Cargando…
Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology
OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise important research questions for miscarriage. DESIGN: A priority setting partnership using prospective surveys and consensus meetings following methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Women and those affected by miscarriage work...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28838896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016571 |
_version_ | 1783269096300740608 |
---|---|
author | Prior, Matthew Bagness, Carmel Brewin, Jane Coomarasamy, Arri Easthope, Lucy Hepworth-Jones, Barbara Hinshaw, Kim O'Toole, Emily Orford, Julie Regan, Lesley Raine-Fenning, Nick Shakespeare, Judy Small, Rachel Thornton, Jim Metcalf, Leanne |
author_facet | Prior, Matthew Bagness, Carmel Brewin, Jane Coomarasamy, Arri Easthope, Lucy Hepworth-Jones, Barbara Hinshaw, Kim O'Toole, Emily Orford, Julie Regan, Lesley Raine-Fenning, Nick Shakespeare, Judy Small, Rachel Thornton, Jim Metcalf, Leanne |
author_sort | Prior, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise important research questions for miscarriage. DESIGN: A priority setting partnership using prospective surveys and consensus meetings following methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Women and those affected by miscarriage working alongside healthcare professionals. RESULTS: In the initial survey, 1093 participants (932 women who have experienced miscarriage, 8 partners, 17 family members, friends or colleagues, 104 healthcare professionals and eight charitable organisations) submitted 3279 questions. A review of existing literature identified a further 64. Non-questions were removed, and the remaining questions were categorised and summarised into 58 questions. In an interim electronic survey, 2122 respondents chose their top 10 priorities from the 58 summary questions. The 25 highest ranked in the survey were prioritised at a final face-to-face workshop. In summary, the top 10 priorities were ranked as follows: research into preventative treatment, emotional aspects in general, investigation, relevance of pre-existing medical conditions, emotional support as a treatment, importance of lifestyle factors, importance of genetic and chromosomal causes, preconception tests, investigation after different numbers of miscarriage and male causal factors. CONCLUSIONS: These results should be the focus of future miscarriage research. Presently, studies are being conducted to address the top priority; however, many other priorities, especially psychological and emotional support, are less well researched areas. We hope our results will encourage both researchers and funders to focus on these priorities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5629698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56296982017-10-11 Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology Prior, Matthew Bagness, Carmel Brewin, Jane Coomarasamy, Arri Easthope, Lucy Hepworth-Jones, Barbara Hinshaw, Kim O'Toole, Emily Orford, Julie Regan, Lesley Raine-Fenning, Nick Shakespeare, Judy Small, Rachel Thornton, Jim Metcalf, Leanne BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To identify and prioritise important research questions for miscarriage. DESIGN: A priority setting partnership using prospective surveys and consensus meetings following methods advocated by the James Lind Alliance. SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Women and those affected by miscarriage working alongside healthcare professionals. RESULTS: In the initial survey, 1093 participants (932 women who have experienced miscarriage, 8 partners, 17 family members, friends or colleagues, 104 healthcare professionals and eight charitable organisations) submitted 3279 questions. A review of existing literature identified a further 64. Non-questions were removed, and the remaining questions were categorised and summarised into 58 questions. In an interim electronic survey, 2122 respondents chose their top 10 priorities from the 58 summary questions. The 25 highest ranked in the survey were prioritised at a final face-to-face workshop. In summary, the top 10 priorities were ranked as follows: research into preventative treatment, emotional aspects in general, investigation, relevance of pre-existing medical conditions, emotional support as a treatment, importance of lifestyle factors, importance of genetic and chromosomal causes, preconception tests, investigation after different numbers of miscarriage and male causal factors. CONCLUSIONS: These results should be the focus of future miscarriage research. Presently, studies are being conducted to address the top priority; however, many other priorities, especially psychological and emotional support, are less well researched areas. We hope our results will encourage both researchers and funders to focus on these priorities. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5629698/ /pubmed/28838896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016571 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Prior, Matthew Bagness, Carmel Brewin, Jane Coomarasamy, Arri Easthope, Lucy Hepworth-Jones, Barbara Hinshaw, Kim O'Toole, Emily Orford, Julie Regan, Lesley Raine-Fenning, Nick Shakespeare, Judy Small, Rachel Thornton, Jim Metcalf, Leanne Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology |
title | Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology |
title_full | Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology |
title_fullStr | Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology |
title_short | Priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the James Lind Alliance methodology |
title_sort | priorities for research in miscarriage: a priority setting partnership between people affected by miscarriage and professionals following the james lind alliance methodology |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28838896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT priormatthew prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT bagnesscarmel prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT brewinjane prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT coomarasamyarri prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT easthopelucy prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT hepworthjonesbarbara prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT hinshawkim prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT otooleemily prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT orfordjulie prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT reganlesley prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT rainefenningnick prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT shakespearejudy prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT smallrachel prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT thorntonjim prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology AT metcalfleanne prioritiesforresearchinmiscarriageaprioritysettingpartnershipbetweenpeopleaffectedbymiscarriageandprofessionalsfollowingthejameslindalliancemethodology |