Cargando…

Comparison Between Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Different Concentrations of Cyperus rotundus Extract: An In vitro Study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Modern methods of caries prevention concentrated on natural ingredients usage such as probiotics and polyphenols that are safer for young children with Streptococcus mutans inhibitory properties. The purpose of this study was to compare antibacterial effects of different concent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haghgoo, Roza, Mehran, Majid, Zadeh, Hamideh Farajian, Afshari, Elaheh, Zadeh, Nafiseh Farajian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026695
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_157_17
_version_ 1783269132724076544
author Haghgoo, Roza
Mehran, Majid
Zadeh, Hamideh Farajian
Afshari, Elaheh
Zadeh, Nafiseh Farajian
author_facet Haghgoo, Roza
Mehran, Majid
Zadeh, Hamideh Farajian
Afshari, Elaheh
Zadeh, Nafiseh Farajian
author_sort Haghgoo, Roza
collection PubMed
description AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Modern methods of caries prevention concentrated on natural ingredients usage such as probiotics and polyphenols that are safer for young children with Streptococcus mutans inhibitory properties. The purpose of this study was to compare antibacterial effects of different concentration of Cyperus rotundus extract and chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.2% mouthwash on S. mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the antibacterial effectiveness of the C. rotundus extract and CHX was compared with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test in tube, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) test in solid medium, and disc diffusion for measurement of inhibition zone. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, one sample t-test, and independent sample t-test statistical methods by SPSS. 24 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). RESULTS: MIC and MBC values of the C. rotundus extract were obtained 225 and 450 mg/ml, respectively, for S. mutans and 108 and 225 mg/ml for L. acidophilus, which are more than CHX (0.5, 1 res.). The inhibition zone increased in a dose-dependent manner but lower than CHX. CONCLUSION: The C. rotundus extract had antibacterial effects (bactericide and bacteriostatic) on S. mutans and L. acidophillus. Although this effect was lower than CHX. With regard to adverse effect of CHX, this extract can be a potential antibacterial agent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5629851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56298512017-10-12 Comparison Between Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Different Concentrations of Cyperus rotundus Extract: An In vitro Study Haghgoo, Roza Mehran, Majid Zadeh, Hamideh Farajian Afshari, Elaheh Zadeh, Nafiseh Farajian J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Modern methods of caries prevention concentrated on natural ingredients usage such as probiotics and polyphenols that are safer for young children with Streptococcus mutans inhibitory properties. The purpose of this study was to compare antibacterial effects of different concentration of Cyperus rotundus extract and chlorhexidine (CHX) 0.2% mouthwash on S. mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this in vitro study, the antibacterial effectiveness of the C. rotundus extract and CHX was compared with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test in tube, minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) test in solid medium, and disc diffusion for measurement of inhibition zone. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, one sample t-test, and independent sample t-test statistical methods by SPSS. 24 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). RESULTS: MIC and MBC values of the C. rotundus extract were obtained 225 and 450 mg/ml, respectively, for S. mutans and 108 and 225 mg/ml for L. acidophilus, which are more than CHX (0.5, 1 res.). The inhibition zone increased in a dose-dependent manner but lower than CHX. CONCLUSION: The C. rotundus extract had antibacterial effects (bactericide and bacteriostatic) on S. mutans and L. acidophillus. Although this effect was lower than CHX. With regard to adverse effect of CHX, this extract can be a potential antibacterial agent. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 2017-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5629851/ /pubmed/29026695 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_157_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Haghgoo, Roza
Mehran, Majid
Zadeh, Hamideh Farajian
Afshari, Elaheh
Zadeh, Nafiseh Farajian
Comparison Between Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Different Concentrations of Cyperus rotundus Extract: An In vitro Study
title Comparison Between Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Different Concentrations of Cyperus rotundus Extract: An In vitro Study
title_full Comparison Between Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Different Concentrations of Cyperus rotundus Extract: An In vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparison Between Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Different Concentrations of Cyperus rotundus Extract: An In vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Different Concentrations of Cyperus rotundus Extract: An In vitro Study
title_short Comparison Between Antibacterial Effect of Chlorhexidine 0.2% and Different Concentrations of Cyperus rotundus Extract: An In vitro Study
title_sort comparison between antibacterial effect of chlorhexidine 0.2% and different concentrations of cyperus rotundus extract: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29026695
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_157_17
work_keys_str_mv AT haghgooroza comparisonbetweenantibacterialeffectofchlorhexidine02anddifferentconcentrationsofcyperusrotundusextractaninvitrostudy
AT mehranmajid comparisonbetweenantibacterialeffectofchlorhexidine02anddifferentconcentrationsofcyperusrotundusextractaninvitrostudy
AT zadehhamidehfarajian comparisonbetweenantibacterialeffectofchlorhexidine02anddifferentconcentrationsofcyperusrotundusextractaninvitrostudy
AT afsharielaheh comparisonbetweenantibacterialeffectofchlorhexidine02anddifferentconcentrationsofcyperusrotundusextractaninvitrostudy
AT zadehnafisehfarajian comparisonbetweenantibacterialeffectofchlorhexidine02anddifferentconcentrationsofcyperusrotundusextractaninvitrostudy