Cargando…

The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster

Variation in the quality and quantity of nutrition is a major contributor to phenotypic variation in animal populations. Although we know much of how dietary restriction impacts phenotype, and of the molecular-genetic and physiological mechanisms that underlie this response, we know much less of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shingleton, Alexander W., Masandika, Josephine R., Thorsen, Lily S., Zhu, Yuqing, Mirth, Christen K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170375
_version_ 1783268653777551360
author Shingleton, Alexander W.
Masandika, Josephine R.
Thorsen, Lily S.
Zhu, Yuqing
Mirth, Christen K.
author_facet Shingleton, Alexander W.
Masandika, Josephine R.
Thorsen, Lily S.
Zhu, Yuqing
Mirth, Christen K.
author_sort Shingleton, Alexander W.
collection PubMed
description Variation in the quality and quantity of nutrition is a major contributor to phenotypic variation in animal populations. Although we know much of how dietary restriction impacts phenotype, and of the molecular-genetic and physiological mechanisms that underlie this response, we know much less of the effects of dietary imbalance. Specifically, although dietary imbalance and restriction both reduce overall body size, it is unclear whether both have the same effect on the size of individual traits. Here, we use the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to explore the effect of dietary food versus protein-to-carbohydrate ratio on body proportion and trait size. Our results indicate that body proportion and trait size respond differently to changes in diet quantity (food concentration) versus diet quality (protein-to-carbohydrate ratio), and that these effects are sex specific. While these differences suggest that Drosophila use at least partially distinct developmental mechanisms to respond to diet quality versus quantity, further analysis indicates that the responses can be largely explained by the independent and contrasting effects of protein and carbohydrate concentration on trait size. Our data highlight the importance of considering macronutrient composition when elucidating the effect of nutrition on trait size, at the levels of both morphology and developmental physiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5627086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56270862017-10-08 The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster Shingleton, Alexander W. Masandika, Josephine R. Thorsen, Lily S. Zhu, Yuqing Mirth, Christen K. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Variation in the quality and quantity of nutrition is a major contributor to phenotypic variation in animal populations. Although we know much of how dietary restriction impacts phenotype, and of the molecular-genetic and physiological mechanisms that underlie this response, we know much less of the effects of dietary imbalance. Specifically, although dietary imbalance and restriction both reduce overall body size, it is unclear whether both have the same effect on the size of individual traits. Here, we use the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to explore the effect of dietary food versus protein-to-carbohydrate ratio on body proportion and trait size. Our results indicate that body proportion and trait size respond differently to changes in diet quantity (food concentration) versus diet quality (protein-to-carbohydrate ratio), and that these effects are sex specific. While these differences suggest that Drosophila use at least partially distinct developmental mechanisms to respond to diet quality versus quantity, further analysis indicates that the responses can be largely explained by the independent and contrasting effects of protein and carbohydrate concentration on trait size. Our data highlight the importance of considering macronutrient composition when elucidating the effect of nutrition on trait size, at the levels of both morphology and developmental physiology. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5627086/ /pubmed/28989746 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170375 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Shingleton, Alexander W.
Masandika, Josephine R.
Thorsen, Lily S.
Zhu, Yuqing
Mirth, Christen K.
The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster
title The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster
title_fullStr The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster
title_full_unstemmed The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster
title_short The sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in Drosophila melanogaster
title_sort sex-specific effects of diet quality versus quantity on morphology in drosophila melanogaster
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989746
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170375
work_keys_str_mv AT shingletonalexanderw thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster
AT masandikajosephiner thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster
AT thorsenlilys thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster
AT zhuyuqing thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster
AT mirthchristenk thesexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster
AT shingletonalexanderw sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster
AT masandikajosephiner sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster
AT thorsenlilys sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster
AT zhuyuqing sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster
AT mirthchristenk sexspecificeffectsofdietqualityversusquantityonmorphologyindrosophilamelanogaster