Cargando…

Distribution of PLGA-modified nanoparticles in 3D cell culture models of hypo-vascularized tumor tissue

BACKGROUND: Advanced stage cancer treatments are often invasive and painful—typically comprised of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation treatment. Low transport efficiency during systemic chemotherapy may require high chemotherapeutic doses to effectively target cancerous tissue, resulting in sys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sims, Lee B., Huss, Maya K., Frieboes, Hermann B., Steinbach-Rankins, Jill M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28982361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0298-x
_version_ 1783269109216051200
author Sims, Lee B.
Huss, Maya K.
Frieboes, Hermann B.
Steinbach-Rankins, Jill M.
author_facet Sims, Lee B.
Huss, Maya K.
Frieboes, Hermann B.
Steinbach-Rankins, Jill M.
author_sort Sims, Lee B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advanced stage cancer treatments are often invasive and painful—typically comprised of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation treatment. Low transport efficiency during systemic chemotherapy may require high chemotherapeutic doses to effectively target cancerous tissue, resulting in systemic toxicity. Nanotherapeutic platforms have been proposed as an alternative to more safely and effectively deliver therapeutic agents directly to tumor sites. However, cellular internalization and tumor penetration are often diametrically opposed, with limited access to tumor regions distal from vasculature, due to irregular tissue morphologies. To address these transport challenges, nanoparticles (NPs) are often surface-modified with ligands to enhance transport and longevity after localized or systemic administration. Here, we evaluate stealth polyethylene–glycol (PEG), cell-penetrating (MPG), and CPP-stealth (MPG/PEG) poly(lactic-co-glycolic-acid) (PLGA) NP co-treatment strategies in 3D cell culture representing hypo-vascularized tissue. RESULTS: Smaller, more regularly-shaped avascular tissue was generated using the hanging drop (HD) method, while more irregularly-shaped masses were formed with the liquid overlay (LO) technique. To compare NP distribution differences within the same type of tissue as a function of different cancer types, we selected HeLa, cervical epithelial adenocarcinoma cells; CaSki, cervical epidermoid carcinoma cells; and SiHa, grade II cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells. In HD tumors, enhanced distribution relative to unmodified NPs was measured for MPG and PEG NPs in HeLa, and for all modified NPs in SiHa spheroids. In LO tumors, the greatest distribution was observed for MPG and MPG/PEG NPs in HeLa, and for PEG and MPG/PEG NPs in SiHa spheroids. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-clinical evaluation of PLGA-modified NP distribution into hypo-vascularized tumor tissue may benefit from considering tissue morphology in addition to cancer type. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12951-017-0298-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5629750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56297502017-10-13 Distribution of PLGA-modified nanoparticles in 3D cell culture models of hypo-vascularized tumor tissue Sims, Lee B. Huss, Maya K. Frieboes, Hermann B. Steinbach-Rankins, Jill M. J Nanobiotechnology Research BACKGROUND: Advanced stage cancer treatments are often invasive and painful—typically comprised of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation treatment. Low transport efficiency during systemic chemotherapy may require high chemotherapeutic doses to effectively target cancerous tissue, resulting in systemic toxicity. Nanotherapeutic platforms have been proposed as an alternative to more safely and effectively deliver therapeutic agents directly to tumor sites. However, cellular internalization and tumor penetration are often diametrically opposed, with limited access to tumor regions distal from vasculature, due to irregular tissue morphologies. To address these transport challenges, nanoparticles (NPs) are often surface-modified with ligands to enhance transport and longevity after localized or systemic administration. Here, we evaluate stealth polyethylene–glycol (PEG), cell-penetrating (MPG), and CPP-stealth (MPG/PEG) poly(lactic-co-glycolic-acid) (PLGA) NP co-treatment strategies in 3D cell culture representing hypo-vascularized tissue. RESULTS: Smaller, more regularly-shaped avascular tissue was generated using the hanging drop (HD) method, while more irregularly-shaped masses were formed with the liquid overlay (LO) technique. To compare NP distribution differences within the same type of tissue as a function of different cancer types, we selected HeLa, cervical epithelial adenocarcinoma cells; CaSki, cervical epidermoid carcinoma cells; and SiHa, grade II cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells. In HD tumors, enhanced distribution relative to unmodified NPs was measured for MPG and PEG NPs in HeLa, and for all modified NPs in SiHa spheroids. In LO tumors, the greatest distribution was observed for MPG and MPG/PEG NPs in HeLa, and for PEG and MPG/PEG NPs in SiHa spheroids. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-clinical evaluation of PLGA-modified NP distribution into hypo-vascularized tumor tissue may benefit from considering tissue morphology in addition to cancer type. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12951-017-0298-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5629750/ /pubmed/28982361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0298-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sims, Lee B.
Huss, Maya K.
Frieboes, Hermann B.
Steinbach-Rankins, Jill M.
Distribution of PLGA-modified nanoparticles in 3D cell culture models of hypo-vascularized tumor tissue
title Distribution of PLGA-modified nanoparticles in 3D cell culture models of hypo-vascularized tumor tissue
title_full Distribution of PLGA-modified nanoparticles in 3D cell culture models of hypo-vascularized tumor tissue
title_fullStr Distribution of PLGA-modified nanoparticles in 3D cell culture models of hypo-vascularized tumor tissue
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of PLGA-modified nanoparticles in 3D cell culture models of hypo-vascularized tumor tissue
title_short Distribution of PLGA-modified nanoparticles in 3D cell culture models of hypo-vascularized tumor tissue
title_sort distribution of plga-modified nanoparticles in 3d cell culture models of hypo-vascularized tumor tissue
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28982361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0298-x
work_keys_str_mv AT simsleeb distributionofplgamodifiednanoparticlesin3dcellculturemodelsofhypovascularizedtumortissue
AT hussmayak distributionofplgamodifiednanoparticlesin3dcellculturemodelsofhypovascularizedtumortissue
AT frieboeshermannb distributionofplgamodifiednanoparticlesin3dcellculturemodelsofhypovascularizedtumortissue
AT steinbachrankinsjillm distributionofplgamodifiednanoparticlesin3dcellculturemodelsofhypovascularizedtumortissue