result of HI group was more efficient in the clinical total effective rate (RR = 1.19, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) [1.14–1.26], P < .00001). In addition, HI plus western medicine (WM) could improve LVEF (MD = 4.64, 95% CI [3.52–5.75], P < .00001), and others cardiac indexes. Meanwhile, a combination of HI and WM also can perfect 6 minutes walk test (6MWT). Three RCTs reported no serious adverse drug events/adverse drug reactions occurred. CONCLUSION: Compared with WM, a combination of HI and WM was more efficacious in improving the clinical total effective rate, and perfect patients’ condition, but more evidence-based medicine researches needed to support this study further. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5626311/ /pubmed/28953668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008167 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3800
Wang, Kaihuan
Wu, Jiarui
Duan, Xiaojiao
Wu, Jiatao
Zhang, Dan
Zhang, Xiaomeng
Zhang, Bing
Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 3800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28953668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008167
work_keys_str_mv AT wangkaihuan huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wujiarui huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT duanxiaojiao huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wujiatao huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangdan huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxiaomeng huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangbing huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis