Cargando…

Proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: is a single collar size sufficient?

BACKGROUND: Even if the benefits of collars are unclear, they remain widely used, in several femoral stem designs. This study aimed to determine whether collar size should be proportional to hip dimensions and morphology. The hypothesis was that the collar should be larger for greater stem sizes and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonin, Nicolas, Gedouin, Jean-Emmanuel, Pibarot, Vincent, Bejui-Hughues, Jacques, Bothorel, Hugo, Saffarini, Mo, Batailler, Cécile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28975538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-017-0107-3
_version_ 1783268575147982848
author Bonin, Nicolas
Gedouin, Jean-Emmanuel
Pibarot, Vincent
Bejui-Hughues, Jacques
Bothorel, Hugo
Saffarini, Mo
Batailler, Cécile
author_facet Bonin, Nicolas
Gedouin, Jean-Emmanuel
Pibarot, Vincent
Bejui-Hughues, Jacques
Bothorel, Hugo
Saffarini, Mo
Batailler, Cécile
author_sort Bonin, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Even if the benefits of collars are unclear, they remain widely used, in several femoral stem designs. This study aimed to determine whether collar size should be proportional to hip dimensions and morphology. The hypothesis was that the collar should be larger for greater stem sizes and for varus femoral necks. METHODS: Computed Tomography scans of 204 healthy hips were digitally analysed and manually templated to determine principle dimensions, appropriate stem size and model, as well as cortical distance at the femoral calcar (ideal collar size). RESULTS: Univariable analysis revealed that cortical distance was moderately correlated with mediolateral offset (r = 0.572; p < 0.0001) and stem model (r = 0.520; p < 0.0001). Cortical distance was weakly correlated with head diameter (r = 0.399; p < 0.0001), stem size (r = 0.200; p = 0.017), and patient gender (r = 0.361; p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that stem model (p < 0.0001) and head diameter (p = 0.0162) are directly correlated to cortical distance. CONCLUSION: We found that cortical distance along the femoral calcar is directly correlated with the model of the stem implanted (‘standard’ or ‘varus’) and with the head diameter. This cortical distance indicates optimal collar size, which would grant maximum calcar coverage without prosthetic overhang. Collar size should be proportional to the size of the operated hip, and should be larger for ‘varus’ stem models than for ‘standard’ stem models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5626675
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56266752017-10-17 Proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: is a single collar size sufficient? Bonin, Nicolas Gedouin, Jean-Emmanuel Pibarot, Vincent Bejui-Hughues, Jacques Bothorel, Hugo Saffarini, Mo Batailler, Cécile J Exp Orthop Research BACKGROUND: Even if the benefits of collars are unclear, they remain widely used, in several femoral stem designs. This study aimed to determine whether collar size should be proportional to hip dimensions and morphology. The hypothesis was that the collar should be larger for greater stem sizes and for varus femoral necks. METHODS: Computed Tomography scans of 204 healthy hips were digitally analysed and manually templated to determine principle dimensions, appropriate stem size and model, as well as cortical distance at the femoral calcar (ideal collar size). RESULTS: Univariable analysis revealed that cortical distance was moderately correlated with mediolateral offset (r = 0.572; p < 0.0001) and stem model (r = 0.520; p < 0.0001). Cortical distance was weakly correlated with head diameter (r = 0.399; p < 0.0001), stem size (r = 0.200; p = 0.017), and patient gender (r = 0.361; p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that stem model (p < 0.0001) and head diameter (p = 0.0162) are directly correlated to cortical distance. CONCLUSION: We found that cortical distance along the femoral calcar is directly correlated with the model of the stem implanted (‘standard’ or ‘varus’) and with the head diameter. This cortical distance indicates optimal collar size, which would grant maximum calcar coverage without prosthetic overhang. Collar size should be proportional to the size of the operated hip, and should be larger for ‘varus’ stem models than for ‘standard’ stem models. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-10-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5626675/ /pubmed/28975538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-017-0107-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Bonin, Nicolas
Gedouin, Jean-Emmanuel
Pibarot, Vincent
Bejui-Hughues, Jacques
Bothorel, Hugo
Saffarini, Mo
Batailler, Cécile
Proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: is a single collar size sufficient?
title Proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: is a single collar size sufficient?
title_full Proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: is a single collar size sufficient?
title_fullStr Proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: is a single collar size sufficient?
title_full_unstemmed Proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: is a single collar size sufficient?
title_short Proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: is a single collar size sufficient?
title_sort proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: is a single collar size sufficient?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28975538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-017-0107-3
work_keys_str_mv AT boninnicolas proximalfemoralanatomyandcollaredstemsinhiparthroplastyisasinglecollarsizesufficient
AT gedouinjeanemmanuel proximalfemoralanatomyandcollaredstemsinhiparthroplastyisasinglecollarsizesufficient
AT pibarotvincent proximalfemoralanatomyandcollaredstemsinhiparthroplastyisasinglecollarsizesufficient
AT bejuihughuesjacques proximalfemoralanatomyandcollaredstemsinhiparthroplastyisasinglecollarsizesufficient
AT bothorelhugo proximalfemoralanatomyandcollaredstemsinhiparthroplastyisasinglecollarsizesufficient
AT saffarinimo proximalfemoralanatomyandcollaredstemsinhiparthroplastyisasinglecollarsizesufficient
AT bataillercecile proximalfemoralanatomyandcollaredstemsinhiparthroplastyisasinglecollarsizesufficient