Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time

Recently published study of Ma et al. evaluates two relatively novel measures of fluid responsiveness, carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time (ccFT). Both measures have been recently quoted as possibly useful, technically simple, and noninvasive dynamic tools in predicting fluid responsi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barjaktarevic, Igor, Chiem, Alan, Cannesson, Maxime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2017
Materias:
Letter to the Editor
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28980175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0076-x
_version_ 1783268819655983104
author Barjaktarevic, Igor
Chiem, Alan
Cannesson, Maxime
author_facet Barjaktarevic, Igor
Chiem, Alan
Cannesson, Maxime
author_sort Barjaktarevic, Igor
collection PubMed
description Recently published study of Ma et al. evaluates two relatively novel measures of fluid responsiveness, carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time (ccFT). Both measures have been recently quoted as possibly useful, technically simple, and noninvasive dynamic tools in predicting fluid responsiveness. Recently, more research interest has been focused on ccFT and, intrigued by the data presented in this study, we discuss here the impact of the data presented in the paper of Ma et al. to the significance of this metric as a potential tool in the assessment of fluid responsiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5628080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56280802017-10-17 Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time Barjaktarevic, Igor Chiem, Alan Cannesson, Maxime Crit Ultrasound J Letter to the Editor Recently published study of Ma et al. evaluates two relatively novel measures of fluid responsiveness, carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time (ccFT). Both measures have been recently quoted as possibly useful, technically simple, and noninvasive dynamic tools in predicting fluid responsiveness. Recently, more research interest has been focused on ccFT and, intrigued by the data presented in this study, we discuss here the impact of the data presented in the paper of Ma et al. to the significance of this metric as a potential tool in the assessment of fluid responsiveness. Springer Milan 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5628080/ /pubmed/28980175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0076-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Letter to the Editor
Barjaktarevic, Igor
Chiem, Alan
Cannesson, Maxime
Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time
title Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time
title_full Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time
title_fullStr Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time
title_full_unstemmed Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time
title_short Time to correct the flow of corrected flow time
title_sort time to correct the flow of corrected flow time
topic Letter to the Editor
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28980175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-017-0076-x
work_keys_str_mv AT barjaktarevicigor timetocorrecttheflowofcorrectedflowtime
AT chiemalan timetocorrecttheflowofcorrectedflowtime
AT cannessonmaxime timetocorrecttheflowofcorrectedflowtime

Ejemplares similares