Cargando…
Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density
Vague and/or ad hoc definitions of the area sampled in monitoring efforts are common, and estimates of ecological state variables (e.g. distribution and abundance) can be sensitive to such specifications. The uncertainty in population metrics due to data deficiencies, vague definitions of space and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170374 |
_version_ | 1783268653550010368 |
---|---|
author | Schmidt, Benedikt R. Meier, Anita Sutherland, Chris Royle, J. Andy |
author_facet | Schmidt, Benedikt R. Meier, Anita Sutherland, Chris Royle, J. Andy |
author_sort | Schmidt, Benedikt R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Vague and/or ad hoc definitions of the area sampled in monitoring efforts are common, and estimates of ecological state variables (e.g. distribution and abundance) can be sensitive to such specifications. The uncertainty in population metrics due to data deficiencies, vague definitions of space and lack of standardized protocols is a major challenge for monitoring, managing and conserving amphibian and reptile populations globally. This is especially true for the slow-worm (Anguis fragilis), a cryptic and fossorial legless lizard; uncertainty about spatial variation in density has hindered conservation efforts (e.g. in translocation projects). Spatial capture–recapture (SCR) methods can be used to estimate density while simultaneously and explicitly accounting for space and individual movement. We use SCR to analyse mark–recapture data of the slow-worm that were collected using artificial cover objects (ACO). Detectability varied among ACO grids and through the season. Estimates of slow-worm density varied across ACO grids (13, 45 and 46 individuals ha(−1), respectively). The estimated 95% home range size of slow-worms was 0.38 ha. Our estimates provide valuable information about slow-worm spatial ecology that can be used to inform future conservation management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5627085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Royal Society Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56270852017-10-08 Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density Schmidt, Benedikt R. Meier, Anita Sutherland, Chris Royle, J. Andy R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Vague and/or ad hoc definitions of the area sampled in monitoring efforts are common, and estimates of ecological state variables (e.g. distribution and abundance) can be sensitive to such specifications. The uncertainty in population metrics due to data deficiencies, vague definitions of space and lack of standardized protocols is a major challenge for monitoring, managing and conserving amphibian and reptile populations globally. This is especially true for the slow-worm (Anguis fragilis), a cryptic and fossorial legless lizard; uncertainty about spatial variation in density has hindered conservation efforts (e.g. in translocation projects). Spatial capture–recapture (SCR) methods can be used to estimate density while simultaneously and explicitly accounting for space and individual movement. We use SCR to analyse mark–recapture data of the slow-worm that were collected using artificial cover objects (ACO). Detectability varied among ACO grids and through the season. Estimates of slow-worm density varied across ACO grids (13, 45 and 46 individuals ha(−1), respectively). The estimated 95% home range size of slow-worms was 0.38 ha. Our estimates provide valuable information about slow-worm spatial ecology that can be used to inform future conservation management. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5627085/ /pubmed/28989745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170374 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biology (Whole Organism) Schmidt, Benedikt R. Meier, Anita Sutherland, Chris Royle, J. Andy Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density |
title | Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density |
title_full | Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density |
title_fullStr | Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density |
title_full_unstemmed | Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density |
title_short | Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density |
title_sort | spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm anguis fragilis density |
topic | Biology (Whole Organism) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidtbenediktr spatialcapturerecaptureanalysisofartificialcoverboardsurveydatarevealssmallscalespatialvariationinslowwormanguisfragilisdensity AT meieranita spatialcapturerecaptureanalysisofartificialcoverboardsurveydatarevealssmallscalespatialvariationinslowwormanguisfragilisdensity AT sutherlandchris spatialcapturerecaptureanalysisofartificialcoverboardsurveydatarevealssmallscalespatialvariationinslowwormanguisfragilisdensity AT roylejandy spatialcapturerecaptureanalysisofartificialcoverboardsurveydatarevealssmallscalespatialvariationinslowwormanguisfragilisdensity |