Cargando…

A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: Previous literature confirms that a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may result in long-term emotional impacts and, in vulnerable subgroups, cognitive deficits. The accurate diagnosis of mTBI and its written documentation is an important first step towards providing appropriate and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pozzato, Ilaria, Cameron, Ian D, Meares, Susanne, Kifley, Annette, Vu, Kim Van, Liang, Anthony, Gillett, Mark, Craig, Ashley, Gopinath, Bamini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28780552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016222
_version_ 1783269106802229248
author Pozzato, Ilaria
Cameron, Ian D
Meares, Susanne
Kifley, Annette
Vu, Kim Van
Liang, Anthony
Gillett, Mark
Craig, Ashley
Gopinath, Bamini
author_facet Pozzato, Ilaria
Cameron, Ian D
Meares, Susanne
Kifley, Annette
Vu, Kim Van
Liang, Anthony
Gillett, Mark
Craig, Ashley
Gopinath, Bamini
author_sort Pozzato, Ilaria
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Previous literature confirms that a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may result in long-term emotional impacts and, in vulnerable subgroups, cognitive deficits. The accurate diagnosis of mTBI and its written documentation is an important first step towards providing appropriate and timely clinical care. Surveillance studies involving emergency department (ED) and hospital-based data need to be prioritised as these provide incident mTBI estimates. This project will advance existing research findings by estimating the occurrence of mTBI among those attending an ED and quantifying the accuracy of mTBI diagnoses recorded by ED staff through a comprehensive audit of ED records. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective chart reviews (between June 2015 and June 2016) of electronic clinical records from an ED in Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) will be conducted. The study population will include persons aged 18–65 years who attended the ED with any clinical features potentially indicative of mTBI. The WHO operational criteria for the clinical identification of mTBI cases is the presence of: (1) a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13–15 after 30 min postinjury or on presentation to hospital; (2) one or more of the following: post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) of less than 24 hours’ duration, confusion or disorientation, a witnessed loss of consciousness for ≤30 min and/or a positive CT brain scan. We estimate that 30 000 ED attendances will be screened and that a sample size of 500 cases with mTBI will be identified during this 1-year period, which will provide reliable estimates of mTBI occurrence in the ED setting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Ethics Committee. The committee deemed this study as low risk in terms of ethical issues. The written papers from this study will be submitted for publication in quality peer-reviewed medical and health journals. Study findings will be disseminated via presentations at national/international conferences and peer-reviewed journals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5629740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56297402017-10-11 A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study Pozzato, Ilaria Cameron, Ian D Meares, Susanne Kifley, Annette Vu, Kim Van Liang, Anthony Gillett, Mark Craig, Ashley Gopinath, Bamini BMJ Open Epidemiology INTRODUCTION: Previous literature confirms that a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may result in long-term emotional impacts and, in vulnerable subgroups, cognitive deficits. The accurate diagnosis of mTBI and its written documentation is an important first step towards providing appropriate and timely clinical care. Surveillance studies involving emergency department (ED) and hospital-based data need to be prioritised as these provide incident mTBI estimates. This project will advance existing research findings by estimating the occurrence of mTBI among those attending an ED and quantifying the accuracy of mTBI diagnoses recorded by ED staff through a comprehensive audit of ED records. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Retrospective chart reviews (between June 2015 and June 2016) of electronic clinical records from an ED in Sydney (New South Wales, Australia) will be conducted. The study population will include persons aged 18–65 years who attended the ED with any clinical features potentially indicative of mTBI. The WHO operational criteria for the clinical identification of mTBI cases is the presence of: (1) a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13–15 after 30 min postinjury or on presentation to hospital; (2) one or more of the following: post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) of less than 24 hours’ duration, confusion or disorientation, a witnessed loss of consciousness for ≤30 min and/or a positive CT brain scan. We estimate that 30 000 ED attendances will be screened and that a sample size of 500 cases with mTBI will be identified during this 1-year period, which will provide reliable estimates of mTBI occurrence in the ED setting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Northern Sydney Local Health District Ethics Committee. The committee deemed this study as low risk in terms of ethical issues. The written papers from this study will be submitted for publication in quality peer-reviewed medical and health journals. Study findings will be disseminated via presentations at national/international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5629740/ /pubmed/28780552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016222 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Pozzato, Ilaria
Cameron, Ian D
Meares, Susanne
Kifley, Annette
Vu, Kim Van
Liang, Anthony
Gillett, Mark
Craig, Ashley
Gopinath, Bamini
A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study
title A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study
title_full A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study
title_short A surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study
title_sort surveillance study to determine the accuracy of mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis in an emergency department: protocol for a retrospective cohort study
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28780552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016222
work_keys_str_mv AT pozzatoilaria asurveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cameroniand asurveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mearessusanne asurveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kifleyannette asurveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vukimvan asurveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lianganthony asurveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gillettmark asurveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT craigashley asurveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gopinathbamini asurveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT pozzatoilaria surveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT cameroniand surveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mearessusanne surveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kifleyannette surveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT vukimvan surveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT lianganthony surveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gillettmark surveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT craigashley surveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gopinathbamini surveillancestudytodeterminetheaccuracyofmildtraumaticbraininjurydiagnosisinanemergencydepartmentprotocolforaretrospectivecohortstudy