Cargando…

Respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced FDG PET-CT for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume

BACKGROUND: To assess the feasibility and potential impact on target delineation of respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced (18)Fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography - computed tomography (PET-CT), in the treatment planning position, for a prospective cohort of patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scarsbrook, Andrew, Ward, Gillian, Murray, Patrick, Goody, Rebecca, Marshall, Karen, McDermott, Garry, Prestwich, Robin, Radhakrishna, Ganesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28978306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3659-9
_version_ 1783268882230804480
author Scarsbrook, Andrew
Ward, Gillian
Murray, Patrick
Goody, Rebecca
Marshall, Karen
McDermott, Garry
Prestwich, Robin
Radhakrishna, Ganesh
author_facet Scarsbrook, Andrew
Ward, Gillian
Murray, Patrick
Goody, Rebecca
Marshall, Karen
McDermott, Garry
Prestwich, Robin
Radhakrishna, Ganesh
author_sort Scarsbrook, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To assess the feasibility and potential impact on target delineation of respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced (18)Fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography - computed tomography (PET-CT), in the treatment planning position, for a prospective cohort of patients with lower third oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Fifteen patients were recruited into the study. Imaging included 4D PET-CT, 3D PET-CT, endoscopic ultrasound and planning 4D CT. Target volume delineation was performed on 4D CT, 4D CT with co-registered 3D PET and 4D PET-CT. Planning target volumes (PTV) generated with 4D CT (PTV(4DCT),) 4D CT co-registered with 3D PET-CT (PTV(3DPET4DCT)) and 4D PET-CT (PTV(4DPETCT)) were compared with multiple positional metrics. RESULTS: Mean PTV(4DCT), PTV(3DPET4DCT) and PTV(4DPETCT) were 582.4 ± 275.1 cm(3), 472.5 ± 193.1 cm(3) and 480.6 ± 236.9 cm(3) respectively (no significant difference). Median DICE similarity coefficients comparing PTV(4DCT) with PTV(3DPET4DCT,) PTV(4DCT) with PTV(4DPETCT) and PTV(3DPET4DCT) with PTV(4DPETCT) were 0.85 (range 0.65–0.9), 0.85 (range 0.69–0.9) and 0.88 (range 0.79–0.9) respectively. The median sensitivity index for overlap comparing PTV(4DCT) with PTV(3DPET4DCT,) PTV(4DCT) with PTV(4DPETCT) and PTV(3DPET4DCT) with PTV(4DPETCT) were 0.78 (range 0.65–0.9), 0.79 (range 0.65–0.9) and 0.89 (range 0.68–0.94) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Planning 4D PET-CT is feasible with careful patient selection. PTV generated using 4D CT, 3D PET-CT and 4D PET-CT were of similar volume, however, overlap analysis demonstrated that approximately 20% of PTV(3DPETCT) and PTV(4DPETCT) are not included in PTV(4DCT), leading to under-coverage of target volume and a potential geometric miss. Additionally, differences between PTV(3DPET4DCT) and PTV(4DPETCT) suggest a potential benefit for 4D PET-CT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier – NCT02285660 (Registered 21/10/2014).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5628433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56284332017-10-13 Respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced FDG PET-CT for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume Scarsbrook, Andrew Ward, Gillian Murray, Patrick Goody, Rebecca Marshall, Karen McDermott, Garry Prestwich, Robin Radhakrishna, Ganesh BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: To assess the feasibility and potential impact on target delineation of respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced (18)Fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography - computed tomography (PET-CT), in the treatment planning position, for a prospective cohort of patients with lower third oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Fifteen patients were recruited into the study. Imaging included 4D PET-CT, 3D PET-CT, endoscopic ultrasound and planning 4D CT. Target volume delineation was performed