Cargando…
Efficacy of 0.05% epinastine and 0.1% olopatadine for allergic conjunctivitis as seasonal and preseasonal treatment
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.05% epinastine and 0.1% olopatadine eye drop preparations as seasonal and preseasonal treatments in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, case-control study involving two insti...
Autores principales: | Mizoguchi, Takanori, Ozaki, Mineo, Ogino, Nobuchika |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627751/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026285 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S141279 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Efficacy of olopatadine hydrochloride 0.1%, emedastine difumarate 0.05%, and loteprednol etabonate 0.5% for Chinese children with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: a randomized vehicle‐controlled study
por: Liu, Rui‐fen, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Management of allergic conjunctivitis: an evaluation of the perceived comfort and therapeutic efficacy of olopatadine 0.2% and azelastine 0.05% from two prospective studies
por: Epstein, Arthur B, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Additive intraocular pressure-lowering effect of dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination on prostaglandin monotherapy in patients with normal tension glaucoma
por: Mizoguchi, Takanori, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Efficacy of Olopatadine versus Epinastine for Treating Allergic Conjunctivitis Caused by Japanese Cedar Pollen: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
por: Fukushima, Atsuki, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Observer-masked trial comparing efficacy of topical olopatadine (0.1%), bepotastine (1.5%), and alcaftadine (0.25%) in mild to moderate allergic conjunctivitis
por: Dudeja, Lakshey, et al.
Publicado: (2019)