Cargando…

Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology

OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise important research questions for miscarriage. DESIGN: A priority setting partnership using prospective surveys and consensus meetings following methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Women and those affected by miscarriage work...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prior, Matthew, Bagness, Carmel, Brewin, Jane, Coomarasamy, Arri, Easthope, Lucy, Hepworth-Jones, Barbara, Hinshaw, Kim, O'Toole, Emily, Orford, Julie, Regan, Lesley, Raine-Fenning, Nick, Shakespeare, Judy, Small, Rachel, Thornton, Jim, Metcalf, Leanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28838896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016571
_version_ 1783269096300740608
author Prior, Matthew
Bagness, Carmel
Brewin, Jane
Coomarasamy, Arri
Easthope, Lucy
Hepworth-Jones, Barbara
Hinshaw, Kim
O'Toole, Emily
Orford, Julie
Regan, Lesley
Raine-Fenning, Nick
Shakespeare, Judy
Small, Rachel
Thornton, Jim
Metcalf, Leanne
author_facet Prior, Matthew
Bagness, Carmel
Brewin, Jane
Coomarasamy, Arri
Easthope, Lucy
Hepworth-Jones, Barbara
Hinshaw, Kim
O'Toole, Emily
Orford, Julie
Regan, Lesley
Raine-Fenning, Nick
Shakespeare, Judy
Small, Rachel
Thornton, Jim
Metcalf, Leanne
author_sort Prior, Matthew
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise important research questions for miscarriage. DESIGN: A priority setting partnership using prospective surveys and consensus meetings following methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Women and those affected by miscarriage working alongside healthcare professionals. RESULTS: In the initial survey, 1093 participants (932 women who have experienced miscarriage, 8 partners, 17 family members, friends or colleagues, 104 healthcare professionals and eight charitable organisations) submitted 3279 questions. A review of existing literature identified a further 64. Non-questions were removed, and the remaining questions were categorised and summarised into 58 questions. In an interim electronic survey, 2122 respondents chose their top 10 priorities from the 58 summary questions. The 25 highest ranked in the survey were prioritised at a final face-to-face workshop. In summary, the top 10 priorities were ranked as follows: research into preventative treatment, emotional aspects in general, investigation, relevance of pre-existing medical conditions, emotional support as a treatment, importance of lifestyle factors, importance of genetic and chromosomal causes, preconception tests, investigation after different numbers of miscarriage and male causal factors. CONCLUSIONS: These results should be the focus of future miscarriage research. Presently, studies are being conducted to address the top priority; however, many other priorities, especially psychological and emotional support, are less well researched areas. We hope our results will encourage both researchers and funders to focus on these priorities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5629698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56296982017-10-11 Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology Prior, Matthew Bagness, Carmel Brewin, Jane Coomarasamy, Arri Easthope, Lucy Hepworth-Jones, Barbara Hinshaw, Kim O'Toole, Emily Orford, Julie Regan, Lesley Raine-Fenning, Nick Shakespeare, Judy Small, Rachel Thornton, Jim Metcalf, Leanne BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise important research questions for miscarriage. DESIGN: A priority setting partnership using prospective surveys and consensus meetings following methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Women and those affected by miscarriage working alongside healthcare professionals. RESULTS: In the initial survey, 1093 participants (932 women who have experienced miscarriage, 8 partners, 17 family members, friends or colleagues, 104 healthcare professionals and eight charitable organisations) submitted 3279 questions. A review of existing literature identified a further 64. Non-questions were removed, and the remaining questions were categorised and summarised into 58 questions. In an interim electronic survey, 2122 respondents chose their top 10 priorities from the 58 summary questions. The 25 highest ranked in the survey were prioritised at a final face-to-face workshop. In summary, the top 10 priorities were ranked as follows: research into preventative treatment, emotional aspects in general, investigation, relevance of pre-existing medical conditions, emotional support as a treatment, importance of lifestyle factors, importance of genetic and chromosomal causes, preconception tests, investigation after different numbers of miscarriage and male causal factors. CONCLUSIONS: These results should be the focus of future miscarriage research. Presently, studies are being conducted to address the top priority; however, many other priorities, especially psychological and emotional support, are less well researched areas. We hope our results will encourage both researchers and funders to focus on these priorities. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5629698/ /pubmed/28838896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016571 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Prior, Matthew
Bagness, Carmel
Brewin, Jane
Coomarasamy, Arri
Easthope, Lucy
Hepworth-Jones, Barbara
Hinshaw, Kim
O'Toole, Emily
Orford, Julie
Regan, Lesley
Raine-Fenning, Nick
Shakespeare, Judy
Small, Rachel
Thornton, Jim
Metcalf, Leanne
Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology
title Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology
title_full Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology
title_fullStr Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology
title_full_unstemmed Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology
title_short Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology
title_sort priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the james lind alliance methodology
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28838896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016571
work_keys_str_mv AT priormatthew prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT bagnesscarmel prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT brewinjane prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT coomarasamyarri prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT easthopelucy prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT hepworthjonesbarbara prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT hinshawkim prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT otooleemily prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT orfordjulie prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT reganlesley prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT rainefenningnick prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT shakespearejudy prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT smallrachel prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT thorntonjim prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology
AT metcalfleanne prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology