Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study

OBJECTIVES: ABP 501 is a Food and Drug Administration-approved biosimilar to adalimumab; structural, functional and pharmacokinetic evaluations have shown that the two are highly similar. We report results from a phase III study comparing efficacy, safety and immunogenicity between ABP 501 and adali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cohen, Stanley, Genovese, Mark C, Choy, Ernest, Perez-Ruiz, Fernando, Matsumoto, Alan, Pavelka, Karel, Pablos, Jose L, Rizzo, Warren, Hrycaj, Pawel, Zhang, Nan, Shergy, William, Kaur, Primal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210459
_version_ 1783269150897995776
author Cohen, Stanley
Genovese, Mark C
Choy, Ernest
Perez-Ruiz, Fernando
Matsumoto, Alan
Pavelka, Karel
Pablos, Jose L
Rizzo, Warren
Hrycaj, Pawel
Zhang, Nan
Shergy, William
Kaur, Primal
author_facet Cohen, Stanley
Genovese, Mark C
Choy, Ernest
Perez-Ruiz, Fernando
Matsumoto, Alan
Pavelka, Karel
Pablos, Jose L
Rizzo, Warren
Hrycaj, Pawel
Zhang, Nan
Shergy, William
Kaur, Primal
author_sort Cohen, Stanley
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: ABP 501 is a Food and Drug Administration-approved biosimilar to adalimumab; structural, functional and pharmacokinetic evaluations have shown that the two are highly similar. We report results from a phase III study comparing efficacy, safety and immunogenicity between ABP 501 and adalimumab. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, active comparator-controlled, 26-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate were randomised (1:1) to ABP 501 or adalimumab (40 mg) every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was risk ratio (RR) of ACR20 between groups at week 24. Primary hypothesis that the treatments were equivalent would be confirmed if the 90% CI for RR of ACR20 at week 24 fell between 0.738 and 1.355, demonstrating that ABP 501 is similar to adalimumab. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count-C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP). Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory evaluations. Antidrug antibodies were assessed to determine immunogenicity. RESULTS: A total of 526 patients were randomised (n=264, ABP 501; n=262 adalimumab) and 494 completed the study. ACR20 response at week 24 was 74.6% (ABP 501) and 72.4% (adalimumab). At week 24, the RR of ACR20 (90% CI) between groups was 1.039 (0.954, 1.133), confirming the primary hypothesis. Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP, ACR50 and ACR70 were similar. There were no clinically meaningful differences in AEs and laboratory abnormalities. A total of 38.3% (ABP 501) and 38.2% (adalimumab) of patients tested positive for binding antidrug antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study demonstrate that ABP 501 is similar to adalimumab in clinical efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with moderate to severe RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01970475; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5629940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56299402017-10-11 Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study Cohen, Stanley Genovese, Mark C Choy, Ernest Perez-Ruiz, Fernando Matsumoto, Alan Pavelka, Karel Pablos, Jose L Rizzo, Warren Hrycaj, Pawel Zhang, Nan Shergy, William Kaur, Primal Ann Rheum Dis Clinical and Epidemiological Research OBJECTIVES: ABP 501 is a Food and Drug Administration-approved biosimilar to adalimumab; structural, functional and pharmacokinetic evaluations have shown that the two are highly similar. We report results from a phase III study comparing efficacy, safety and immunogenicity between ABP 501 and adalimumab. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, active comparator-controlled, 26-week equivalence study, patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate were randomised (1:1) to ABP 501 or adalimumab (40 mg) every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was risk ratio (RR) of ACR20 between groups at week 24. Primary hypothesis that the treatments were equivalent would be confirmed if the 90% CI for RR of ACR20 at week 24 fell between 0.738 and 1.355, demonstrating that ABP 501 is similar to adalimumab. Secondary endpoints included Disease Activity Score 28-joint count-C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP). Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory evaluations. Antidrug antibodies were assessed to determine immunogenicity. RESULTS: A total of 526 patients were randomised (n=264, ABP 501; n=262 adalimumab) and 494 completed the study. ACR20 response at week 24 was 74.6% (ABP 501) and 72.4% (adalimumab). At week 24, the RR of ACR20 (90% CI) between groups was 1.039 (0.954, 1.133), confirming the primary hypothesis. Changes from baseline in DAS28-CRP, ACR50 and ACR70 were similar. There were no clinically meaningful differences in AEs and laboratory abnormalities. A total of 38.3% (ABP 501) and 38.2% (adalimumab) of patients tested positive for binding antidrug antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study demonstrate that ABP 501 is similar to adalimumab in clinical efficacy, safety and immunogenicity in patients with moderate to severe RA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01970475; Results. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 2017-10 2017-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5629940/ /pubmed/28584187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210459 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical and Epidemiological Research
Cohen, Stanley
Genovese, Mark C
Choy, Ernest
Perez-Ruiz, Fernando
Matsumoto, Alan
Pavelka, Karel
Pablos, Jose L
Rizzo, Warren
Hrycaj, Pawel
Zhang, Nan
Shergy, William
Kaur, Primal
Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study
title Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study
title_full Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study
title_short Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ABP 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase III equivalence study
title_sort efficacy and safety of the biosimilar abp 501 compared with adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase iii equivalence study
topic Clinical and Epidemiological Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5629940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210459
work_keys_str_mv AT cohenstanley efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT genovesemarkc efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT choyernest efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT perezruizfernando efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT matsumotoalan efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT pavelkakarel efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT pablosjosel efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT rizzowarren efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT hrycajpawel efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT zhangnan efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT shergywilliam efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy
AT kaurprimal efficacyandsafetyofthebiosimilarabp501comparedwithadalimumabinpatientswithmoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisarandomiseddoubleblindphaseiiiequivalencestudy