Cargando…
Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Huangqi injection (HI) in treating chronic heart failure (CHF) systematically. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for retrieving randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CHF treated by HI in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28953668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008167 |
_version_ | 1783268526478327808 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Kaihuan Wu, Jiarui Duan, Xiaojiao Wu, Jiatao Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Bing |
author_facet | Wang, Kaihuan Wu, Jiarui Duan, Xiaojiao Wu, Jiatao Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Bing |
author_sort | Wang, Kaihuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Huangqi injection (HI) in treating chronic heart failure (CHF) systematically. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for retrieving randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CHF treated by HI in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Database up to June, 6, 2017, and then the included RCTs were assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The clinical total effective rate, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and others outcomes were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 in random-effect model, the funnel plot were depicted as well. Meanwhile, the sensitivity analysis was carried out by STATA 12.0. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs involved 1864 patients were included. The result of HI group was more efficient in the clinical total effective rate (RR = 1.19, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) [1.14–1.26], P < .00001). In addition, HI plus western medicine (WM) could improve LVEF (MD = 4.64, 95% CI [3.52–5.75], P < .00001), and others cardiac indexes. Meanwhile, a combination of HI and WM also can perfect 6 minutes walk test (6MWT). Three RCTs reported no serious adverse drug events/adverse drug reactions occurred. CONCLUSION: Compared with WM, a combination of HI and WM was more efficacious in improving the clinical total effective rate, and perfect patients’ condition, but more evidence-based medicine researches needed to support this study further. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5626311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56263112017-10-11 Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Kaihuan Wu, Jiarui Duan, Xiaojiao Wu, Jiatao Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Bing Medicine (Baltimore) 3800 BACKGROUND: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of Huangqi injection (HI) in treating chronic heart failure (CHF) systematically. METHODS: A literature search was conducted for retrieving randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CHF treated by HI in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, China Biology Medicine disc, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Database up to June, 6, 2017, and then the included RCTs were assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. The clinical total effective rate, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and others outcomes were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 in random-effect model, the funnel plot were depicted as well. Meanwhile, the sensitivity analysis was carried out by STATA 12.0. RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs involved 1864 patients were included. The result of HI group was more efficient in the clinical total effective rate (RR = 1.19, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) [1.14–1.26], P < .00001). In addition, HI plus western medicine (WM) could improve LVEF (MD = 4.64, 95% CI [3.52–5.75], P < .00001), and others cardiac indexes. Meanwhile, a combination of HI and WM also can perfect 6 minutes walk test (6MWT). Three RCTs reported no serious adverse drug events/adverse drug reactions occurred. CONCLUSION: Compared with WM, a combination of HI and WM was more efficacious in improving the clinical total effective rate, and perfect patients’ condition, but more evidence-based medicine researches needed to support this study further. Wolters Kluwer Health 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5626311/ /pubmed/28953668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008167 Text en Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3800 Wang, Kaihuan Wu, Jiarui Duan, Xiaojiao Wu, Jiatao Zhang, Dan Zhang, Xiaomeng Zhang, Bing Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | huangqi injection in the treatment of chronic heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 3800 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28953668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangkaihuan huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wujiarui huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT duanxiaojiao huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wujiatao huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangdan huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangxiaomeng huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangbing huangqiinjectioninthetreatmentofchronicheartfailureasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |