Cargando…

Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the difference of T1 relaxation time on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and cavernous hemangioma of liver (CHL), and to quantitatively evaluate the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in these three focal liver lesions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Zhenpeng, Li, Chang, Chan, Tao, Cai, Huasong, Luo, Yanji, Dong, Zhi, Li, Zi-Ping, Feng, Shi-Ting
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29029443
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18918
_version_ 1783269204190822400
author Peng, Zhenpeng
Li, Chang
Chan, Tao
Cai, Huasong
Luo, Yanji
Dong, Zhi
Li, Zi-Ping
Feng, Shi-Ting
author_facet Peng, Zhenpeng
Li, Chang
Chan, Tao
Cai, Huasong
Luo, Yanji
Dong, Zhi
Li, Zi-Ping
Feng, Shi-Ting
author_sort Peng, Zhenpeng
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the difference of T1 relaxation time on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and cavernous hemangioma of liver (CHL), and to quantitatively evaluate the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in these three focal liver lesions (FLLs). RESULTS: The T1(P) of CHL was significantly higher than those of HCC and FNH (P < 0.05). Reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary phase could be observed in all three types of lesions. There were significant differences of T1(P), T1(E), T1(D) and T1(D)% between FNH, CHL and HCC (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that T1(D)% was the best indicator for diagnostic differentiation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.702. Discriminant analysis using three variables (T1(P), T1(E), and T1(D)%) showed that the classification accuracy was 88.2%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 patients diagnosed with focal liver lesions underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI including T1 mapping were enrolled, consisting of 51 HCCs, 10 FNHs, and 13 CHLs. T1 relaxation times of these lesions were measured on pre-contrast (T1(P)) and on hepatobiliary phase images at 20 minute after contrast (T1(E)). The reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary (T1(D)) and the percentage reduction (T1(D)%) was calculated. The differences of T1(P), T1(E), T1(D) and T1(D)% in these FLLs were analyzed. The usefulness of these parameters for classification of FLLs was evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA is different between in HCC, FNH and CHL. These three lesions can be distinguished using T1 mapping.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5630343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-56303432017-10-12 Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma Peng, Zhenpeng Li, Chang Chan, Tao Cai, Huasong Luo, Yanji Dong, Zhi Li, Zi-Ping Feng, Shi-Ting Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVES: To investigate the difference of T1 relaxation time on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and cavernous hemangioma of liver (CHL), and to quantitatively evaluate the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in these three focal liver lesions (FLLs). RESULTS: The T1(P) of CHL was significantly higher than those of HCC and FNH (P < 0.05). Reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary phase could be observed in all three types of lesions. There were significant differences of T1(P), T1(E), T1(D) and T1(D)% between FNH, CHL and HCC (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that T1(D)% was the best indicator for diagnostic differentiation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.702. Discriminant analysis using three variables (T1(P), T1(E), and T1(D)%) showed that the classification accuracy was 88.2%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 patients diagnosed with focal liver lesions underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI including T1 mapping were enrolled, consisting of 51 HCCs, 10 FNHs, and 13 CHLs. T1 relaxation times of these lesions were measured on pre-contrast (T1(P)) and on hepatobiliary phase images at 20 minute after contrast (T1(E)). The reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary (T1(D)) and the percentage reduction (T1(D)%) was calculated. The differences of T1(P), T1(E), T1(D) and T1(D)% in these FLLs were analyzed. The usefulness of these parameters for classification of FLLs was evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA is different between in HCC, FNH and CHL. These three lesions can be distinguished using T1 mapping. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5630343/ /pubmed/29029443 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18918 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Peng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Peng, Zhenpeng
Li, Chang
Chan, Tao
Cai, Huasong
Luo, Yanji
Dong, Zhi
Li, Zi-Ping
Feng, Shi-Ting
Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma
title Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma
title_full Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma
title_fullStr Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma
title_short Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma
title_sort quantitative evaluation of gd-eob-dtpa uptake in focal liver lesions by using t1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29029443
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18918
work_keys_str_mv AT pengzhenpeng quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma
AT lichang quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma
AT chantao quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma
AT caihuasong quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma
AT luoyanji quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma
AT dongzhi quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma
AT liziping quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma
AT fengshiting quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma