Cargando…
Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the difference of T1 relaxation time on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and cavernous hemangioma of liver (CHL), and to quantitatively evaluate the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in these three focal liver lesions...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29029443 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18918 |
_version_ | 1783269204190822400 |
---|---|
author | Peng, Zhenpeng Li, Chang Chan, Tao Cai, Huasong Luo, Yanji Dong, Zhi Li, Zi-Ping Feng, Shi-Ting |
author_facet | Peng, Zhenpeng Li, Chang Chan, Tao Cai, Huasong Luo, Yanji Dong, Zhi Li, Zi-Ping Feng, Shi-Ting |
author_sort | Peng, Zhenpeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the difference of T1 relaxation time on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and cavernous hemangioma of liver (CHL), and to quantitatively evaluate the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in these three focal liver lesions (FLLs). RESULTS: The T1(P) of CHL was significantly higher than those of HCC and FNH (P < 0.05). Reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary phase could be observed in all three types of lesions. There were significant differences of T1(P), T1(E), T1(D) and T1(D)% between FNH, CHL and HCC (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that T1(D)% was the best indicator for diagnostic differentiation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.702. Discriminant analysis using three variables (T1(P), T1(E), and T1(D)%) showed that the classification accuracy was 88.2%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 patients diagnosed with focal liver lesions underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI including T1 mapping were enrolled, consisting of 51 HCCs, 10 FNHs, and 13 CHLs. T1 relaxation times of these lesions were measured on pre-contrast (T1(P)) and on hepatobiliary phase images at 20 minute after contrast (T1(E)). The reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary (T1(D)) and the percentage reduction (T1(D)%) was calculated. The differences of T1(P), T1(E), T1(D) and T1(D)% in these FLLs were analyzed. The usefulness of these parameters for classification of FLLs was evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA is different between in HCC, FNH and CHL. These three lesions can be distinguished using T1 mapping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5630343 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56303432017-10-12 Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma Peng, Zhenpeng Li, Chang Chan, Tao Cai, Huasong Luo, Yanji Dong, Zhi Li, Zi-Ping Feng, Shi-Ting Oncotarget Research Paper OBJECTIVES: To investigate the difference of T1 relaxation time on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and cavernous hemangioma of liver (CHL), and to quantitatively evaluate the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in these three focal liver lesions (FLLs). RESULTS: The T1(P) of CHL was significantly higher than those of HCC and FNH (P < 0.05). Reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary phase could be observed in all three types of lesions. There were significant differences of T1(P), T1(E), T1(D) and T1(D)% between FNH, CHL and HCC (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that T1(D)% was the best indicator for diagnostic differentiation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.702. Discriminant analysis using three variables (T1(P), T1(E), and T1(D)%) showed that the classification accuracy was 88.2%. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 74 patients diagnosed with focal liver lesions underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI including T1 mapping were enrolled, consisting of 51 HCCs, 10 FNHs, and 13 CHLs. T1 relaxation times of these lesions were measured on pre-contrast (T1(P)) and on hepatobiliary phase images at 20 minute after contrast (T1(E)). The reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary (T1(D)) and the percentage reduction (T1(D)%) was calculated. The differences of T1(P), T1(E), T1(D) and T1(D)% in these FLLs were analyzed. The usefulness of these parameters for classification of FLLs was evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA is different between in HCC, FNH and CHL. These three lesions can be distinguished using T1 mapping. Impact Journals LLC 2017-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5630343/ /pubmed/29029443 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18918 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Peng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Peng, Zhenpeng Li, Chang Chan, Tao Cai, Huasong Luo, Yanji Dong, Zhi Li, Zi-Ping Feng, Shi-Ting Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma |
title | Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma |
title_full | Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma |
title_fullStr | Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma |
title_short | Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma |
title_sort | quantitative evaluation of gd-eob-dtpa uptake in focal liver lesions by using t1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630343/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29029443 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18918 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengzhenpeng quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma AT lichang quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma AT chantao quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma AT caihuasong quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma AT luoyanji quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma AT dongzhi quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma AT liziping quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma AT fengshiting quantitativeevaluationofgdeobdtpauptakeinfocalliverlesionsbyusingt1mappingdifferencesbetweenhepatocellularcarcinomahepaticfocalnodularhyperplasiaandcavernoushemangioma |