Cargando…

Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study

BACKGROUND: The HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) aims to measure symptoms of anxiety (HADS Anxiety) and depression (HADS Depression). The HADS is widely used but has shown ambiguous results both regarding the factor structure and sex differences in the prevalence of depressive symptoms....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Djukanovic, Ingrid, Carlsson, Jörg, Årestedt, Kristofer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28978356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0759-9
_version_ 1783268883162988544
author Djukanovic, Ingrid
Carlsson, Jörg
Årestedt, Kristofer
author_facet Djukanovic, Ingrid
Carlsson, Jörg
Årestedt, Kristofer
author_sort Djukanovic, Ingrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) aims to measure symptoms of anxiety (HADS Anxiety) and depression (HADS Depression). The HADS is widely used but has shown ambiguous results both regarding the factor structure and sex differences in the prevalence of depressive symptoms. There is also a lack of psychometric evaluations of the HADS in non-clinical samples of older people. The aim of the study was to evaluate the factor structure of the HADS in a general population 65–80 years old and to exam possible presence of differential item functioning (DIF) with respect to sex. METHODS: This study was based on data from a Swedish sample, randomized from the total population in the age group 65–80 years (n = 6659). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed to examine the factor structure. Ordinal regression analyses were conducted to detect DIF for sex. Reliability was examined by both ordinal as well as traditional Cronbach’s alpha. RESULTS: The CFA showed a two-factor model with cross-loadings for two items (7 and 8) had excellent model fit. Internal consistency was good in both subscales, measured with ordinal and traditional alpha. Floor effects were presented for all items. No indication for meaningful DIF regarding sex was found for any of the subscales. CONCLUSIONS: HADS Anxiety and HADS Depression are unidimensional measures with acceptable internal consistency and are invariant with regard to sex. Despite pronounced ceiling effects and cross-loadings for item 7 and 8, the hypothesized two-factor model of HADS can be recommended to assess psychological distress among a general population 65–80 years old.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5628437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56284372017-10-13 Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study Djukanovic, Ingrid Carlsson, Jörg Årestedt, Kristofer Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) aims to measure symptoms of anxiety (HADS Anxiety) and depression (HADS Depression). The HADS is widely used but has shown ambiguous results both regarding the factor structure and sex differences in the prevalence of depressive symptoms. There is also a lack of psychometric evaluations of the HADS in non-clinical samples of older people. The aim of the study was to evaluate the factor structure of the HADS in a general population 65–80 years old and to exam possible presence of differential item functioning (DIF) with respect to sex. METHODS: This study was based on data from a Swedish sample, randomized from the total population in the age group 65–80 years (n = 6659). Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed to examine the factor structure. Ordinal regression analyses were conducted to detect DIF for sex. Reliability was examined by both ordinal as well as traditional Cronbach’s alpha. RESULTS: The CFA showed a two-factor model with cross-loadings for two items (7 and 8) had excellent model fit. Internal consistency was good in both subscales, measured with ordinal and traditional alpha. Floor effects were presented for all items. No indication for meaningful DIF regarding sex was found for any of the subscales. CONCLUSIONS: HADS Anxiety and HADS Depression are unidimensional measures with acceptable internal consistency and are invariant with regard to sex. Despite pronounced ceiling effects and cross-loadings for item 7 and 8, the hypothesized two-factor model of HADS can be recommended to assess psychological distress among a general population 65–80 years old. BioMed Central 2017-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5628437/ /pubmed/28978356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0759-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Djukanovic, Ingrid
Carlsson, Jörg
Årestedt, Kristofer
Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study
title Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study
title_full Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study
title_fullStr Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study
title_full_unstemmed Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study
title_short Is the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? A psychometric evaluation study
title_sort is the hospital anxiety and depression scale (hads) a valid measure in a general population 65–80 years old? a psychometric evaluation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28978356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0759-9
work_keys_str_mv AT djukanovicingrid isthehospitalanxietyanddepressionscalehadsavalidmeasureinageneralpopulation6580yearsoldapsychometricevaluationstudy
AT carlssonjorg isthehospitalanxietyanddepressionscalehadsavalidmeasureinageneralpopulation6580yearsoldapsychometricevaluationstudy
AT arestedtkristofer isthehospitalanxietyanddepressionscalehadsavalidmeasureinageneralpopulation6580yearsoldapsychometricevaluationstudy