Cargando…

P300: Waves Identification with and without Subtraction of Traces

Introduction  The P300 test requires well-defined and unique criteria, in addition to training for the examiners, for a uniform analysis of studies and to avoid variations and errors in the interpretation of measurement results. Objectives  The objective of this study is to verify whether there are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romero, Ana Carla Leite, Reis, Ana Cláudia Mirândola Barbosa, Oliveira, Anna Caroline Silva de, Oliveira Simões, Humberto de, Oliveira Junqueira, Cinthia Amorim de, Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2017
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29018497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1599096
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction  The P300 test requires well-defined and unique criteria, in addition to training for the examiners, for a uniform analysis of studies and to avoid variations and errors in the interpretation of measurement results. Objectives  The objective of this study is to verify whether there are differences in P300 with and without subtraction of traces of standard and nonstandard stimuli. Method  We conducted this study in collaboration with two research electrophysiology laboratories. From Laboratory 1, we selected 40 tests of subjects between 7–44 years, from Laboratory 2, we selected 83 tests of subjects between 18–44 years. We first performed the identification with the nonstandard stimuli; then, we subtracted the nonstandard stimuli from the standard stimuli. The examiners identified the waves, performing a descriptive and comparative analysis of traces with and without subtraction. Results  After a comparative analysis of the traces with and without subtraction, there was no significant difference when compared with analysis of traces in both laboratories, within the conditions, of right ears ( p  = 0.13 and 0.28 for differences between latency and amplitude measurements) and left ears ( p  = 0.15 and 0.09 for differences between latency and amplitude measurements) from Laboratory 1. As for Laboratory 2, when investigating both ears, results did not identify significant differences ( p  = 0.098 and 0.28 for differences between latency and amplitude measurements). Conclusion  There was no difference verified in traces with and without subtraction. We suggest the identification of this potential performed through nonstandard stimuli.