Cargando…

Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China): results from a prospective double-blind randomised clinical trial

AIM: The role of clopidogrel in treating patients with acute ischaemic stroke is unclear. We have conducted the clinical trial in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel with a loading dose in treating patients with non-cardiogenic acute ischaemic stroke. METHOD: Clopidogrel loading...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Ying, Yang, Wanyong, Tan, Zefeng, Wang, Wenmin, Xiao, Weimin, Zeng, Jinsheng, Xu, Anding
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Stroke & Vascular Neurology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000072
_version_ 1783268871949516800
author Zhao, Ying
Yang, Wanyong
Tan, Zefeng
Wang, Wenmin
Xiao, Weimin
Zeng, Jinsheng
Xu, Anding
author_facet Zhao, Ying
Yang, Wanyong
Tan, Zefeng
Wang, Wenmin
Xiao, Weimin
Zeng, Jinsheng
Xu, Anding
author_sort Zhao, Ying
collection PubMed
description AIM: The role of clopidogrel in treating patients with acute ischaemic stroke is unclear. We have conducted the clinical trial in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel with a loading dose in treating patients with non-cardiogenic acute ischaemic stroke. METHOD: Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China) was a prospective, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial in China. Patients with acute ischaemic stroke of non-cardiogenic origin within 48 hours of onset were enrolled and those received thrombolysis were excluded. Enrolled patients were divided into two treatment groups: loading dose and routine dose. The primary outcome was the incidence of stroke recurrence or progression within 7 days. Primary safety outcome was measured by life-threatening haemorrhage. An intent-to-treat analysis was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: From March 2008 to March 2010, a total of 303 patients from 16 centres were recruited into this study; six were excluded because of lack of basic information. Since the enrolment was slow and the study drug expired in March 2010, this clinical trial was stopped earlier than planned. No significant baseline and demographic differences were seen between the two groups. There was no difference in primary outcome between the loading dosage group 16.1% (24/149) and control group 14.9% (22/148), respectively (p=0.782). The mortality and disability rate within 90 days in loading dose group (19.6%) was slightly lower than that in controlled group (23.4%), p=0.444. Loading dose group had two (1.3%) cases of fatal haemorrhage and control group had four (2.7%) within 90 days, p=0.674. No significant difference was detected in other adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSION: In our study stopped early due to slow enrolment, loading dose of clopidogrel does not reduce the risk of recurrent stroke. Future trials with sufficient number of patients enrolled are needed to re-examine this hypothesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5628375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Stroke & Vascular Neurology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56283752017-10-06 Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China): results from a prospective double-blind randomised clinical trial Zhao, Ying Yang, Wanyong Tan, Zefeng Wang, Wenmin Xiao, Weimin Zeng, Jinsheng Xu, Anding Stroke Vasc Neurol Original Article AIM: The role of clopidogrel in treating patients with acute ischaemic stroke is unclear. We have conducted the clinical trial in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel with a loading dose in treating patients with non-cardiogenic acute ischaemic stroke. METHOD: Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China) was a prospective, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical trial in China. Patients with acute ischaemic stroke of non-cardiogenic origin within 48 hours of onset were enrolled and those received thrombolysis were excluded. Enrolled patients were divided into two treatment groups: loading dose and routine dose. The primary outcome was the incidence of stroke recurrence or progression within 7 days. Primary safety outcome was measured by life-threatening haemorrhage. An intent-to-treat analysis was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: From March 2008 to March 2010, a total of 303 patients from 16 centres were recruited into this study; six were excluded because of lack of basic information. Since the enrolment was slow and the study drug expired in March 2010, this clinical trial was stopped earlier than planned. No significant baseline and demographic differences were seen between the two groups. There was no difference in primary outcome between the loading dosage group 16.1% (24/149) and control group 14.9% (22/148), respectively (p=0.782). The mortality and disability rate within 90 days in loading dose group (19.6%) was slightly lower than that in controlled group (23.4%), p=0.444. Loading dose group had two (1.3%) cases of fatal haemorrhage and control group had four (2.7%) within 90 days, p=0.674. No significant difference was detected in other adverse events between the groups. CONCLUSION: In our study stopped early due to slow enrolment, loading dose of clopidogrel does not reduce the risk of recurrent stroke. Future trials with sufficient number of patients enrolled are needed to re-examine this hypothesis. Stroke & Vascular Neurology 2017-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5628375/ /pubmed/28989802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000072 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhao, Ying
Yang, Wanyong
Tan, Zefeng
Wang, Wenmin
Xiao, Weimin
Zeng, Jinsheng
Xu, Anding
Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China): results from a prospective double-blind randomised clinical trial
title Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China): results from a prospective double-blind randomised clinical trial
title_full Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China): results from a prospective double-blind randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China): results from a prospective double-blind randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China): results from a prospective double-blind randomised clinical trial
title_short Clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in China (CLASS-China): results from a prospective double-blind randomised clinical trial
title_sort clopidogrel loading dose versus maintenance dose to treat patients with acute ischaemic stroke in china (class-china): results from a prospective double-blind randomised clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28989802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000072
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoying clopidogrelloadingdoseversusmaintenancedosetotreatpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeinchinaclasschinaresultsfromaprospectivedoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT yangwanyong clopidogrelloadingdoseversusmaintenancedosetotreatpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeinchinaclasschinaresultsfromaprospectivedoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT tanzefeng clopidogrelloadingdoseversusmaintenancedosetotreatpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeinchinaclasschinaresultsfromaprospectivedoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT wangwenmin clopidogrelloadingdoseversusmaintenancedosetotreatpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeinchinaclasschinaresultsfromaprospectivedoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT xiaoweimin clopidogrelloadingdoseversusmaintenancedosetotreatpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeinchinaclasschinaresultsfromaprospectivedoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT zengjinsheng clopidogrelloadingdoseversusmaintenancedosetotreatpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeinchinaclasschinaresultsfromaprospectivedoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT xuanding clopidogrelloadingdoseversusmaintenancedosetotreatpatientswithacuteischaemicstrokeinchinaclasschinaresultsfromaprospectivedoubleblindrandomisedclinicaltrial