Cargando…

A Process Evaluation to Assess Contextual Factors Associated With the Uptake of a Rapid Response Service to Support Health Systems’ Decision-Making in Uganda

Background: Although proven feasible, rapid response services (RRSs) to support urgent decision and policymaking are still a fairly new and innovative strategy in several health systems, more especially in low-income countries. There are several information gaps about these RRSs that exist including...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona, Sewankambo, Nelson K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28949472
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.04
_version_ 1783268766319116288
author Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona
Sewankambo, Nelson K.
author_facet Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona
Sewankambo, Nelson K.
author_sort Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona
collection PubMed
description Background: Although proven feasible, rapid response services (RRSs) to support urgent decision and policymaking are still a fairly new and innovative strategy in several health systems, more especially in low-income countries. There are several information gaps about these RRSs that exist including the factors that make them work in different contexts and in addition what affects their uptake by potential end users. Methods: We used a case study employing process evaluation methods to determine what contextual factors affect the utilization of a RRS in Uganda. We held in-depth interviews with researchers, knowledge translation (KT) specialists and policy-makers from several research and policy-making institutions in Uganda’s health sector. We analyzed the data using thematic analysis to develop categories and themes about activities and structures under given program components that affected uptake of the service. Results: We identified several factors under three themes that have both overlapping relations and also reinforcing loops amplifying each other: Internal factors (those factors that were identified as over which the RRS had full [or almost full] control); external factors (factors over which the service had only partial influence, a second party holds part of this influence); and environmental factors (factors over which the service had no or only remote control if at all). Internal factors were the design of the service and resources available for it, while the external factors were the service’s visibility, integrity and relationships. Environmental factors were political will and health system policy and decision-making infrastructure. Conclusion: For health systems practitioners considering RRSs, knowing what factors will affect uptake and therefore modifying them within their contexts is important to ensure efficient use and successful utilization of the mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5627784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56277842017-10-10 A Process Evaluation to Assess Contextual Factors Associated With the Uptake of a Rapid Response Service to Support Health Systems’ Decision-Making in Uganda Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona Sewankambo, Nelson K. Int J Health Policy Manag Original Article Background: Although proven feasible, rapid response services (RRSs) to support urgent decision and policymaking are still a fairly new and innovative strategy in several health systems, more especially in low-income countries. There are several information gaps about these RRSs that exist including the factors that make them work in different contexts and in addition what affects their uptake by potential end users. Methods: We used a case study employing process evaluation methods to determine what contextual factors affect the utilization of a RRS in Uganda. We held in-depth interviews with researchers, knowledge translation (KT) specialists and policy-makers from several research and policy-making institutions in Uganda’s health sector. We analyzed the data using thematic analysis to develop categories and themes about activities and structures under given program components that affected uptake of the service. Results: We identified several factors under three themes that have both overlapping relations and also reinforcing loops amplifying each other: Internal factors (those factors that were identified as over which the RRS had full [or almost full] control); external factors (factors over which the service had only partial influence, a second party holds part of this influence); and environmental factors (factors over which the service had no or only remote control if at all). Internal factors were the design of the service and resources available for it, while the external factors were the service’s visibility, integrity and relationships. Environmental factors were political will and health system policy and decision-making infrastructure. Conclusion: For health systems practitioners considering RRSs, knowing what factors will affect uptake and therefore modifying them within their contexts is important to ensure efficient use and successful utilization of the mechanisms. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2017-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5627784/ /pubmed/28949472 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.04 Text en © 2017 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona
Sewankambo, Nelson K.
A Process Evaluation to Assess Contextual Factors Associated With the Uptake of a Rapid Response Service to Support Health Systems’ Decision-Making in Uganda
title A Process Evaluation to Assess Contextual Factors Associated With the Uptake of a Rapid Response Service to Support Health Systems’ Decision-Making in Uganda
title_full A Process Evaluation to Assess Contextual Factors Associated With the Uptake of a Rapid Response Service to Support Health Systems’ Decision-Making in Uganda
title_fullStr A Process Evaluation to Assess Contextual Factors Associated With the Uptake of a Rapid Response Service to Support Health Systems’ Decision-Making in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed A Process Evaluation to Assess Contextual Factors Associated With the Uptake of a Rapid Response Service to Support Health Systems’ Decision-Making in Uganda
title_short A Process Evaluation to Assess Contextual Factors Associated With the Uptake of a Rapid Response Service to Support Health Systems’ Decision-Making in Uganda
title_sort process evaluation to assess contextual factors associated with the uptake of a rapid response service to support health systems’ decision-making in uganda
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5627784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28949472
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.04
work_keys_str_mv AT mijumbideverhona aprocessevaluationtoassesscontextualfactorsassociatedwiththeuptakeofarapidresponseservicetosupporthealthsystemsdecisionmakinginuganda
AT sewankambonelsonk aprocessevaluationtoassesscontextualfactorsassociatedwiththeuptakeofarapidresponseservicetosupporthealthsystemsdecisionmakinginuganda
AT mijumbideverhona processevaluationtoassesscontextualfactorsassociatedwiththeuptakeofarapidresponseservicetosupporthealthsystemsdecisionmakinginuganda
AT sewankambonelsonk processevaluationtoassesscontextualfactorsassociatedwiththeuptakeofarapidresponseservicetosupporthealthsystemsdecisionmakinginuganda