Cargando…
The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster
Variation in the quality and quantity of nutrition is a major contributor to phenotypic variation in animal populations. Although we know much of how dietary restriction impacts phenotype, and of the molecular-genetic and physiological mechanisms that underlie this response, we know much less of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170375 |
_version_ | 1783268653777551360 |
---|---|
author | Shingleton, Alexander W. Masandika, Josephine R. Thorsen, Lily S. Zhu, Yuqing Mirth, Christen K. |
author_facet | Shingleton, Alexander W. Masandika, Josephine R. Thorsen, Lily S. Zhu, Yuqing Mirth, Christen K. |
author_sort | Shingleton, Alexander W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Variation in the quality and quantity of nutrition is a major contributor to phenotypic variation in animal populations. Although we know much of how dietary restriction impacts phenotype, and of the molecular-genetic and physiological mechanisms that underlie this response, we know much less of the effects of dietary imbalance. Specifically, although dietary imbalance and restriction both reduce overall body size, it is unclear whether both have the same effect on the size of individual traits. Here, we use the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to explore the effect of dietary food versus protein-to-carbohydrate ratio on body proportion and trait size. Our results indicate that body proportion and trait size respond differently to changes in diet quantity (food concentration) versus diet quality (protein-to-carbohydrate ratio), and that these effects are sex specific. While these differences suggest that Drosophila use at least partially distinct developmental mechanisms to respond to diet quality versus quantity, further analysis indicates that the responses can be largely explained by the independent and contrasting effects of protein and carbohydrate concentration on trait size. Our data highlight the importance of considering macronutrient composition when elucidating the effect of nutrition on trait size, at the levels of both morphology and developmental physiology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5627086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Royal Society Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56270862017-10-08 The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster Shingleton, Alexander W. Masandika, Josephine R. Thorsen, Lily S. Zhu, Yuqing Mirth, Christen K. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Variation in the quality and quantity of nutrition is a major contributor to phenotypic variation in animal populations. Although we know much of how dietary restriction impacts phenotype, and of the molecular-genetic and physiological mechanisms that underlie this response, we know much less of the effects of dietary imbalance. Specifically, although dietary imbalance and restriction both reduce overall body size, it is unclear whether both have the same effect on the size of individual traits. Here, we use the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to explore the effect of dietary food versus protein-to-carbohydrate ratio on body proportion and trait size. Our results indicate that body proportion and trait size respond differently to changes in diet quantity (food concentration) versus diet quality (protein-to-carbohydrate ratio), and that these effects are sex specific. While these differences suggest that Drosophila use at least partially distinct developmental mechanisms to respond to diet quality versus quantity, further analysis indicates that the responses can be largely explained by the independent and contrasting effects of protein and carbohydrate concentration on trait size. Our data highlight the importance of considering macronutrient composition when elucidating the effect of nutrition on trait size, at the levels of both morphology and developmental physiology. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5627086/ /pubmed/28989746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170375 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biology (Whole Organism) Shingleton, Alexander W. Masandika, Josephine R. Thorsen, Lily S. Zhu, Yuqing Mirth, Christen K. The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster |
title | The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_full | The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_fullStr | The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_full_unstemmed | The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_short | The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster |
title_sort | sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in drosophila melanogaster |
topic | Biology (Whole Organism) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170375 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shingletonalexanderw thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster AT masandikajosephiner thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster AT thorsenlilys thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster AT zhuyuqing thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster AT mirthchristenk thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster AT shingletonalexanderw sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster AT masandikajosephiner sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster AT thorsenlilys sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster AT zhuyuqing sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster AT mirthchristenk sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster |