Cargando…
Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data
A variety of models have been proposed to explain regions of recurrent somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) in human cancer. Our study employs Whole Genome DNA Sequence (WGS) data from tumor samples (n = 103) to comprehensively assess the role of the Knudson two hit genetic model in SCNA generation...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28945760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007001 |
_version_ | 1783268968861007872 |
---|---|
author | Camacho, Niedzica Van Loo, Peter Edwards, Sandra Kay, Jonathan D. Matthews, Lucy Haase, Kerstin Clark, Jeremy Dennis, Nening Thomas, Sarah Kremeyer, Barbara Zamora, Jorge Butler, Adam P. Gundem, Gunes Merson, Sue Luxton, Hayley Hawkins, Steve Ghori, Mohammed Marsden, Luke Lambert, Adam Karaszi, Katalin Pelvender, Gill Massie, Charlie E. Kote-Jarai, Zsofia Raine, Keiran Jones, David Howat, William J. Hazell, Steven Livni, Naomi Fisher, Cyril Ogden, Christopher Kumar, Pardeep Thompson, Alan Nicol, David Mayer, Erik Dudderidge, Tim Yu, Yongwei Zhang, Hongwei Shah, Nimish C. Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. Isaacs, William Visakorpi, Tapio Hamdy, Freddie Berney, Dan Verrill, Clare Warren, Anne Y. Wedge, David C. Lynch, Andrew G. Foster, Christopher S. Lu, Yong Jie Bova, G. Steven Whitaker, Hayley C. McDermott, Ultan Neal, David E. Eeles, Rosalind Cooper, Colin S. Brewer, Daniel S. |
author_facet | Camacho, Niedzica Van Loo, Peter Edwards, Sandra Kay, Jonathan D. Matthews, Lucy Haase, Kerstin Clark, Jeremy Dennis, Nening Thomas, Sarah Kremeyer, Barbara Zamora, Jorge Butler, Adam P. Gundem, Gunes Merson, Sue Luxton, Hayley Hawkins, Steve Ghori, Mohammed Marsden, Luke Lambert, Adam Karaszi, Katalin Pelvender, Gill Massie, Charlie E. Kote-Jarai, Zsofia Raine, Keiran Jones, David Howat, William J. Hazell, Steven Livni, Naomi Fisher, Cyril Ogden, Christopher Kumar, Pardeep Thompson, Alan Nicol, David Mayer, Erik Dudderidge, Tim Yu, Yongwei Zhang, Hongwei Shah, Nimish C. Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. Isaacs, William Visakorpi, Tapio Hamdy, Freddie Berney, Dan Verrill, Clare Warren, Anne Y. Wedge, David C. Lynch, Andrew G. Foster, Christopher S. Lu, Yong Jie Bova, G. Steven Whitaker, Hayley C. McDermott, Ultan Neal, David E. Eeles, Rosalind Cooper, Colin S. Brewer, Daniel S. |
author_sort | Camacho, Niedzica |
collection | PubMed |
description | A variety of models have been proposed to explain regions of recurrent somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) in human cancer. Our study employs Whole Genome DNA Sequence (WGS) data from tumor samples (n = 103) to comprehensively assess the role of the Knudson two hit genetic model in SCNA generation in prostate cancer. 64 recurrent regions of loss and gain were detected, of which 28 were novel, including regions of loss with more than 15% frequency at Chr4p15.2-p15.1 (15.53%), Chr6q27 (16.50%) and Chr18q12.3 (17.48%). Comprehensive mutation screens of genes, lincRNA encoding sequences, control regions and conserved domains within SCNAs demonstrated that a two-hit genetic model was supported in only a minor proportion of recurrent SCNA losses examined (15/40). We found that recurrent breakpoints and regions of inversion often occur within Knudson model SCNAs, leading to the identification of ZNF292 as a target gene for the deletion at 6q14.3-q15 and NKX3.1 as a two-hit target at 8p21.3-p21.2. The importance of alterations of lincRNA sequences was illustrated by the identification of a novel mutational hotspot at the KCCAT42, FENDRR, CAT1886 and STCAT2 loci at the 16q23.1-q24.3 loss. Our data confirm that the burden of SCNAs is predictive of biochemical recurrence, define nine individual regions that are associated with relapse, and highlight the possible importance of ion channel and G-protein coupled-receptor (GPCR) pathways in cancer development. We concluded that a two-hit genetic model accounts for about one third of SCNA indicating that mechanisms, such haploinsufficiency and epigenetic inactivation, account for the remaining SCNA losses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5628936 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56289362017-10-20 Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data Camacho, Niedzica Van Loo, Peter Edwards, Sandra Kay, Jonathan D. Matthews, Lucy Haase, Kerstin Clark, Jeremy Dennis, Nening Thomas, Sarah Kremeyer, Barbara Zamora, Jorge Butler, Adam P. Gundem, Gunes Merson, Sue Luxton, Hayley Hawkins, Steve Ghori, Mohammed Marsden, Luke Lambert, Adam Karaszi, Katalin Pelvender, Gill Massie, Charlie E. Kote-Jarai, Zsofia Raine, Keiran Jones, David Howat, William J. Hazell, Steven Livni, Naomi Fisher, Cyril Ogden, Christopher Kumar, Pardeep Thompson, Alan Nicol, David Mayer, Erik Dudderidge, Tim Yu, Yongwei Zhang, Hongwei Shah, Nimish C. Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. Isaacs, William Visakorpi, Tapio Hamdy, Freddie Berney, Dan Verrill, Clare Warren, Anne Y. Wedge, David C. Lynch, Andrew G. Foster, Christopher S. Lu, Yong Jie Bova, G. Steven Whitaker, Hayley C. McDermott, Ultan Neal, David E. Eeles, Rosalind Cooper, Colin S. Brewer, Daniel S. PLoS Genet Research Article A variety of models have been proposed to explain regions of recurrent somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) in human cancer. Our study employs Whole Genome DNA Sequence (WGS) data from tumor samples (n = 103) to comprehensively assess the role of the Knudson two hit genetic model in SCNA generation in prostate cancer. 