Cargando…

Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects

Near-patient testing (NPT) allows clinical decisions to be made in a rapid and convenient manner and is often cost effective. In COPD the peripheral blood eosinophil count has been demonstrated to have utility in providing prognostic information and predicting response to treatment during an acute e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hambleton, Kirsty, Connolly, Clare M, Borg, Catherine, Davies, Joanne H, Jeffers, Helen P, Russell, Richard EK, Bafadhel, Mona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026294
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S147216
_version_ 1783268763982888960
author Hambleton, Kirsty
Connolly, Clare M
Borg, Catherine
Davies, Joanne H
Jeffers, Helen P
Russell, Richard EK
Bafadhel, Mona
author_facet Hambleton, Kirsty
Connolly, Clare M
Borg, Catherine
Davies, Joanne H
Jeffers, Helen P
Russell, Richard EK
Bafadhel, Mona
author_sort Hambleton, Kirsty
collection PubMed
description Near-patient testing (NPT) allows clinical decisions to be made in a rapid and convenient manner and is often cost effective. In COPD the peripheral blood eosinophil count has been demonstrated to have utility in providing prognostic information and predicting response to treatment during an acute exacerbation. For this potential to be achieved having a reliable NPT of blood eosinophil count would be extremely useful. Therefore, we investigated the use of the HemoCue(®) WBC Diff System and evaluated its sensitivity and specificity in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects. This method requires a simple skin prick of blood and was compared to standard venepuncture laboratory analysis. The HemoCue(®) WBC Diff System measured the peripheral blood eosinophil count in healthy, asthma and COPD subjects with very close correlation to the eosinophil count as measured by standard venepuncture. The correlations were unaffected by disease status. This method for the measurement of the peripheral blood eosinophil count has the potential to provide rapid near-patient results and thus influence the speed of management decisions in the treatment of airway diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5627756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56277562017-10-12 Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects Hambleton, Kirsty Connolly, Clare M Borg, Catherine Davies, Joanne H Jeffers, Helen P Russell, Richard EK Bafadhel, Mona Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Short Report Near-patient testing (NPT) allows clinical decisions to be made in a rapid and convenient manner and is often cost effective. In COPD the peripheral blood eosinophil count has been demonstrated to have utility in providing prognostic information and predicting response to treatment during an acute exacerbation. For this potential to be achieved having a reliable NPT of blood eosinophil count would be extremely useful. Therefore, we investigated the use of the HemoCue(®) WBC Diff System and evaluated its sensitivity and specificity in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects. This method requires a simple skin prick of blood and was compared to standard venepuncture laboratory analysis. The HemoCue(®) WBC Diff System measured the peripheral blood eosinophil count in healthy, asthma and COPD subjects with very close correlation to the eosinophil count as measured by standard venepuncture. The correlations were unaffected by disease status. This method for the measurement of the peripheral blood eosinophil count has the potential to provide rapid near-patient results and thus influence the speed of management decisions in the treatment of airway diseases. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5627756/ /pubmed/29026294 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S147216 Text en © 2017 Hambleton et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Short Report
Hambleton, Kirsty
Connolly, Clare M
Borg, Catherine
Davies, Joanne H
Jeffers, Helen P
Russell, Richard EK
Bafadhel, Mona
Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects
title Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects
title_full Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects
title_fullStr Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects
title_short Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects
title_sort comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and copd subjects
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026294
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S147216
work_keys_str_mv AT hambletonkirsty comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects
AT connollyclarem comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects
AT borgcatherine comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects
AT daviesjoanneh comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects
AT jeffershelenp comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects
AT russellrichardek comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects
AT bafadhelmona comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects