Cargando…
Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in Wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysis
Wilms’ tumor (WT) is the most frequent malignant renal tumor in children. The survival rate is lower in patients with recurrence, and the factors that influence relapse in WT are not fully understood. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q (LOH 16q) has been reported to be associated with the rela...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29029528 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20191 |
_version_ | 1783269224944238592 |
---|---|
author | Pan, Zhenyu He, Hairong Tang, Lina Bu, Qingting Cheng, Hua Wang, Anmin Lyu, Jun You, Haisheng |
author_facet | Pan, Zhenyu He, Hairong Tang, Lina Bu, Qingting Cheng, Hua Wang, Anmin Lyu, Jun You, Haisheng |
author_sort | Pan, Zhenyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wilms’ tumor (WT) is the most frequent malignant renal tumor in children. The survival rate is lower in patients with recurrence, and the factors that influence relapse in WT are not fully understood. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q (LOH 16q) has been reported to be associated with the relapse in WT, but this remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to clarify this. PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 17, 2017. Ten studies involving 3385 patients were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that LOH 16q was significantly associated with the relapse in WT (relative risk [RR] = 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43–2.13, P < 0.00001; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.38–2.24, P < 0.00001). No significant heterogeneity among studies or publication bias was found. Sensitivity analysis showed omitting one study in each turn could not change the results. Subgroup analysis based on two studies indicated LOH 16q was more effective on elevated replase risk in patients with favorable-histology WT (RR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.68–3.78, P < 0.00001; HR = 2.99, 95% CI = 1.84–4.88, P < 0.0001) but further work are needed to confirm this. These findings confirm that LOH 16q increased the relapse risk in WT, but more studies are required to further assess the association between LOH 16q and WT relapse among different subgroups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5630428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-56304282017-10-12 Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in Wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysis Pan, Zhenyu He, Hairong Tang, Lina Bu, Qingting Cheng, Hua Wang, Anmin Lyu, Jun You, Haisheng Oncotarget Meta-Analysis Wilms’ tumor (WT) is the most frequent malignant renal tumor in children. The survival rate is lower in patients with recurrence, and the factors that influence relapse in WT are not fully understood. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q (LOH 16q) has been reported to be associated with the relapse in WT, but this remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to clarify this. PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 17, 2017. Ten studies involving 3385 patients were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that LOH 16q was significantly associated with the relapse in WT (relative risk [RR] = 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.43–2.13, P < 0.00001; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.38–2.24, P < 0.00001). No significant heterogeneity among studies or publication bias was found. Sensitivity analysis showed omitting one study in each turn could not change the results. Subgroup analysis based on two studies indicated LOH 16q was more effective on elevated replase risk in patients with favorable-histology WT (RR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.68–3.78, P < 0.00001; HR = 2.99, 95% CI = 1.84–4.88, P < 0.0001) but further work are needed to confirm this. These findings confirm that LOH 16q increased the relapse risk in WT, but more studies are required to further assess the association between LOH 16q and WT relapse among different subgroups. Impact Journals LLC 2017-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5630428/ /pubmed/29029528 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20191 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Pan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Pan, Zhenyu He, Hairong Tang, Lina Bu, Qingting Cheng, Hua Wang, Anmin Lyu, Jun You, Haisheng Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in Wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysis |
title | Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in Wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in Wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in Wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in Wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in Wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5630428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29029528 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.20191 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panzhenyu lossofheterozygosityonchromosome16qincreasesrelapseriskinwilmstumorametaanalysis AT hehairong lossofheterozygosityonchromosome16qincreasesrelapseriskinwilmstumorametaanalysis AT tanglina lossofheterozygosityonchromosome16qincreasesrelapseriskinwilmstumorametaanalysis AT buqingting lossofheterozygosityonchromosome16qincreasesrelapseriskinwilmstumorametaanalysis AT chenghua lossofheterozygosityonchromosome16qincreasesrelapseriskinwilmstumorametaanalysis AT wanganmin lossofheterozygosityonchromosome16qincreasesrelapseriskinwilmstumorametaanalysis AT lyujun lossofheterozygosityonchromosome16qincreasesrelapseriskinwilmstumorametaanalysis AT youhaisheng lossofheterozygosityonchromosome16qincreasesrelapseriskinwilmstumorametaanalysis |