Cargando…
Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects
Near-patient testing (NPT) allows clinical decisions to be made in a rapid and convenient manner and is often cost effective. In COPD the peripheral blood eosinophil count has been demonstrated to have utility in providing prognostic information and predicting response to treatment during an acute e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026294 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S147216 |
_version_ | 1783268763982888960 |
---|---|
author | Hambleton, Kirsty Connolly, Clare M Borg, Catherine Davies, Joanne H Jeffers, Helen P Russell, Richard EK Bafadhel, Mona |
author_facet | Hambleton, Kirsty Connolly, Clare M Borg, Catherine Davies, Joanne H Jeffers, Helen P Russell, Richard EK Bafadhel, Mona |
author_sort | Hambleton, Kirsty |
collection | PubMed |
description | Near-patient testing (NPT) allows clinical decisions to be made in a rapid and convenient manner and is often cost effective. In COPD the peripheral blood eosinophil count has been demonstrated to have utility in providing prognostic information and predicting response to treatment during an acute exacerbation. For this potential to be achieved having a reliable NPT of blood eosinophil count would be extremely useful. Therefore, we investigated the use of the HemoCue(®) WBC Diff System and evaluated its sensitivity and specificity in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects. This method requires a simple skin prick of blood and was compared to standard venepuncture laboratory analysis. The HemoCue(®) WBC Diff System measured the peripheral blood eosinophil count in healthy, asthma and COPD subjects with very close correlation to the eosinophil count as measured by standard venepuncture. The correlations were unaffected by disease status. This method for the measurement of the peripheral blood eosinophil count has the potential to provide rapid near-patient results and thus influence the speed of management decisions in the treatment of airway diseases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5627756 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56277562017-10-12 Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects Hambleton, Kirsty Connolly, Clare M Borg, Catherine Davies, Joanne H Jeffers, Helen P Russell, Richard EK Bafadhel, Mona Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Short Report Near-patient testing (NPT) allows clinical decisions to be made in a rapid and convenient manner and is often cost effective. In COPD the peripheral blood eosinophil count has been demonstrated to have utility in providing prognostic information and predicting response to treatment during an acute exacerbation. For this potential to be achieved having a reliable NPT of blood eosinophil count would be extremely useful. Therefore, we investigated the use of the HemoCue(®) WBC Diff System and evaluated its sensitivity and specificity in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects. This method requires a simple skin prick of blood and was compared to standard venepuncture laboratory analysis. The HemoCue(®) WBC Diff System measured the peripheral blood eosinophil count in healthy, asthma and COPD subjects with very close correlation to the eosinophil count as measured by standard venepuncture. The correlations were unaffected by disease status. This method for the measurement of the peripheral blood eosinophil count has the potential to provide rapid near-patient results and thus influence the speed of management decisions in the treatment of airway diseases. Dove Medical Press 2017-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5627756/ /pubmed/29026294 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S147216 Text en © 2017 Hambleton et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Hambleton, Kirsty Connolly, Clare M Borg, Catherine Davies, Joanne H Jeffers, Helen P Russell, Richard EK Bafadhel, Mona Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects |
title | Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects |
title_full | Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects |
title_short | Comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and COPD subjects |
title_sort | comparison of the peripheral blood eosinophil count using near-patient testing and standard automated laboratory measurement in healthy, asthmatic and copd subjects |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627756/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026294 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S147216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hambletonkirsty comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects AT connollyclarem comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects AT borgcatherine comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects AT daviesjoanneh comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects AT jeffershelenp comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects AT russellrichardek comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects AT bafadhelmona comparisonoftheperipheralbloodeosinophilcountusingnearpatienttestingandstandardautomatedlaboratorymeasurementinhealthyasthmaticandcopdsubjects |