Cargando…
Do Austrian “INTEGRI (integrated care) projects” comply with international definitions and concepts?
One of the biggest challenges for European healthcare systems is the fragmentation of care. To overcome this challenge, integrated care (IC) approaches have been recently implemented. To further improve this method, current and past projects must be monitored and evaluated. However, since the defini...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0555-5 |
_version_ | 1783269018267811840 |
---|---|
author | Geiger, Isabel Wild, Claudia |
author_facet | Geiger, Isabel Wild, Claudia |
author_sort | Geiger, Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the biggest challenges for European healthcare systems is the fragmentation of care. To overcome this challenge, integrated care (IC) approaches have been recently implemented. To further improve this method, current and past projects must be monitored and evaluated. However, since the definition of IC is very indistinct and varies significantly in literature, key elements have to be defined. The study design selected was a mixed-methods study that includes two approaches: a systematic literature review and qualitative content analysis of the data provided by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute. Nine key elements of IC projects were identified in the literature review and subsequently compared with the main features coded from previous INTEGRI applications. The results showed that 41 of the applications presented seven or more criteria in their official submission form. The conclusion of the results can be drawn as a justification and validation of the INTEGRI criteria. Although the results are positive on the whole, three recommendations on possible improvements are given. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5629237 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56292372017-10-19 Do Austrian “INTEGRI (integrated care) projects” comply with international definitions and concepts? Geiger, Isabel Wild, Claudia Wien Med Wochenschr Original Article One of the biggest challenges for European healthcare systems is the fragmentation of care. To overcome this challenge, integrated care (IC) approaches have been recently implemented. To further improve this method, current and past projects must be monitored and evaluated. However, since the definition of IC is very indistinct and varies significantly in literature, key elements have to be defined. The study design selected was a mixed-methods study that includes two approaches: a systematic literature review and qualitative content analysis of the data provided by the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute. Nine key elements of IC projects were identified in the literature review and subsequently compared with the main features coded from previous INTEGRI applications. The results showed that 41 of the applications presented seven or more criteria in their official submission form. The conclusion of the results can be drawn as a justification and validation of the INTEGRI criteria. Although the results are positive on the whole, three recommendations on possible improvements are given. Springer Vienna 2017-03-20 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5629237/ /pubmed/28321520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0555-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Geiger, Isabel Wild, Claudia Do Austrian “INTEGRI (integrated care) projects” comply with international definitions and concepts? |
title | Do Austrian “INTEGRI (integrated care) projects” comply with international definitions and concepts? |
title_full | Do Austrian “INTEGRI (integrated care) projects” comply with international definitions and concepts? |
title_fullStr | Do Austrian “INTEGRI (integrated care) projects” comply with international definitions and concepts? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Austrian “INTEGRI (integrated care) projects” comply with international definitions and concepts? |
title_short | Do Austrian “INTEGRI (integrated care) projects” comply with international definitions and concepts? |
title_sort | do austrian “integri (integrated care) projects” comply with international definitions and concepts? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629237/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28321520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10354-017-0555-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geigerisabel doaustrianintegriintegratedcareprojectscomplywithinternationaldefinitionsandconcepts AT wildclaudia doaustrianintegriintegratedcareprojectscomplywithinternationaldefinitionsandconcepts |