on 4D CT, 4D CT with co-registered 3D PET and 4D PET-CT. Planning target volumes (PTV) generated with 4D CT (PTV(4DCT),) 4D CT co-registered with 3D PET-CT (PTV(3DPET4DCT)) and 4D PET-CT (PTV(4DPETCT)) were compared with multiple positional metrics. RESULTS: Mean PTV(4DCT), PTV(3DPET4DCT) and PTV(4DPETCT) were 582.4 ± 275.1 cm(3), 472.5 ± 193.1 cm(3) and 480.6 ± 236.9 cm(3) respectively (no significant difference). Median DICE similarity coefficients comparing PTV(4DCT) with PTV(3DPET4DCT,) PTV(4DCT) with PTV(4DPETCT) and PTV(3DPET4DCT) with PTV(4DPETCT) were 0.85 (range 0.65–0.9), 0.85 (range 0.69–0.9) and 0.88 (range 0.79–0.9) respectively. The median sensitivity index for overlap comparing PTV(4DCT) with PTV(3DPET4DCT,) PTV(4DCT) with PTV(4DPETCT) and PTV(3DPET4DCT) with PTV(4DPETCT) were 0.78 (range 0.65–0.9), 0.79 (range 0.65–0.9) and 0.89 (range 0.68–0.94) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Planning 4D PET-CT is feasible with careful patient selection. PTV generated using 4D CT, 3D PET-CT and 4D PET-CT were of similar volume, however, overlap analysis demonstrated that approximately 20% of PTV(3DPETCT) and PTV(4DPETCT) are not included in PTV(4DCT), leading to under-coverage of target volume and a potential geometric miss. Additionally, differences between PTV(3DPET4DCT) and PTV(4DPETCT) suggest a potential benefit for 4D PET-CT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier – NCT02285660 (Registered 21/10/2014). BioMed Central 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5628433/ /pubmed/28978306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3659-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scarsbrook, Andrew
Ward, Gillian
Murray, Patrick
Goody, Rebecca
Marshall, Karen
McDermott, Garry
Prestwich, Robin
Radhakrishna, Ganesh
Respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced FDG PET-CT for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume
title Respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced FDG PET-CT for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume
title_full Respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced FDG PET-CT for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume
title_fullStr Respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced FDG PET-CT for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume
title_full_unstemmed Respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced FDG PET-CT for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume
title_short Respiratory-gated (4D) contrast-enhanced FDG PET-CT for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume
title_sort respiratory-gated (4d) contrast-enhanced fdg pet-ct for radiotherapy planning of lower oesophageal carcinoma: feasibility and impact on planning target volume
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28978306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3659-9
work_keys_str_mv AT scarsbrookandrew respiratorygated4dcontrastenhancedfdgpetctforradiotherapyplanningofloweroesophagealcarcinomafeasibilityandimpactonplanningtargetvolume
AT wardgillian respiratorygated4dcontrastenhancedfdgpetctforradiotherapyplanningofloweroesophagealcarcinomafeasibilityandimpactonplanningtargetvolume
AT murraypatrick respiratorygated4dcontrastenhancedfdgpetctforradiotherapyplanningofloweroesophagealcarcinomafeasibilityandimpactonplanningtargetvolume
AT goodyrebecca respiratorygated4dcontrastenhancedfdgpetctforradiotherapyplanningofloweroesophagealcarcinomafeasibilityandimpactonplanningtargetvolume
AT marshallkaren respiratorygated4dcontrastenhancedfdgpetctforradiotherapyplanningofloweroesophagealcarcinomafeasibilityandimpactonplanningtargetvolume
AT mcdermottgarry respiratorygated4dcontrastenhancedfdgpetctforradiotherapyplanningofloweroesophagealcarcinomafeasibilityandimpactonplanningtargetvolume
AT prestwichrobin respiratorygated4dcontrastenhancedfdgpetctforradiotherapyplanningofloweroesophagealcarcinomafeasibilityandimpactonplanningtargetvolume
AT radhakrishnaganesh respiratorygated4dcontrastenhancedfdgpetctforradiotherapyplanningofloweroesophagealcarcinomafeasibilityandimpactonplanningtargetvolume