Cargando…

Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density

Vague and/or ad hoc definitions of the area sampled in monitoring efforts are common, and estimates of ecological state variables (e.g. distribution and abundance) can be sensitive to such specifications. The uncertainty in population metrics due to data deficiencies, vague definitions of space and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt, Benedikt R., Meier, Anita, Sutherland, Chris, Royle, J. Andy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170374
_version_ 1783268653550010368
author Schmidt, Benedikt R.
Meier, Anita
Sutherland, Chris
Royle, J. Andy
author_facet Schmidt, Benedikt R.
Meier, Anita
Sutherland, Chris
Royle, J. Andy
author_sort Schmidt, Benedikt R.
collection PubMed
description Vague and/or ad hoc definitions of the area sampled in monitoring efforts are common, and estimates of ecological state variables (e.g. distribution and abundance) can be sensitive to such specifications. The uncertainty in population metrics due to data deficiencies, vague definitions of space and lack of standardized protocols is a major challenge for monitoring, managing and conserving amphibian and reptile populations globally. This is especially true for the slow-worm (Anguis fragilis), a cryptic and fossorial legless lizard; uncertainty about spatial variation in density has hindered conservation efforts (e.g. in translocation projects). Spatial capture–recapture (SCR) methods can be used to estimate density while simultaneously and explicitly accounting for space and individual movement. We use SCR to analyse mark–recapture data of the slow-worm that were collected using artificial cover objects (ACO). Detectability varied among ACO grids and through the season. Estimates of slow-worm density varied across ACO grids (13, 45 and 46 individuals ha(−1), respectively). The estimated 95% home range size of slow-worms was 0.38 ha. Our estimates provide valuable information about slow-worm spatial ecology that can be used to inform future conservation management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5627085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56270852017-10-08 Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density Schmidt, Benedikt R. Meier, Anita Sutherland, Chris Royle, J. Andy R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Vague and/or ad hoc definitions of the area sampled in monitoring efforts are common, and estimates of ecological state variables (e.g. distribution and abundance) can be sensitive to such specifications. The uncertainty in population metrics due to data deficiencies, vague definitions of space and lack of standardized protocols is a major challenge for monitoring, managing and conserving amphibian and reptile populations globally. This is especially true for the slow-worm (Anguis fragilis), a cryptic and fossorial legless lizard; uncertainty about spatial variation in density has hindered conservation efforts (e.g. in translocation projects). Spatial capture–recapture (SCR) methods can be used to estimate density while simultaneously and explicitly accounting for space and individual movement. We use SCR to analyse mark–recapture data of the slow-worm that were collected using artificial cover objects (ACO). Detectability varied among ACO grids and through the season. Estimates of slow-worm density varied across ACO grids (13, 45 and 46 individuals ha(−1), respectively). The estimated 95% home range size of slow-worms was 0.38 ha. Our estimates provide valuable information about slow-worm spatial ecology that can be used to inform future conservation management. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5627085/ /pubmed/28989745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170374 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Schmidt, Benedikt R.
Meier, Anita
Sutherland, Chris
Royle, J. Andy
Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density
title Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density
title_full Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density
title_fullStr Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density
title_full_unstemmed Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density
title_short Spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm Anguis fragilis density
title_sort spatial capture–recapture analysis of artificial cover board survey data reveals small scale spatial variation in slow-worm anguis fragilis density
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170374
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtbenediktr spatialcapturerecaptureanalysisofartificialcoverboardsurveydatarevealssmallscalespatialvariationinslowwormanguisfragilisdensity
AT meieranita spatialcapturerecaptureanalysisofartificialcoverboardsurveydatarevealssmallscalespatialvariationinslowwormanguisfragilisdensity
AT sutherlandchris spatialcapturerecaptureanalysisofartificialcoverboardsurveydatarevealssmallscalespatialvariationinslowwormanguisfragilisdensity
AT roylejandy spatialcapturerecaptureanalysisofartificialcoverboardsurveydatarevealssmallscalespatialvariationinslowwormanguisfragilisdensity