64 recurrent regions of loss and gain were detected, of which 28 were novel, including regions of loss with more than 15% frequency at Chr4p15.2-p15.1 (15.53%), Chr6q27 (16.50%) and Chr18q12.3 (17.48%). Comprehensive mutation screens of genes, lincRNA encoding sequences, control regions and conserved domains within SCNAs demonstrated that a two-hit genetic model was supported in only a minor proportion of recurrent SCNA losses examined (15/40). We found that recurrent breakpoints and regions of inversion often occur within Knudson model SCNAs, leading to the identification of ZNF292 as a target gene for the deletion at 6q14.3-q15 and NKX3.1 as a two-hit target at 8p21.3-p21.2. The importance of alterations of lincRNA sequences was illustrated by the identification of a novel mutational hotspot at the KCCAT42, FENDRR, CAT1886 and STCAT2 loci at the 16q23.1-q24.3 loss. Our data confirm that the burden of SCNAs is predictive of biochemical recurrence, define nine individual regions that are associated with relapse, and highlight the possible importance of ion channel and G-protein coupled-receptor (GPCR) pathways in cancer development. We concluded that a two-hit genetic model accounts for about one third of SCNA indicating that mechanisms, such haploinsufficiency and epigenetic inactivation, account for the remaining SCNA losses. Public Library of Science 2017-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5628936/ /pubmed/28945760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007001 Text en © 2017 Camacho et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Camacho, Niedzica Van Loo, Peter Edwards, Sandra Kay, Jonathan D. Matthews, Lucy Haase, Kerstin Clark, Jeremy Dennis, Nening Thomas, Sarah Kremeyer, Barbara Zamora, Jorge Butler, Adam P. Gundem, Gunes Merson, Sue Luxton, Hayley Hawkins, Steve Ghori, Mohammed Marsden, Luke Lambert, Adam Karaszi, Katalin Pelvender, Gill Massie, Charlie E. Kote-Jarai, Zsofia Raine, Keiran Jones, David Howat, William J. Hazell, Steven Livni, Naomi Fisher, Cyril Ogden, Christopher Kumar, Pardeep Thompson, Alan Nicol, David Mayer, Erik Dudderidge, Tim Yu, Yongwei Zhang, Hongwei Shah, Nimish C. Gnanapragasam, Vincent J. Isaacs, William Visakorpi, Tapio Hamdy, Freddie Berney, Dan Verrill, Clare Warren, Anne Y. Wedge, David C. Lynch, Andrew G. Foster, Christopher S. Lu, Yong Jie Bova, G. Steven Whitaker, Hayley C. McDermott, Ultan Neal, David E. Eeles, Rosalind Cooper, Colin S. Brewer, Daniel S. Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data |
title | Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data |
title_full | Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data |
title_fullStr | Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data |
title_full_unstemmed | Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data |
title_short | Appraising the relevance of DNA copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome DNA sequence data |
title_sort | appraising the relevance of dna copy number loss and gain in prostate cancer using whole genome dna sequence data |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28945760 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT camachoniedzica appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT vanloopeter appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT edwardssandra appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT kayjonathand appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT matthewslucy appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT haasekerstin appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT clarkjeremy appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT dennisnening appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT thomassarah appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT kremeyerbarbara appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT zamorajorge appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT butleradamp appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT gundemgunes appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT mersonsue appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT luxtonhayley appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT hawkinssteve appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT ghorimohammed appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT marsdenluke appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT lambertadam appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT karaszikatalin appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT pelvendergill appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT massiecharliee appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT kotejaraizsofia appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT rainekeiran appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT jonesdavid appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT howatwilliamj appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT hazellsteven appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT livninaomi appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT fishercyril appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT ogdenchristopher appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT kumarpardeep appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT thompsonalan appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT nicoldavid appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT mayererik appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT dudderidgetim appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT yuyongwei appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT zhanghongwei appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT shahnimishc appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT gnanapragasamvincentj appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT isaacswilliam appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT visakorpitapio appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT hamdyfreddie appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT berneydan appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT verrillclare appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT warrenanney appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT wedgedavidc appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT lynchandrewg appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT fosterchristophers appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT luyongjie appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT bovagsteven appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT whitakerhayleyc appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT mcdermottultan appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT nealdavide appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT eelesrosalind appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT coopercolins appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata AT brewerdaniels appraisingtherelevanceofdnacopynumberlossandgaininprostatecancerusingwholegenomednasequencedata |