Cargando…

Prediction of Delayed Colonic Transit Using Bristol Stool Form and Stool Frequency in Eastern Constipated Patients: A Difference From the West

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The correlation between the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) and colonic transit time (CTT) has been reported in Western populations. Our study aims to study the relationship between BSFS, stool frequency, and CTT in Eastern patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: A total of 144...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich, Patcharatrakul, Tanisa, Gonlachanvit, Sutep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28738452
http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm17022
_version_ 1783268981257273344
author Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
Patcharatrakul, Tanisa
Gonlachanvit, Sutep
author_facet Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
Patcharatrakul, Tanisa
Gonlachanvit, Sutep
author_sort Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: The correlation between the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) and colonic transit time (CTT) has been reported in Western populations. Our study aims to study the relationship between BSFS, stool frequency, and CTT in Eastern patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: A total of 144 chronic functional constipation patients underwent colonic transit study by using radio-opaque markers, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion test. Stool diary including stool forms and frequency was recorded. Delayed CTT was defined as the retention of more than 20.0% of radio-opaque markers in the colon on day 5. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (17.4%) had delayed colonic transit. Mean 5-day BSFS (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34–0.79; P = 0.021) and stool frequency (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44–0.83; P = 0.002) were independently associated with delayed CTT by logistic regression analysis. Mean 5-day BSFS (area under the curve [AUC], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62–0.84; P < 0.001) and stool frequency (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63–0.87; P < 0.001) fairly predicted delayed CTT. The optimal mean 5-day BSFS of ≤ 3 provided 68.0% sensitivity, 69.7% specificity, and 69.4% accuracy, and the optimal stool frequency ≤ 2 bowel movements in 5 days provided 64.0% sensitivity, 83.1% specificity, and 84.0% accuracy for predicting delayed CTT. CONCLUSIONS: Both stool form and frequency were significantly associated with delayed CTT. Stool frequency ≤ 2 and BSFS 1–3 rather than BSFS 1–2 that was used in the Westerners could be used as surrogate for delayed CTT in Eastern patients with constipation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5628989
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56289892017-10-17 Prediction of Delayed Colonic Transit Using Bristol Stool Form and Stool Frequency in Eastern Constipated Patients: A Difference From the West Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich Patcharatrakul, Tanisa Gonlachanvit, Sutep J Neurogastroenterol Motil Original Article BACKGROUND/AIMS: The correlation between the Bristol stool form scale (BSFS) and colonic transit time (CTT) has been reported in Western populations. Our study aims to study the relationship between BSFS, stool frequency, and CTT in Eastern patients with chronic constipation. METHODS: A total of 144 chronic functional constipation patients underwent colonic transit study by using radio-opaque markers, anorectal manometry, and balloon expulsion test. Stool diary including stool forms and frequency was recorded. Delayed CTT was defined as the retention of more than 20.0% of radio-opaque markers in the colon on day 5. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (17.4%) had delayed colonic transit. Mean 5-day BSFS (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.34–0.79; P = 0.021) and stool frequency (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44–0.83; P = 0.002) were independently associated with delayed CTT by logistic regression analysis. Mean 5-day BSFS (area under the curve [AUC], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.62–0.84; P < 0.001) and stool frequency (AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63–0.87; P < 0.001) fairly predicted delayed CTT. The optimal mean 5-day BSFS of ≤ 3 provided 68.0% sensitivity, 69.7% specificity, and 69.4% accuracy, and the optimal stool frequency ≤ 2 bowel movements in 5 days provided 64.0% sensitivity, 83.1% specificity, and 84.0% accuracy for predicting delayed CTT. CONCLUSIONS: Both stool form and frequency were significantly associated with delayed CTT. Stool frequency ≤ 2 and BSFS 1–3 rather than BSFS 1–2 that was used in the Westerners could be used as surrogate for delayed CTT in Eastern patients with constipation. Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility 2017-10 2017-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5628989/ /pubmed/28738452 http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm17022 Text en © 2017 The Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jaruvongvanich, Veeravich
Patcharatrakul, Tanisa
Gonlachanvit, Sutep
Prediction of Delayed Colonic Transit Using Bristol Stool Form and Stool Frequency in Eastern Constipated Patients: A Difference From the West
title Prediction of Delayed Colonic Transit Using Bristol Stool Form and Stool Frequency in Eastern Constipated Patients: A Difference From the West
title_full Prediction of Delayed Colonic Transit Using Bristol Stool Form and Stool Frequency in Eastern Constipated Patients: A Difference From the West
title_fullStr Prediction of Delayed Colonic Transit Using Bristol Stool Form and Stool Frequency in Eastern Constipated Patients: A Difference From the West
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of Delayed Colonic Transit Using Bristol Stool Form and Stool Frequency in Eastern Constipated Patients: A Difference From the West
title_short Prediction of Delayed Colonic Transit Using Bristol Stool Form and Stool Frequency in Eastern Constipated Patients: A Difference From the West
title_sort prediction of delayed colonic transit using bristol stool form and stool frequency in eastern constipated patients: a difference from the west
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5628989/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28738452
http://dx.doi.org/10.5056/jnm17022
work_keys_str_mv AT jaruvongvanichveeravich predictionofdelayedcolonictransitusingbristolstoolformandstoolfrequencyineasternconstipatedpatientsadifferencefromthewest
AT patcharatrakultanisa predictionofdelayedcolonictransitusingbristolstoolformandstoolfrequencyineasternconstipatedpatientsadifferencefromthewest
AT gonlachanvitsutep predictionofdelayedcolonictransitusingbristolstoolformandstoolfrequencyineasternconstipatedpatientsadifferencefromthewest