Cargando…

Proteomics of Eosinophil Activation

We recently identified and quantified >7,000 proteins in non-activated human peripheral blood eosinophils using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) and described phosphoproteomic changes that accompany acute activation of eosinophils by interleukin-5 (IL5) (1). Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosher, Deane F., Wilkerson, Emily M., Turton, Keren B., Hebert, Alexander S., Coon, Joshua J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29034237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00159
_version_ 1783268605499015168
author Mosher, Deane F.
Wilkerson, Emily M.
Turton, Keren B.
Hebert, Alexander S.
Coon, Joshua J.
author_facet Mosher, Deane F.
Wilkerson, Emily M.
Turton, Keren B.
Hebert, Alexander S.
Coon, Joshua J.
author_sort Mosher, Deane F.
collection PubMed
description We recently identified and quantified >7,000 proteins in non-activated human peripheral blood eosinophils using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) and described phosphoproteomic changes that accompany acute activation of eosinophils by interleukin-5 (IL5) (1). These data comprise a treasure trove of information about eosinophils. We illustrate the power of label-free LC–MS/MS quantification by considering four examples: complexity of eosinophil STATs, contribution of immunoproteasome subunits to eosinophil proteasomes, complement of integrin subunits, and contribution of platelet proteins originating from platelet–eosinophil complexes to the overall proteome. We describe how isobaric labeling enables robust sample-to-sample comparisons and relate the 220 phosphosites that changed significantly upon treatment with IL5 to previous studies of eosinophil activation. Finally, we review previous attempts to leverage the power of mass spectrometry to discern differences between eosinophils of healthy subjects and those with eosinophil-associated conditions and point out features of label-free quantification and isobaric labeling that are important in planning future mass spectrometric studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5626809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56268092017-10-13 Proteomics of Eosinophil Activation Mosher, Deane F. Wilkerson, Emily M. Turton, Keren B. Hebert, Alexander S. Coon, Joshua J. Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine We recently identified and quantified >7,000 proteins in non-activated human peripheral blood eosinophils using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) and described phosphoproteomic changes that accompany acute activation of eosinophils by interleukin-5 (IL5) (1). These data comprise a treasure trove of information about eosinophils. We illustrate the power of label-free LC–MS/MS quantification by considering four examples: complexity of eosinophil STATs, contribution of immunoproteasome subunits to eosinophil proteasomes, complement of integrin subunits, and contribution of platelet proteins originating from platelet–eosinophil complexes to the overall proteome. We describe how isobaric labeling enables robust sample-to-sample comparisons and relate the 220 phosphosites that changed significantly upon treatment with IL5 to previous studies of eosinophil activation. Finally, we review previous attempts to leverage the power of mass spectrometry to discern differences between eosinophils of healthy subjects and those with eosinophil-associated conditions and point out features of label-free quantification and isobaric labeling that are important in planning future mass spectrometric studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5626809/ /pubmed/29034237 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00159 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mosher, Wilkerson, Turton, Hebert and Coon. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Mosher, Deane F.
Wilkerson, Emily M.
Turton, Keren B.
Hebert, Alexander S.
Coon, Joshua J.
Proteomics of Eosinophil Activation
title Proteomics of Eosinophil Activation
title_full Proteomics of Eosinophil Activation
title_fullStr Proteomics of Eosinophil Activation
title_full_unstemmed Proteomics of Eosinophil Activation
title_short Proteomics of Eosinophil Activation
title_sort proteomics of eosinophil activation
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5626809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29034237
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00159
work_keys_str_mv AT mosherdeanef proteomicsofeosinophilactivation
AT wilkersonemilym proteomicsofeosinophilactivation
AT turtonkerenb proteomicsofeosinophilactivation
AT hebertalexanders proteomicsofeosinophilactivation
AT coonjoshuaj proteomicsofeosinophilactivation