Cargando…

Potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli

Knowledge about interactions between reward and negative processing is rudimentary. Here, we employed functional MRI to probe how potential reward signaled by advance cues alters aversive distractor processing during perception. Behaviorally, the influence of aversive stimuli on task performance was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padmala, Srikanth, Sirbu, Mihai, Pessoa, Luiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28505380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx067
_version_ 1783269125205786624
author Padmala, Srikanth
Sirbu, Mihai
Pessoa, Luiz
author_facet Padmala, Srikanth
Sirbu, Mihai
Pessoa, Luiz
author_sort Padmala, Srikanth
collection PubMed
description Knowledge about interactions between reward and negative processing is rudimentary. Here, we employed functional MRI to probe how potential reward signaled by advance cues alters aversive distractor processing during perception. Behaviorally, the influence of aversive stimuli on task performance was reduced during the reward compared to no-reward condition. In the brain, at the task phase, paralleling the observed behavioral pattern, we observed significant interactions in the anterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, such that responses during the negative (vs neutral) condition were reduced during the reward compared to no-reward condition. Notably, negative distractor processing in the amygdala appeared to be independent of the reward manipulation. During the initial cue phase, we observed increased reward-related responses in the ventral striatum/accumbens, which were correlated with behavioral interference scores at the subsequent task phase, revealing that participants with increased reward-related responses exhibited a greater behavioral benefit of reward in reducing the adverse effect of negative images. Furthermore, during processing of reward (vs no-reward) cues, the ventral striatum exhibited stronger functional connectivity with fronto-parietal regions important for attentional control. Together, our findings contribute to the understanding of how potential reward influences attentional control and reduces negative distractor processing in the human brain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5629819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56298192017-10-12 Potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli Padmala, Srikanth Sirbu, Mihai Pessoa, Luiz Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles Knowledge about interactions between reward and negative processing is rudimentary. Here, we employed functional MRI to probe how potential reward signaled by advance cues alters aversive distractor processing during perception. Behaviorally, the influence of aversive stimuli on task performance was reduced during the reward compared to no-reward condition. In the brain, at the task phase, paralleling the observed behavioral pattern, we observed significant interactions in the anterior insula and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, such that responses during the negative (vs neutral) condition were reduced during the reward compared to no-reward condition. Notably, negative distractor processing in the amygdala appeared to be independent of the reward manipulation. During the initial cue phase, we observed increased reward-related responses in the ventral striatum/accumbens, which were correlated with behavioral interference scores at the subsequent task phase, revealing that participants with increased reward-related responses exhibited a greater behavioral benefit of reward in reducing the adverse effect of negative images. Furthermore, during processing of reward (vs no-reward) cues, the ventral striatum exhibited stronger functional connectivity with fronto-parietal regions important for attentional control. Together, our findings contribute to the understanding of how potential reward influences attentional control and reduces negative distractor processing in the human brain. Oxford University Press 2017-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5629819/ /pubmed/28505380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx067 Text en © The Author(s) (2017). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Padmala, Srikanth
Sirbu, Mihai
Pessoa, Luiz
Potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli
title Potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli
title_full Potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli
title_fullStr Potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli
title_short Potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli
title_sort potential reward reduces the adverse impact of negative distractor stimuli
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28505380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx067
work_keys_str_mv AT padmalasrikanth potentialrewardreducestheadverseimpactofnegativedistractorstimuli
AT sirbumihai potentialrewardreducestheadverseimpactofnegativedistractorstimuli
AT pessoaluiz potentialrewardreducestheadverseimpactofnegativedistractorstimuli